this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
127 points (99.2% liked)

World News

36776 readers
422 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Remember to turn off your lights when you're not using them to save the environment!

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

Well. Building spaceships is not easy.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Good job SpaceTwitter! This is way more efficient than launching it first!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And probably better for the environment, unless it was full of fuel already

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Sadly, that looked like a pretty big explosion, so assumedly it was at least partially fueled.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

The womp womp icon on my soundbar is task frozen after repeated clicks

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago

SPACE TOURISM

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Physics has had enough of those nazis

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Physics has had enough of those nazis

Or sabotage by a brave anti-fascist SpaceX employee.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Shhh not that loud 🤫

Don't worry, Muskuitos only hear their own voices and smell their own farts.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

but the prototype suffered significant damage.

More like "was blown to pieces and whatever remained burned in fire"

In the long term, SpaceX plans to send 1,000–2,000 ships to Mars every two years

For comparison, ever since Gagarin flight in 1961, there was 398 crewed launches into space.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Right, I make that (using the lowest figure) over 40 launches per month, every month for the 2 years. Anyone who thinks that is plausible is a tad optimistic.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

That is 6.2 per year on average.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Their lies rely on people not realizing they are lies.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Elon's companies are the epitome of the hype-cycle-based stock market manipulation. Take something somewhat useful (EVs, self-driving cars, reusable rockets, ...), spend a bunch of VC cash on building an MVP and advertising, make that advertising overpromise every feature by 300% and just send it. People will buy the stock because of the hype, then buy the product (if applicable) because they own the stock, then be forced to "still like the truck tho"/"COLONIZE MARS" for years, regardless of the actual quality (or lack thereof) of the product, because otherwise their stocks might go down.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Exactly. Hype based capital investment.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

it's predicated on the fact that if people believe it line go up so people believe