this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
947 points (97.7% liked)

Science Memes

10970 readers
2061 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 86 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I know it’s a joke but this is science memes and it plays into a widespread misconception about early humans that we were some kind of blood drenched carnivores. Not true. Humans have always mostly eaten plants supplemented with some meat or other animal foods.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It depends so much on location and period, as an example, the Inuit diet consisted of a lot of meat whole the Kaurna in Australia ate lots of yams.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yeah you’re right, I probably stated it over-broadly. I’m more talking about the typical prehistoric human diet but there were exceptions.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Also it's not like "getting food is easier" is the only hypothesis out there as to why we settled down. Another one, IMO much more in line with human nature, is that we figured out how to ferment beer and for that reason planted buttloads of grain.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Since there’s no written record, it’s hard to know for sure but I believe it was because agricultural communities were able to reproduce much faster and live at much higher densities, so they tended to win conflicts and displace societies based on foraging—even though foragers had better quality of life and didn’t normally experience the food shortages people imagine.

That said, modern foraging societies have largely converted to agriculture after being subjugated and not because they were hungry. So there is some evidence to support this hypothesis.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I don't know how suitable this is, but I instantly thought of it as sort of comparable to bacteria in the wild, compared to the same bacteria moved to a sterile environment and being fed growth medium. The latter can grow to vastly larger quantities in a comparable area, maybe even in a giant vat. But if there's enough of a problem with the single source of growth medium, some kind of contamination or just no more supply, the whole colony dies. It's a more successful colony, but in a potentially far less stable state unless the conditions can continue to be kept that good.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The loss of roaming territory to the sedentary oppressors might also have something to do with the transition.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Right, that’s what I mean. Agricultural societies were likely better organized and more populous and so better able to defend and expel rivals from their lands. Foragers were forced into increasingly marginal lands over time, and all forager societies today exist on land that is essentially unsuited for agriculture, which is the only reason they have survived to this day.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

Also the foraging people might end up living on the periphery of a settlement, foraging and then trading what they foraged with the settlement to make thier lives easier.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Last I heard this was because of overpopulation, making hunting more difficult.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Okay but this is incorrect. Agriculture isn't "eating plants" its cultivating plants.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

yea but on the other hand this is clearly from a comedy skit so not sure this is worth the exercise in pedantry.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Now just hang on a minute, this is the internet after all! How dare you have a sane and rational take on the situation!?

I demand to be called the spurn of a worthless whore ...or something!

[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Cunk on Earth and Cunk in Britain are parody shows. Everything she says in incorrect.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Are you saying that plants can run away?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Yes, and it's very frustrating. People don't realize how difficult the life of a produce farmer is. There's a reason we tie all the produce into the ground. Potatoes used to be a fucking nightmare before we started doing it the new way, burying them in dirt.

Do you have any idea how high a potato jumps if given the chance?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Does she ever admit that? Because that would cause a paradox

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Might need to rewatch her stuff. So funny

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

She is hilarious. Her charachter is amazing in Motherland (Netflix)

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago

The best kind of meme

[–] [email protected] 46 points 4 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 months ago

Gimmie a couple more stomach chambers and I will.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

🌾🍚

🥖🍞

🌽🍿

[–] [email protected] 72 points 4 months ago (2 children)

You ever think about how corn is just really tall grass.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 4 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

No. While corn truly is in the Poaceae, bananas are in the Musaceae. They are not even in the Poales! They are in fact more closely related to ginger and bird of paradise plants (all in the Zingiberales).

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Upvote because the thought of rolling fields of bananas made me happy.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

I don't know if you knew this but the banana tree isn't a tree, but actually some kind of giant grass. So a field of bananas trees is technically a field of grass.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Wheat, rice, barley, rye, corn, millet... Even bamboo is grass!

Well done grass. You really won this round.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

We thought we were the ones domesticating grass when we invented agriculture, but the grass isn't the one that changed how it lives