this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
690 points (92.0% liked)

Greentext

4757 readers
1125 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 53 points 6 months ago (7 children)

See here's the thing, if you believe silly stuff and keep it to yourself, that's fine. People who believe in silly stuff never keep it to themselves though.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

Nah dude flat earthers actually show up to the polls, unlike anon. Gotta start showing up anon!

[–] [email protected] 41 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Flat earthers generally vote for people who are hell-bent on erasing workers' rights. That's why I would be arguing.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Anon has found the way of the masters

[–] [email protected] 89 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The problem is that flat-earthers aren't just that. They usually believe in all kinds of other kooky stuff as well, and some of those beliefs pose an active danger to society.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago (9 children)

Exactly, the same mindset that takes you to “The entire geophysical establishment is wrong/lying about the shape of the Earth, so I’ll listen to this Youtube crank who says it’s a disc instead” will also lead you to things like “The entire medical establishment is wrong/lying about the effectiveness of masks & vaccines, so I’ll listen to this podcast crank hawking horse dewormer instead.”

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

There’s always an implied “them” hiding the conspiracy as well. It’s just a couple of short steps from flat earth to “jews will not replace us”.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago

Normal day at the NASA factory

[–] [email protected] 36 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Anon wouldn't have gotten anywhere with that argument anyways. If your goal is to make them stop believing then you have to ask questions without seeming like you're leading him to a certain conclusion in any way.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Eh nah. Pointless debate and argument is kek

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

At the wage-slave bit, I was hoping that anon would try to raise the coworker's class-consciousness.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

In a sense, they are on the same side.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

It's flat, we all are.

[–] [email protected] 70 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Weird that the OOP thinks it's "intellectual superiority" to simply have your facts straight.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 6 months ago (1 children)

well, it is. I mean, it's a low bar, but comparatively, yeah.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Like saying hygienic superiority is not being covered in feces. It is, but that shouldn't be the contest.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago

I shall remember this comparison and use it at the most inappropriate situation. Thank you.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (4 children)

This is the stupidest shit I’ve ever heard.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

remember that time you called health insurance "gambling", which is why you refuse to get any? (or support universal basic health care)

ah, good times.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I’m flattered that you spend so much time thinking about the things I’ve said.

I’m writing a book of my thoughts, I’ll let you know when I’m done.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

not as stupid as some of your comments elsewhere.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (2 children)

More stupid than oceans on the underside of a ball?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 6 months ago (4 children)

We used to make fun of people like this. Humiliate them. Alas, no more. Everyone's opinion is now valuable.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think that’s what the internet has done for us, it’s removed that sort “social immune system” that prevented crazy ideas from spreading. Before, if somebody had some crazy ideas, the most they could usually do was rant to people on the bus/subway, maybe make some pamphlets, or some other small-scale thing to spread the idea. At best you might find someone on AM radio broadcasting at weird hours. Individuals would get exposed to it, but would likely never pass it on, this contained crazy ideas and they rarely got traction to spread.

Now the internet comes along, and suddenly crazies are getting hooked up with impressionable people easier than ever before. Crazy ideas have an almost endless supply of rubes that will eat them right up. Our social immune system can’t protect society from all the insane things flying around at high speeds all over the place now. It’s intellectual chaos.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I mean the social immune system also prevented ideas like worker solidarity, gender equality, socioeconomic mobility, sexual freedom, etc. from spreading but I get your point. Opening Pandora's box let the crazies out as well as the AOC/Bernie and free Palestine crowds.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

The problem being, at least for the moment, the crazy is winning

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Humiliating people does not help them grow, study suggests

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

No, but it prevents other people from engaging with a topic to begin with

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

it's just as equally effective to break dumb beliefs like this as reasoning is, and both are far more effective than empathy, according to studies.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (12 children)

I'm going to need a source for those claims.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's not that their opinion is now valuable. We just figured out that Bullying doesn't work.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

To supress elements in a herd? Sure it does.

Healthy for the individual? Not so much.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 185 points 6 months ago (4 children)

On the one hand, yeah. Worrying about stuff that you have barely any control over won't get you far. But on the other hand, that guy's vote counts as much as yours. And if he already believes such silly conspiracy theories as the flat earth theory, he will be easily swayed by whoever is the loudest contrarian.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 6 months ago

the challenge isn't to let him enjoy life with his stupid ass conspiracy, it's to get him to realize for himself that he's been duped by both strangers on the internet and Conservative conspiracies. Deradicalizing and then radicalizing is hard as fuck

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›