tardigrada

joined 2 years ago
 

Archived version

In 2008, a software developer in San Francisco named Curtis Yarvin, writing under a pseudonym, proposed a horrific solution for people he deemed “not productive”: “convert them into biodiesel, which can help power the Muni buses.”

Yarvin, a self-described reactionary and extremist who was 35 years old at the time, clarified that he was “just kidding.” But then he continued, “The trouble with the biodiesel solution is that no one would want to live in a city whose public transportation was fueled, even just partly, by the distilled remains of its late underclass. However, it helps us describe the problem we are trying to solve. Our goal, in short, is a humane alternative to genocide.”

He then concluded that the “best humane alternative to genocide” is to “virtualize” these people: Imprison them in “permanent solitary confinement” where, to avoid making them insane, they would be connected to an “immersive virtual-reality interface” so they could “experience a rich, fulfilling life in a completely imaginary world.”

Yarvin’s disturbing manifestos have earned him influential followers, chief among them: tech billionaire Peter Thiel and his onetime Silicon Valley protégé Senator J.D. Vance, whom the Republican Party just nominated to be Donald Trump’s vice president. If Trump wins the election, there is little doubt that Vance will bring Yarvin’s twisted techno-authoritarianism to the White House, and one can imagine—with horror—what a receptive would-be autocrat like Trump might do with those ideas.

Trump’s first campaign was undoubtedly a watershed moment for authoritarianism in American politics, but some thinkers on the right had been laying the groundwork for years, hoping for someone to mainstream their ideas. Yarvin was one of them.

 

Original link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BIdV-DbZ_8

[Edit typo in the title.]

 

Since the beginning of the generative AI boom, content creators have argued that their work has been scraped into AI models without their consent. But until now, it has been difficult to know whether specific text has actually been used in a training data set.

Now they have a new way to prove it: “copyright traps” developed by a team at Imperial College London, pieces of hidden text that allow writers and publishers to subtly mark their work in order to later detect whether it has been used in AI models or not. The idea is similar to traps that have been used by copyright holders throughout history—strategies like including fake locations on a map or fake words in a dictionary.

These AI copyright traps tap into one of the biggest fights in AI. A number of publishers and writers are in the middle of litigation against tech companies, claiming their intellectual property has been scraped into AI training data sets without their permission. The New York Times’ ongoing case against OpenAI is probably the most high-profile of these.

The code to generate and detect traps is currently available on GitHub, but the team also intends to build a tool that allows people to generate and insert copyright traps themselves.

 

The two sanctioned persons are Yuliya Vladimirovna Pankratova and Denis Olegovich Degtyarenko, both key members of the Russia-aligned hacktivist group Cyber Army of Russia Reborn (CARR), according to a US Treasury press release.

Since 2022, CARR, which also uses the name Cyber Army of Russia, has conducted low-impact, unsophisticated DDoS attacks in Ukraine and against governments and companies located in countries that have supported Ukraine. In late 2023, CARR started to claim attacks on the industrial control systems of multiple U.S. and European critical infrastructure targets. Using various unsophisticated techniques, CARR has been responsible for manipulating industrial control system equipment at water supply, hydroelectric, wastewater, and energy facilities in the U.S. and Europe.

 

Four environmental groups on Monday evening endorsed the presidential run of U.S. vice president and presumptive Democratic nominee Kamala Harris, whom many campaigners view as slightly stronger on climate issues than President Joe Biden.

The League of Conservation Voters Action Fund, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) Action Fund, the Sierra Club, and Clean Energy for America Action issued a statement of support for Harris and pledged to mobilize millions of their supporters behind her.

“Kamala Harris is a courageous advocate for the people and the planet," said Ben Jealous, Sierra Club's executive director.

"She has worked for decades to combat the climate crisis and protect our health and future," he added.

Manish Bapna, president of NRDC Action Fund, agreed that the vice president was well-equipped to step into the top role and deal with the climate crisis.

 

Archived version

A majority of U.S. citizens are now hearing about Project 2025. Among those familiar with the Project 2025, just 11 percent view it favorably, while 43 percent view it unfavorably, a 24 point increase in its unfavorable rating since last month.

It has also become significantly more unfavorable since Trump attempted to distance himself from the plan, a survey conducted by Navigation Research finds.

  • More than seven in ten Democrats are aware of Project 2025 (71 percent) and are overwhelmingly unfavorable toward it (net -57; 7 percent favorable – 64 percent unfavorable, with 62 percent very unfavorable).
  • Independents hold net negative favorability ratings of Project 2025 (net -20; 8 percent favorable – 28 percent unfavorable), but nearly two in three still don’t know enough to have an opinion.

