this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
159 points (88.0% liked)

Asklemmy

44332 readers
1228 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm not saying the worst, otherwise I would need to include the star wars sequels or transformers movies... Just some really dumb movie that somehow got praised.

For me has to be Ready Player One. That movie message is so "uhuh" obvious that is stupid, the whole nerd that saves the world in a thing that otherwise would be useless to know in real life... The so over the top evil gaming corporation. The whole 80s and 90s movies and games references get old after half an hour... And it's so pandering towards the geeks and nerds, they really want the viewer feeling really cool for knowing that is the Shining hallway, or that is a Monty python reference... Or look a GUNDAM! YOU'RE SO COOL FOR COLLECTING THOSE GUN PLA! Look we have also overwatch and halo in the background! You're so cool modern gamer!

Also the obviously attractive "nerd" hacker girl that thinks she's ugly and deformed for having a small hard to see red tint in one side of her pretty face... Cmon man. In no universe anyone would think that actress is ugly.

And the message at the end is so hilarious: Look man, you're cool for getting these references and being a real gamer is cool, but go outside more!

Is like the creators have no self awareness.

(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 29 points 7 months ago (1 children)

James Cameron's Titanic. It's marketed as a romantic film, but the moment you start looking at other aspects of the movie, it just seems stupid. The antagonist is so cartoonishly evil, it's a wonder they didn't give him a mustache to twirl.

And then there's the ending. Oh dear lord, the ending. Spoiler warning and all that: at the end of the movie, The Titanic s(t)inks and the passengers try to get to safety. Rose finds a floating door or something to stay afloat and finds Jack swimming in the freezing ocean. Then Jack makes the most non-sensical decision in the entire movie: he sacrifices his own life for no good reason. The plot frames it as a necessary sacrifice, but it totally IS unnecessary, because there was enough room on the stupid door for two people. And then we flash forward to the present, where Rose is old, but still has that gem she wore throughout the movie... and then she tosses it into the ocean. WHY.

Basically the plot boils down to: two young people have a fling on a boat and then the boat sinks. It absolutely did NOT deserve all those academy awards it got that year.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 7 months ago (5 children)

People are STILL bringing up the "there's enough room" arguments?

The movie LITERALLY shows you why it doesn't work. At first they both try to climb on it, but they're too heavy and the stupid thing capsizes. Only then is Jack like "You go take it, Imma good"

Also, Mythbusters tried it and got the same results. 2 people to heavy, 1 ok.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's been a while since I've seen the movie (and have no desire to see it again) and I don't remember the scene as clearly, so that's on me. Throwing away the gem was still colossaly stupid, though.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Dark Knight trilogy. I firmly think between Nolan and Bale, Batman is forever scared. Every version I've seen of Batman sense has been this dark brooding boring character. Oh and that ridiculous voice. "The Batman", kept dark and brooding but at least he was a detective again. But that trilogy was terrible beginning to end. The slight glimmer of hope is Heath Ledger's performance which was great but still not enough to carry a trilogy.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Batman has been dark and broody decades before the Nolan trilogy.

There have been lighter versions but dark and broody are basically core qualities of the character

[–] [email protected] -5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah no. I think you're confused because Batman Begins came out in 2005 which was decades ago.

If you forgot he's actually also known as Bruce Wayne and he knows how to smile and have a good time. Any actually cared about the various villains that he fought against. He used to be a clever detective.

Post Nolan he is has lost a lot of complexity. That complexity of the character offset his serious side when the cowl came on.

Look me dead in the eye and tell me Nolan's Batman is better than BTAS. Or is even in the same ballpark.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Yeah no. I think you're confused because Batman Begins came out in 2005 which was decades ago.

I'm talking about Batman the character, you know? The one first published in 1939. There have been multiple versions but "dark and broody" has been a pretty common trait

If you forgot he's actually also known as Bruce Wayne and he knows how to smile and have a good time

No, it's been well established he cannot get past the trauma of having his parents murdered in front of him. Actually, it has been well established he is now Batman and Bruce is the disguise... So no, he doesn't really know how to have a good time

Post Nolan he is has lost a lot of complexity. That complexity of the character offset his serious side when the cowl came on.

Not really Nolan's fault and not what you claimed first either. Batfleck for example was not dark and broody, he was just a fumbling idiot who claimed his superpower was money

Look me dead in the eye and tell me Nolan's Batman is better than BTAS. Or is even in the same ballpark

Again moving the goal post ... What does BTAS have to do with your comment that Nolan made Batman dark and broody??

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

What’s it’s like to be so fucking wrong?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 7 months ago

Sorry you like garbage

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Man you're on fire haha

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Dark Knight. Heath Ledger's Career defining performance can't save this tortuously paced, boring, dreary, washed out slog of a war on terror metaphor. I hate Christopher Nolan, all of his movies are like this.

The star wars prequels get a lot of hate, but honestly, all of the cracks were beginning to show in Return of the Jedi. 4 and 5 are indisputably good movies, and part of the cinematic canon. Jedi has a lot of small things wrong with it... and also Leah is Luke's sister randomly. This is a Lucasism, and as the people who were capable of standing up to Lucas fell away, and were replaced by people who grew up in star wars. Everything that makes the OT good is present in the prequels, and everything that makes the Prequels... contentious is present in Jedi. For the record, I like the prequels but I think they are flawed in really interesting ways.

Jedi is even in quality with all the prequels and sequels that came after, but has a better rep than it deserves because it stands next to the first (best) two.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Never been a fan of the Dark Knight. So damn boring and ridiculously overrated.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί