this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

547 readers
67 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Imagine facepalming because someone said that genocidal mass-murderers should be stopped. The adults are in the room.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

if he said “drumpf is orange and fat” instead this would have been posted to r/MadeMeSmile

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

How much you wanna bet that the Trump regime uses this to be even more Islamophobic and hawkish on Iran?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Our noble regime change

Their assassination of a government official

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

We should start calling executive orders fatwa

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

they used to resemble fatwa but the supreme court is intent on making them royal decrees so not really fitting anymore

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think mobilizing racism in that way will help in the long run.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Hmm, you are probably corrext

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Not a bad idea.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (4 children)

More scary Islamophobia by choosing to use the spooky Arabic word. A "fatwa" is just a legal ruling interpreted by religious leaders. You may as well call it a verdict. You can have a fatwa towards one couple's divorce. You can issue fatwas on car traffic. On food. Elections. Fire departments. It's just scholars sitting down and saying "How should we interpret our religion regarding this issue?"

But that's not why the media uses the term. They're doing it to deliberately obfuscate what's being said and trying to make westerners associate "fatwa" with murder and assassinations. That way, when their audience encounters the term from other sources (like if they saw a post on the official Iranian Twitter account), they immediately think those dastardly brown people are plotting to kill people.

What's even more bullshit is Persians aren't Arabs. They speak Farsi, not Arabic. That doesn't stop the media from latching scary words their story to reinforce orientalism.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

do they use a different word in farsi? i've never seen someone transliterate it differently, but i don't speak it

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A close translation could be a decree or edict? Or does decree sound more arbitrary?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

It's more like a verdict or ruling. For example, Muslims can only declare war if Muslims have been killed or if Muslim property has been destroyed. They also aren't supposed to declare war against other Muslims.

So when the Israelis fired missiles on Iran with American weapons, it becomes a question of how involved is the US? Isreal has met the criteria according to the teachings of Muhammad and the Koran. The fatwa is issued here where scholars consult the Koran and each other over whether or not declaring war on the US would violate the law. The Iranians have concluded the US does meet the criteria because the US is acting through Isreal as its proxy.

This is what's been said by their officials and why the announcement. It's similar to the US Supreme Court ruling whether or not drone strikes are constitutional and within the president's power, then making an announcement for or against.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

He's just doing what Trump and Bibi have been doing for years. They openly comment about killing him, now he's openly saying they can be killed back

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Good, let cracKKKers be scared

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

More scary Islamophobia by choosing to use the spooky Arabic word.

Nooo you don't understand brown people are scary...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Remember a year ago when a kid shot at Trump and like 60% of the country said "well he's got a point tho"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Yeah, kinda weird reddit takes exception to this given how much of a lib place it is. Like even as a lib who believes in "decorum", shouldn't you be understanding of the fact that someone who just got their country attacked by a US proxy wouldn't take too kindly to the heads of states complicit in the assault?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How is this a bad thing?

Unless they're trying to say that this justifies Trump's actions

Which is dumb because Trump is just going to do what he's planning anyway

You don't have to be nice to people who are trying to kill you and keep threatening to kill you

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

who are trying to kill you

They're acting like Trump and Netanyahu wouldn't have every member of Iran's government assassinated if they could. Typical NATO brains, thinking they can kill other country's military officers and politicians without retaliation.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

they think anything muslim leaders do is facepalm and cringe. the top comment was something about “put all three of them in a room and let them fight it out”. i would bet money that person has no idea who this even is and couldn’t tell you anything about him, his views, or iran

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

they probably think anything a religious leader does is facepalm and cringe, a pretty safe bet. they should be treating this fatwa like the times the western media glazed frankie for dragging the church into the 18th century.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

i feel like if the pope so much as toothlessly criticized trump then liberals would get down on their knees and start licking the feet of the church but the grand ayatollah says some real ass shit and people wanna act like its bad

they would also rather he call upon muslims to vote against him trump (even tho he cant run again anyway)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

should've called him "literally hitler" like they did during the campaign

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Even as the most liberal liberal, you gotta agree with him.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yeah if god exists they are truly the enemy of god. they’re destroying all of god’s creation for the one thing the bible says you can’t worship instead of god; money

ive been an ‘atheist’ my whole life but if god is real these people are going to hell

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, God gave us ten rules and Trump has broken all of them

He's going to SuperHell

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

They're gonna have to figure this shit out in the afterlife I don't think djinns would want anything to do with cracKKKers