I feel like which network depends on what you're advocating for and to which type of person. For example, Mastadon, Lemmy, and Bluesky are fairly left-leaning, so advocating for a well-known liberal idea there could be "preaching to the choir".
Asklemmy
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
That's a tough question. It's hard to know, because there are so many bot accounts.
The platform providers would like everyone to believe they have 100% solved this, and keep giving them advertising money.
But I feel like the three largest players are also the ones who have done the most to demonstrate general, all around untrustworthiness, recently.
Buying advertising on Facebook seems to be the defacto way to influence masses.
Facebook has incredibly invasive data collection, aggressive algorithms and therefore very fine grained targeting options and it has a bit over 3 billion active monthly users (many of them 100% captive because they wonβt have Internet without Facebook)
Unfortunately you have to have a Facebook account to publish ads on Facebook
And you need to give money to them, yes. But that was not the question.
Fair; idk why I said that lol