this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
423 points (98.6% liked)

politics

24503 readers
3147 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

Breaking news: the girls are fighting again!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 hours ago

Reminding everyone that the bill contains a change to the constitution and the balance of powers between the branches of government.

If this passes the executive branch can no longer be bound by the judicial.

It's a dictatorship the second the house passes this, then the only way Trump will ever leave office is when he dies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

Someone thinks they should have backed the Libertarian Party

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

The new Ross Perot!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 14 hours ago

Do it you coward

[–] [email protected] 0 points 14 hours ago

If Trump deports Musk im getting a MAGA hat lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

Honestly I'm finding their falling outs funnier each time it's happened. What is this, number 3?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

No no, please, do a Nader, be a Bull Moose.

This'll be great!

He'd draw what, a 90/10, 80/20 split of Rep to Dem voters, as well as the truly brain dead of the independents?

Please Musk.

Absolutely do this thing that if it worked would guarantee your failure, and would make it much easier to radicalize the Dem party after their most corporate of corporate donors leave them for you.

Don't back out! This isn't Twitter again, put your back into it!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

I’ll join, I’ll still vote for sane social democratic candidates or the least of all evils, but I’ll join and pretend to prop up the numbers!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago

Hopefully he splits the Republican party and ensures a Democratic majority everywhere.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago

Do it! Do it! Do it!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 19 hours ago

It is too late Elon you enabled and funded this nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How many facist parties US needs?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Smells like the fascists want a new party.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

No no, it's better than that, SOME of the fascists want a new party. I like those odds.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Kayfabe nonsense or a narcissistic delusion, either way it's an absurd fantasy

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

Fuck that guy

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago

We all gave that word a pass when we accepted it as part of the title of that one tv show.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

Shits already broke.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

BREAKING: All articles in [clickbait website] now starts with BREAKING.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

BREAKING: I just took a successful and satisfying shit.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 19 hours ago

BREAKING: I just took a rather unsuccessful half shit that was very unsatisfying and will have to try again later.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Let's be clear about what is upsetting Musk. He is in favour of the tax cuts to the rich. He just thinks that the poor should SUFFER MORE to make the tax cuts happen. He wants to keep all of the stuff that will benefit him, and cut all the stuff that keeps everyday Americans alive. Please don't spin this as some kind of redemption arc for Musk. If anything, he upset that Trump isn't even shittier.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago

I wonder why he's not just joining the Libertarians.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You know, I heard a rumor that AOC should run for president as an independent party, because she'd never make it through the Democratic primaries, but that would be a terrible idea, because it would split the party. Let's say 50% of the country is Democratic and 50% is Republican; if the Democratic vote gets split 25% for the Democrat candidate and 25% for AOC, but the Republican vote stays 50% for their candidate, then the Republicans win in a landslide. I have a feeling that this is why the two-party system is so ingrained into our politics.

But if the Republicans also split their party into MAGA and non-MAGA Republicans at the same time, then that election becomes somewhat balanced again, and probably closer to what the founding fathers actually intended. Granted, Elon isn't calling for a new party for a presidential election, just to stop this bill, but still, it'd be interesting to see an election with four viable candidates rather than two.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

independents are pressure candidates. she likely could run as an independent but it wouldnt actually be to become president. it would be for the Democratic party to buy her concession.

Look at what RFK Jr did. he left the race for a cabinet position and policy agreements.

She could use an independent presidential run to pull the dems back towards the left

[–] [email protected] 91 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Musk could have been a superhero. He could have just made EVs and not done a Nazi salute ... things would probably be fine.

No. He had to tamper in politics and likely give Trump the win. Musk was too dumb to realize he would get thrown to the side the minute he said anything but "yes" to "Great Leader" ... now he is thrown to the side and is too dumb to realize it's over for him. He is hated on all sides.

He can kiss Trumps ass or fade in to obscurity. Those are his options.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

Hell if he wasn’t at a rally for the orange dictator I would say he could make EVs and get away with a salute here and there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

Nazi salute....? You mean not called a man trying to help a bunch of kids trapped in a cave a pedophile, right? Or a thousand other insane things way before a fucking salute, right?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not really. Musk was a snake oil salesman for years. The people who believed in him were foolish to do so, all of that long before his salute and his budget concerns. We should also remember that fascists don't have a long game. They really are as ridiculous as they appear. There was no possibility for Trump or Musk to maintain a positive image, except through brute force threats.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago

While it is true he has been crappy and not really that smart pretty much from the onset, the world would have been happy to continue perpetuating the myth of Musk as the real world Tony Stark.

People wanted that narrative, certain people profited immensely off the myth, and there wasn't much practical downside apart from it being really unjustified for these folks to get so rich, but we accept that downside constantly.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

He still has immense personal wealth, and he can sway politics with these mountains of money . Time will tell.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Am I the only one here who predicts that Elon will jump out of the window soon?

Trump's great friend and inspiration has already sent his oligarchs flying for less.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

It's likely

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I honestly think he's still team Trump and always was, he just dropped the mask and is now trying desperately to put it back on to save his stock.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

None of those people are on anyone else's team. They'll set up alliances where they can mutually profit, but the second any of those profits slip to one side, they're unceremoniously ousted.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

He's always been team Elon, and team Elon also likes to be contrarian and 'edgy', so that aligned with being pro Trump. He also wants to ditch government spending and regulation, which aligns to a claimed GOP principle (though they love spending so it's a lie). So now he's faced with the reality that everyone else already knew, the Republicans spend like crazy, even less responsibly than Democrats.

He basically wants a party to represent the perspective of 'screw poor people' as it's one and only tenant.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Split the Republicans? Yes please

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

He should team up with Andrew Yang. Just a couple of rich boys, fighting against the system. Good times. /s

load more comments
view more: next ›