this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
346 points (97.5% liked)

Science Memes

10842 readers
2289 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
346
We need a larger one. Yes, for the last time. Pleeeeeeeeeease! (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
76 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Honest question: why is a larger collider even needed? Just make the particles run more loops around your track.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

I like how it went from second to third picture. Borders? Who needs borders?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

Larger Hadron Collider

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

Just one more collider bro I swear just this one and we'll fix the standard model bro just one more I swear

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Just wait until the day somebody makes one that's a full 1 AU in radius.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It'll still be called the Future Circular Collider when it's shut down after forty years of service. You gotta commit to a scale in the proposal, like the Overwhelmingly Large Telescope.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Chucky McParticleface

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Lead engineer, Dr. Slab Bulkhead.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is we even sure Geneva hasn’t already been overrun by the Combine?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

No, that would be Bulgaria

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Of course they need a bigger one. They haven’t spontaneously created a world-ending black hole yet.

(Actually? They should build one looping around the meridians. Maybe build a turret at each pole. You know. In case aliens show up. )

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

My understanding based on watching too many science communicators videos on YouTube is that such tiny black holes would evaporate quickly before causing harm that humans could appreciate. However, this would provide experimental evidence of Hawkings theory.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Unironically, getting to watch short-lived black holes explode could be really, really useful.

But no, the larger one on the picture isn't anything near big enough for that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Didn’t stop some fearmongering from the last one that went operational.

“The new supercollider could cause BlAcK hOLeS; ExPeRtS SaY!!!1!1!1!1!2!?3!!4!!!”

Honestly, I would love a slow-mo guys style video of a bunch of ~~nerds~~very professional researchers smashing microsingularities into random ~~fruit~~ targets.

I assume it would be fairly boring without some massive magnification… but ya know….

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

What's the new one for?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

AI particles & AI physics 🤡

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

More particles. MOOOOOREEEE!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

For smashing things

load more comments
view more: next ›