In response to a Trump statement that he knows nothing about Project 2025, the following statements were effective counter arguments:

  • Those who say Project 2025 is Trump’s plan for a second term, since nearly all of the plan’s authors worked for Trump and will likely work for him again if he is re-elected, and it fleshes out the extreme MAGA agenda he’s talked about publicly. (net +10; 55 percent agree with this statement more – 45 percent agree with Trump distancing himself more);
  • Those who say Trump’s Project 2025 would be a dangerous, unprecedented government takeover by Trump and his loyalists that threatens rights, freedoms, and democracy by giving Trump powers like no president before him has ever had… that’s why Trump is unwilling to admit it’s his plan. (net +8; 54 percent agree with this statement more – 46 percent agree with Trump distancing himself more); and,
  • Those who say Trump’s Project 2025 would be a dangerous, unprecedented government takeover by Trump and his loyalists that would hurt the middle class and working families, all to help wealthy billionaire donors… that’s why Trump is unwilling to admit it’s his plan (net +4; 52 percent agree with this statement more – 48 percent agree with Trump distancing himself more).
 

Archived version

"Vice President Kamala Harris opened up a marginal two-percentage-point lead over Republican Donald Trump after President Joe Biden ended his re-election campaign and passed the torch to her," the Reuters/Ipsos poll found. "The poll, conducted on Monday and Tuesday, followed both the Republican National Convention where Trump on Thursday formally accepted his party's nomination and the Biden announcement on Sunday he was leaving the race and endorsing Harris."

Harris led Trump 44 percent to 42 percent in the Reuters national poll. Though the difference was within the margin of error (3 percent), it's an improvement on a Reuters poll taken July 15-16, before Biden quit the race, which tied the Biden/Harris campaign with Trump at 44 percent.

Also positive for Harris: "When voters in the survey were shown a hypothetical ballot that included independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Harris led Trump 42 percent to 38 percent, an advantage outside the margin of error. Kennedy, favored by 8 percent of voters in the poll, has yet to qualify for the ballot in many states ahead of the Nov. 5 election."

It's also an improvement on a Reuters poll taken July 1-2, when Trump led Biden by one percentage point.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Yeah, but it could get better, according to MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell: "Trump is going to have to get used to hearing Harris’ prosecutor record"

Here is a video (17 min): https://invidious.privacyredirect.com/watch?v=5JbXbqe5t_w

 

Archived version

Former President Donald Trump is out of his depth facing the prospect of running against Vice President Kamala Harris instead of President Joe Biden, wrote his niece Mary Trump in her latest email blast — and he's "terrified."

[...] "Donald also hates women (especially strong women) and minorities, so you can see why current Vice President and presidential candidate Kamala Harris terrifies him to the point of incoherence. He says she’s 'crazy,'" Mary Trump says.

She continues: "His childish nickname for her is 'laughing Kamala' because she feels joy, and joy is something he [Donald Trump] has never experienced and doesn’t understand. Faced with the reality that he is now running against a vibrant, intelligent, experienced woman who is fully two decades younger than he is, Donald spent Sunday and Monday flailing, trying to find an angle of attack that would stick."

He's so lost trying to figure out what to do, she added, that he's even continuing to attack Biden, despite knowing Biden has already decided to exit the race.

Combine that with the fact that Democrats have seen a massive surge in donor support and that tech billionaire Elon Musk appears to be backing out of his plan to give a pro-Trump PAC $45 billion a month, Ms. Trump wrote, "Donald and his sycophants, enablers, and backers are scared."

"And they should be," she noted.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Labour rights, privacy rights, antitrust enforcement, cooyrights, DRM, maybe more.

I'd just argue that it's hard to say that this law is more or less important than that law, because it will depend on who you are. If you're a tech worker you'd likely be focused on labour rights, if you're an author it might be copyrights, for example. So we should protect all whose rights are violated.

 

Last week’s Republican National Convention notably downplayed Trump’s persistent lie that the 2020 election, which he lost to Democrat Joe Biden, was stolen from him.

But when Trump returned to the campaign trail Saturday night he did not hold back.

“The Radical Left Democrats rigged the presidential election in 2020 and we’re not going to allow them to rig the presidential election in 2024,” he said, in just one of his references to voter fraud.

[...]

And the crowd cheered as he called on them to “Fight, fight, fight.

[...]

Beautiful’ note from Xi

Trump again touted his relationships with autocrats around the globe, insisting of North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Un that getting along had made the United States safer.

“All he wants to do is buy nuclear weapons and make them,” he said of Kim.

