this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
547 points (95.2% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4400 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Former President Donald Trump ramped up his threats to prosecute President Joe Biden if he wins another term in the White House.An appeals court rejected Trump's claims of immunity in the federal election subversion case in the District of Columbia, although he intends to press the same argument in ...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

I love his "I'm bored" stupid faces hes forced to make when in court 😭🤣 not even in his wildest dreams he imagined himself in that position and the DC jan 6 criminal onel seems to be primed for this summer 🤩🍿

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago

Blackmail doesn't work if everyone knows you're being blackmailed!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Are there any kind of standards on sources here? Raw Story is garbage, and this article basically boils down to a clickbait headline about a Truth Social post.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

He's been floating this shit for months and just yesterday his lap dogs in the house tried to impeach Mayorkas cause they had nothing on Biden, he's said "I'm your retribution". This whole "presidents need immunity cause they would be subject to harassment when leaving office" is thinly veiled code for I'm gonna do it. The crucial part is that if you're not a declared criminal that gets difficult to accomplish when indictments are handed down by a jury

[–] [email protected] 39 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Difference between most Democrats and Republicans is that if a Democrat committed a crime another Democrat would want them prosecuted, same if a Republican committed a crime. Whereas if a Republican committed a crime other Republicans want the charges dropped and if a Democrat committed a crime they’d be calling for the death penalty.

Crimes are bad, mmm-kay. Doesn’t matter what side you’re on, mmm-kay. So, let’s not be bad, mmm-kay.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

People give my "deep blue" state crap for corruption because so many of our politicians have been sent to prison for it.

... Ignoring that they're in prison because we actually investigate and charge our politicians for corruption, unlike their corrupt as hell states where those people are protected.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

he won't blackmail, he will have-murdered Biden, in 2025.

Anyone who can't see that coming is wearing rose glasses.

_ /\ _

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

On fifth ave ? With a gun ?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Does he not realize that if he gets his wish, there would be nothing stopping Biden from having him assassinated as he walks out of the courthouse?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Out of the courtroom? Joe Biden could Terminator march into the courtroom and cap everyone! Who could stop him? Any judge ruling Trump's way would simply put a hand over the gushing wound in their heart and say "God bless America" as everyone is summarily executed by order of the President. I can only assume it would be illegal to stop him at that point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I think the first step should be to just be to strip him off his secret service bodyguards...

[–] [email protected] 35 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Not a lawyer and not sure if this applies here, but the threat of blackmail itself seems like it should constitute a crime:

18 U.S.C. § 873 (2021)
§873. Blackmail

Whoever, under a threat of informing, or as a consideration for not informing, against any violation of any law of the United States, demands or receives any money or other valuable thing, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

the threat of blackmail itself seems like it should constitute a crime

My guy has been indicted 91 times and counting. What's one more?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Those are rookie numbers. Not even triple digits.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah that was what I was thinking : in America, land of the lawyers, can't you sue someone who make such important threats ?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago

You would think so, but apparently Trump had it right when he said he could shoot somebody on 5th Avenue and not get in trouble. The laws never seem to get applied to him as they would anyone else in the country.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Your boss, Sleepy Joe, is a man with considerable means and connections, and if he's what you say he is, a communist with the power to imprison you, your plan is to blackmail this person?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

I understood this reference.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago

The dichotomy of the GOP and specifically trump: they're both strong and weak at the same time.

Actually, that's a play right out of the fascism handbook.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

Schrodinger's president

[–] [email protected] 32 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

He's asking Biden to pardon him... "or else..."

[–] [email protected] 28 points 9 months ago (2 children)

That sounds like an admission of guilt to me.

Pardons by law are an admission of guilt since like 1925.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

GETTING a Pardon is an admission of guilt, but not only would said pardon absolve the guilty of any punishment for the crime, asking for a pardon is not an admission of guilt.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I don't see how asking for permission to admit guilt is not in itself an admition of guilt, unless it were stated as a hypothetical "if I were offered a pardon, then I might accept it"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Small clarification.

Accepting the pardon is accepting the guilt for the crime for which you were pardoned.

You could always choose not to accept the pardon and fight the charges in court.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

Like it would matter to him and his base.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

This ought to be #92 but probably won't be.

load more comments
view more: next ›