this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
561 points (95.9% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3856 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

She’s already broken barriers, and now Kamala Harris could shatter several more after President Joe Biden abruptly ended his reelection bid and endorsed her.

Biden announced Sunday that he was stepping aside after a disastrous debate performance catalyzed fears that the 81-year-old was too frail for a second term. 

Harris is the first woman, Black person or person of South Asian descent to serve as vice president. If she becomes the Democratic nominee and defeats Republican candidate Donald Trump in November, she would be the first woman to serve as president. 

Biden said Sunday that choosing Harris as his running mate was “the best decision I’ve made” and endorsed her as his successor.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

That is the real question, is US of A ready for a woman presidency.

It is has been only 100 years women were given rights to vote. And couple of years more than 50 years to universal suffrage.

That's nothing compared to nearly 300 years of its existence.

/s for those who couldn’t get it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

I'm already practicing my "Madame President"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Would she also be the first Asian person to become president?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Right now these firsts are secondary compared to the real states of this election.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why only black? She is half Indian. I don't recall an Indian president?

Oh right nobody cares about other minorities, only kicking out Mexicans and propping up African Americans. Everyone else be damned.

Also why is the presidency limited to natural born citizens? Most of the world except the US, most of South America and a smattering of other countries require this. Shouldn't everyone who has worked to gain citizenship be afforded the right to run for office? Doesn't sound very free to me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I would argue it's a security issue. I think it would be quite feasible for some foreign power to scoop up some 20 year old with nothing to lose and put them to the task of infiltrating America. In fact, stuff like that has already happened: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegals_Program

Nowadays it's much easier to influence the public by just bombarding them with bs social media posts. Watch the documentary "The Great Hack".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So ~85 percent of the world is insecure because a naturalized citizen can run for office?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

All I'm saying is that it's feasible, and very much in the interest of foreign powers to attempt to install people in positions of power. I think that's a very cold take.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Let’s maybe not focus solely on this, instead maybe on policy? Real problems Americans are facing every day is going to win more votes. Making the entire campaign about gender issues isn’t alone going to win shit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Not alone, but it will tick another box in voters' minds

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, she has been shadowing an all-around decent president for the last 3ish years and like Obama, has the legal chops to back it up. Im not a fan of her stances from her DA days, but I dont think there is anyone else more qualified to do the job.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Agreed, I believe she has a lot to offer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm happy for another chance at a Gen X president , not ready for a Millennial VP

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Isn't she technically a very young boomer?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

If elections were based on policy the GOP would have ceased to exist four days into Reagan's presidency.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)

You can bet Republicans are gonna make her race and gender an issue though

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

They already have, filling talks in all spaces with mysogyny and racism as soon as biden bowed out.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

And it's REALLY gonna help the black and woman vote they've been trying so hard to get. Just check out Bowman/Vance these days, dude's holding in his desire to talk about abortion so hard he looks like he could shit himself any moment.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Well that's their loser strategy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Nope, gotta play demographic bingo.

load more comments
view more: next ›