“I said, just relax, chill. You’ve got enough. You got, you got so much nuclear weapons, so much, I said, just relax... let’s go to a baseball game.”

He called Hungarian President Viktor Orban a “very powerful leader” and again insisted that, had he been US leader, President Vladimir Putin of Russia would never have invaded Ukraine in 2022.

And he said he received a “beautiful note” after the assassination attempt from President Xi Jinping of China, calling him a “great guy”.

He said he had told reporters that Xi was “a brilliant man. He controls 1.4 billion people with an iron fist.”

[Edit typo.]

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

The Global Times, a Communist Party-backed media outlet, cited Chinese experts who called Harris’s performance in the White House “mediocre” and claimed she lacked the “experience and achievements to serve as president.”

Another state-run outlet highlighted Donald Trump’s campaign trail claim Harris would be “easier to beat” than the sitting president.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Why can't we have all of it?

 

Cross posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/15146556

Each year, an estimated two million women and girls – equivalent to one in 12 women in England and Wales – are victims of violence perpetrated by a man, according to the first national analysis on the scale of violence against women and girls (VAWG).

Released today by UK's National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) and College of Policing, it has led officials to declare that such 'staggering' numbers constitute a 'national emergency'.

Key data:

  • Violent crime perpetrated by men against women and girls spiked 37% between 2018 and 2023, rising from an estimated 789,703 recorded in 2018-9 to 1,080,157 in 2022-23.
  • One in six homicides, or 100 out of the 590 homicides in the year to March 2023, in England and Wales are linked to domestic violence.
  • Almost a million violent crimes against women and children were recorded between April 2022 and March 2023, averaging 3000 daily offences in England and Wales, or one in five of all police-recorded crimes, excluding fraud.
  • In the year ending March 2023, there were over 2 million cases of sexual harassment, 1.4 million instances of domestic abuse, and 851,000 reports of stalking.
  • Child sexual abuse also increased by more than 400% between 2013 and 2022, with the age of suspects averaging just 15.
  • An estimated one in 20 adults (2.3 million) in England and Wales will be a perpetrator of VAWG every year (2.3 million perpetrators).
 

Each year, an estimated two million women and girls – equivalent to one in 12 women in England and Wales – are victims of violence perpetrated by a man, according to first national analysis on the scale of violence against women and girls (VAWG) in the UK.

Released today by UK's National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) and College of Policing, it has led officials to declare that such 'staggering' numbers constitute a 'national emergency'.

Key data:

  • Violent crime perpetrated by men against women and girls spiked 37% between 2018 and 2023, rising from an estimated 789,703 recorded in 2018-9 to 1,080,157 in 2022-23.
  • One in six homicides, or 100 out of the 590 homicides in the year to March 2023, in England and Wales are linked to domestic violence.
  • Almost a million violent crimes against women and children were recorded between April 2022 and March 2023, averaging 3000 daily offences in England and Wales, or one in five of all police-recorded crimes, excluding fraud.
  • In the year ending March 2023, there were over 2 million cases of sexual harassment, 1.4 million instances of domestic abuse, and 851,000 reports of stalking.
  • Child sexual abuse also increased by more than 400% between 2013 and 2022, with the age of suspects averaging just 15.
  • An estimated one in 20 adults (2.3 million) in England and Wales will be a perpetrator of VAWG every year (2.3 million perpetrators).
 

A landmark bill aimed at standardizing and improving the way police treat victims in the aftermath of a sexual assault has become law in Connecticut.

The new law establishes a council that will create a model policy for police responding to sexual assault, and it received unanimous, bipartisan support. The law also requires that officers refer victims to a victim advocate, distribute information about services available, and help the victim and any children present obtain medical care. Every law enforcement agency in the state will have to meet or exceed the model policy by September 2025, and the council will collect data about police and the overall criminal justice response to sexual assault statewide.

Democratic state Rep. Eleni Kavros DeGraw, a co-sponsor of the bill, cited an investigation by Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting in her testimony about the need for sexual assault victims to be treated better by law enforcement. The investigation, featured in Victim/Suspect, a documentary film by Center for Investigative Reporting Studios, found dozens of cases, including several in Connecticut, in which women reporting sexual assaults were ultimately charged with crimes after law enforcement doubted their stories or zeroed in on behavior common for victims of trauma.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

Kenya spends USD 1 billion in a year to repay Chinese loans, burdening taxpayers


(archived version)

[...] cash sent to Beijing [by Kenya] comprised nearly 100.47 billion KES (703 million USD) in principal sums that fell due, and 52.22 billion KES (365.54 million USD) in interest ]...]

