this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
202 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19062 readers
3910 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Biden was tired from engagements, a sore throat and jet lag. What could go wrong? This was a made-to-order event for trolls.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Regardless, he's toast. This will dog him the entire campaign. The media will harp on every slip, every old age shuffle, every slack jawed stare. He needs to drop out

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You act like the media harping on him for his age is anything new. Russian propagandist really need to stop commenting on our election...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Oh lol. For fucks sake. Someone criticises your fave and they're a "Russian propogandist"? Grow up JFC. Are all the people reporting questioning in the Dems Russian as well? Are the questioning dems all Russian agents? JFC

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oops /s on my last sentence, I understand you are probably not, just that you are not acting in a manner that best fits the scenario where trump loses.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Appreciate the clarification.. Totally missed that it was sarcasm.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

He's definitely not "toast". One stupid debate will not affect anyone's decision to back him. Obama had a bad first debate as well when he ran in his very first electoral race, and he still won. Twice, to be exact. None of these things you mention are going to be a deal breaker for people who know what's at stake, and each day, that number grows. Joe isn't perfect, but he is light years better than another Trump term.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

He is light years better than Trump. A tapeworm is lightyears better than Trump. Question is, what do undecideds think? I only hope Trumps lying and evasion turn off swing voters, but it hasn't so far

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The age thing was already a concern. Now it's a panic. Even top Dems are avoiding question of whether to remove Biden.

The debate was a catastrophe. It really couldn't have gone much worse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And replacing the incumbent last minute would also be catastrophic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Well yeah it's a catastrophe. You can't avoid it. Realistically, Trump was already edging out Biden in the polls, including the 6 swing states.

They need a new candidate immediately.. but nobody else who has the party blessing (newman, kamala, Michelle, etc) polls as good against Trump as Biden.

So what do they do? Damned if you do, damned if you dont. They are probably goinf to lose the election.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

We all do, Joe. That doesn't really change anything.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Setting aside November for a moment, shouldn't we be having a discussion about whether Biden is fit to be president right now? It can't be good for all of the nation's enemies to know the US of A has an addled president, can it?

He should be stepping aside and letting Kamala take over.

Let Democrats see how President Harris fares for a couple months before the Democrat convention has to decide in August whether to run a different candidate or stick with Harris.

That way, if they do decide to run with Harris, she'll be entering the election as an incumbent.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Harris blows

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The incumbent advantage really doesn't apply if it's not who was elected in the first place. The only real advantage would be having a (short) record to run on. Even that assumes that (1) she would have one worth promoting, and (2) that people would care.

The bigger concern is that Harris really, REALLY is not popular. It would take a long time to convince people otherwise, if it could even be done. Hillary spent decades trying to build her image, including a full election cycle in earnest, and failed so miserably that we ended up with Trump.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Not that it helps, but she's currently more popular than Biden.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Clinton was doomed from the start, fox news and their ilk had spent 20 years making her the face of everything they told their viewers to fear.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Yes, and they've also started it with Harris.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

But he is very obviously fit to be president. One single bad debate and suddenly we just throw in the towel? After everything he's already accomplished, and the dangers that Trump represents, the complete unwillingness to rally behind the candidate who already beat Trump once is insane. I don't know what happened in the debate, nobody does really, but his performance afterwards and the day after price pretty clearly that it wasn't senility. He's obviously still perfectly coherent, the debate was just really bad.

Immediately after the debate, when people were dooming out of their fucking minds, there were still undecided voters being interviewed who said Biden won on substance, and that they would vote for him after the debate. Of course maybe fewer than we would like, but people still recognized that Trump was just a bullshit spewing hose of idiotic nonsense and Biden was bringing some receipts.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago

I upvoted you because you got downvoted for some reason even though you are spitting facts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Us dweebs who follow politics don't know how undecided voters think

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Turn back before its too late. Biden deserves to be trounced after that performance. Next gaff could be worse. Too late to give him more chances, pivot or lose. We cannot afford to Weekend at Bernies a presidential candidate. Yes. Throw in the towel, that is the only way to face reality.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Biden got confused about the receipts he brought. Trump brought the alley

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

What Trump brought was an overblown ego and a fountain of lies and vitriol that his idiot followers eat up like candy.

load more comments
view more: next ›