The total amount paid represents a 42.14 per cent jump in the previous year, ending June 2023 [...]

[According to research lab] AidData, "The terms of Beijing's loan deals with developing countries are usually secretive and require borrowing from nations such as Kenya to prioritise repayment of Chinese state-owned banks ahead of other creditors." [...]

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Tankies do like to pretend that they don't support fascism, but they really just ignore it and enjoy their brunches. Forced labour and other human rights violations in autocracies don't effect them personally, therefore it doesn't exist at all.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Sounds like whataboutism tankies do to users here on Lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

A Brief History of Trump and Violence


(archived)

This is the candidate who presided over Nuremberg-styled rallies in 2016, during which he encouraged his supporters to chant that Hillary Clinton should be locked up—and then didn’t push back when some advisers and supporters took the next step and urged that she be executed.

This is a man who said there were “very fine people” among the neo-Nazi marchers in Charlottesville in 2017.

This is the political leader who mused about finding ways to shoot would-be immigrants in the legs, or feed them to alligators, as they tried to cross the southern border into the United States.

This is a person who tweeted, “When the looting starts, the shooting starts,” in response to protests against the killing of George Floyd.

This is a demagogue who, for political advantage, at the height of the pandemic, whipped up angry mobs against public health officers and then refused to condemn those mobs, when they picketed officials’ homes and workplaces, often heavily armed, frequently with exhortations to hang the medics for their advice on social distancing, on closing schools and businesses, or on mask and vaccine mandates [...]

This is a man who refused to call off the dogs when, on January 6, 2021, participants in an insurrectionary riot that he had inspired tried to hunt down the speaker of the House, the vice president of the United States, and miscellaneous other figures.

This is a felonious candidate who, along with his sons, openly mocked the Pelosi family when Nancy Pelosi’s husband, Paul, was seriously injured by a hammer-wielding would-be assassin who tried to beat his brains in, and took to social media to spread baseless rumors that Paul Pelosi had been attacked by his gay lover [...]

This is a candidate who has called for the execution of former chief of staff Mark Milley [...]

Political violence ought to have absolutely no place in how democracies allocate power and influence. That goes not just for the violence unleashed by would-be assassins but also for the more casual, background, daily violence that Trump has, since he first announced his candidacy in 2015, normalized among his supporters.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago

Trump Rally Gunman Was ‘Definitely Conservative,’ classmates recall


(Archived)

Why Thomas Matthew Crooks tried to assassinate Donald Trump is a mystery to investigators and his ex-classmates [...]

[Former classmate] Max R. Smith recalled taking an American history course with Crooks as a sophomore. He did recall Crooks making political statements — but they shed no light on his actions Saturday.

“He definitely was conservative,” he said. “It makes me wonder why he would carry out an assassination attempt on the conservative candidate.”

Smith recalled a mock debate in which their history professor posed government policy questions and asked students to stand on one side of the classroom or the other to signal their support or opposition for a given proposal.

“The majority of the class were on the liberal side, but Tom, no matter what, always stood his ground on the conservative side,” Smith said. “That’s still the picture I have of him. Just standing alone on one side while the rest of the class was on the other.”

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

There is a comprehensive report from 2022 by Safeguard Defenders (mentioned in the article):

Chinese offical corroborates 110 Overseas findings (here is the pdf)

And a folliw-up on Chinese Overseas Police Service Centers in 53 countries around the world (here is the report as pdf)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Just a reminder:

Rights expert finds ‘reasonable grounds’ genocide is being committed in Gaza


(March 2024)

“Specifically, Israel has committed three acts of genocide with the requisite intent: causing seriously serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group, deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part, and imposing measures intended to prevent birth within the group,” she [Francesca Albanese, UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories] said.

Furthermore, “the genocide in Gaza is the most extreme stage of a long-standing settler colonial process of erasure of the native Palestinians,” she continued.

For over 76 years, this process has oppressed the Palestinians as a people in every way imaginable, crushing their inalienable right to self-determination demographically, economically, territorially, culturally and politically.”

[...]

"I implore Member States to abide by their obligations which start with imposing an arms embargo and sanctions on Israel, and so ensure that the future does not continue to repeat itself,” she concluded [...]

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

What's irritating are the reactions by both the company and the authorities. Imagine you're in China and your child or some family member gets hit by car, and then the car company says it was only a 'mild' collision because they had been jaywalking, and the officials add that you should not spread 'rumors'.

They seem to go ahead with more licenses for such cars -if I understand the article correct- as if people's lives don't matter. That represents the worst of neoliberalism within an authoritarian system.

view more: next ›