this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
632 points (99.2% liked)

News

23301 readers
3329 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Conservative-dominated court restores books denounced by officials as ‘pornographic filth’ to school libraries

An appellate court has ruled that Texas cannot ban books from libraries simply because they mention “butt and fart” and other content which some state officials may dislike.

The fifth US circuit court of appeals issued its decision on Thursday in a 76-page majority opinion, which was written by Judge Jacques Wiener Jr and opened with a quote from American poet Walt Whitman: “The dirtiest book in all the world is the expurgated book.”

In its decision, the appellate court declared that “government actors may not remove books from a public library with the intent to deprive patrons of access to ideas with which they disagree”.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

So kids, as we know now, our ancestors, the hominids that came before us, they all had big butts apparently. Ha! I said butts! Now they can't ban my book on evolution!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Sometimes I wonder why America is a called "the land of the free".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

I have one question why

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

Not even close to the most ridiculous things in books Texas had tried to ban.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

Reminds me of Stephen Colbert and Hugh Laurie pointing out the sheer ridiculousness of censoring words:
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x12t3st

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

I swear Captain Underpants already negated this like a decade ago lol

[–] [email protected] 26 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Good. Fuck Butt Fart Texas. Books should not be censored for words. I remember a teacher in maybe 7th grade reading a book outloud with the word fuck in it, and he just said it and kept reading, he.knew the book well. I gained a lot of respect for that teacher and listened to him because I felt like he wasn't going to censor what he taught us.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

Good teacher. Authors choose their words intentionally. I'm guessing "fudging", "friggen", and "ducking" (thanks iPhone) are not great replacements for the subject matter.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

what, trying to equate "butt" and "fart" with porn didn't work?

-moron GOP who think everyone is as dumb as they are

[–] [email protected] 45 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Imagine being all worked up about books mentioning raging obscenities like 'butt' and 'fart', only to get slapped in the face by Judge 'Wiener'. 😂

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Imagine having that much of an issue with barely offensive words that their kids will never read because most don't use the school library anyway.

And imagine letting your kids come home and access whatever media they want including actual pornography on the internet. Most of these parents have zero clue how to block internet sites on their home computers and laptops let alone the phones that their kids all have.

But of course, that's another problem some parents are asking the government to solve by forcing porn sites to require visitors to affirmatively identify themselves and their age. Of course, that only applies to the major porn sites that play by the arbitrary rules anyway. All so stupid.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

Theyre trying to ban him next

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

Didn't Trump fart all the time while in court? I'd expect them to love farts and huff them all the time. Their lord and savior deemed it good enough for his behind, so it shall be good enough for their noses. It was his political statement, banning farts from books is political motivated terrorism or something like that, I don't know. I'm not insane enough to understand their intentions.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Imagine being that offended by Captain Underpants

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

These are the same people who tried to get Mr Rogers taken off the air and tried to shut down PBS entirely.

I think the average city-American doesn't fully appreciate how backwards most of our country really is. As someone who grew up in the rural outskirts I can tell stories of the people and communities and attitudes that would probably be shocking to many people, but there are so many people like this that they have significant power over our land. We have to be a lot better about enforcing education in our country, we need to bring the morons back up out of the dark-ages, because there are a fucking LOT of dark-age imbeciles across the US shaping policy for all of us and most of the time they run unchallenged because everyone just fixates on presidential elections every four years and nothing else.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Sadly they slowly dismantle public education at every turn. I'd be curious to see the uptick in the past 40 years of homeschooling, particularly those doing so for religious reasons.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's not the last 40 years, it's been since Civil Rights legislation and the Brown vs Board decision.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Curious to see the numbers for any time range, just suspected a growth in past few decades.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The desenting opinion called the court the "library police" for refusing to let the state police the library.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

All they know is projection

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, we know how this is going to go: "If you won't let us ban books from the library, we'll just ban the library."

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Already happening in some places. Local governments are cutting library funding because they don't like the some of the content that their libraries are stocking, but the courts won't let them ban it all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Time to open private non-profit libraries, offer classes on social tolerance and apply for public grants?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Which was probably the intent from the start.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Btw, I absolutely ADORE that the acronym for the system used by libraries to weed out old books is MUSTIE 😆❤️

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

What does MUSTIE stand for? You can't just leave us hanging! 🤓

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Llano County applies the “MUSTIE” factors in weeding books, as recommended by experts in the field, under which a book is evaluated for whether it is (1) “Misleading and/or factually inaccurate,” (2) “Ugly (worn out beyond mending or rebinding),” (3) “Superseded by a new edition or a better source,” (4) “Trivial (of no discernable literary or scientific merit),” (5) “Irrelevant to the needs and interests of the community,” or (6) “Elsewhere (the material may be easily borrowed from another source).”

[–] [email protected] 48 points 5 months ago (1 children)

From the "fuck your feelings" crowd lol

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No, no, no! You got it all wrong. It’s the kiiiiiiiids.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Kids fucking live for fart and butt jokes. I've never seen a group of children giggle harder than when I watched a teacher read "I Need a New Butt."

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

My older kids went through a phase where they were just randomly saying “butt” for like a year. By the end of it I couldn’t stand my own ass.

“Hey dad, dad, DAD!”

“What is it kiddo?”

“Butts! Ahahahahaha. Just picture it, crack down the middle, poopin’, just hanging out being a butt.”

When I realized I hadn’t heard the word “butt” for a few months, my sigh of relief could have changed the orbit of the planet.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago

Republicans are NOT Snowflakes!

[–] [email protected] 66 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think it says something that one of the books they were trying to ban was Called Themselves the K.K.K: The Birth of an American Terrorist Group by Susan Campbell Bartoletti.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 5 months ago

If you look at the books that were banned and take out all the humorous ones about butts and farts, you're left almost exclusively with books about past conservative atrocities and books about current targets of conservative bigotry.

The people who want to ban these books were too bigoted for the 5th Circuit. They'll probably try to close the whole library next.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago (3 children)

And in 5 years they’ll all be wearing “Make Butt Fart Again” hats.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

I want that hat. It should be brown.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Now I want nothing more than to parade around in front of a bunch of conservatives in a "Make Butt Fart Again" hat

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I haven't farted in like twenty years. You have no idea how much you start to miss it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Jesus, I am propelled everywhere I go by farts. Makes the kids laugh so I guess I’ll be alright.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Scrottie McBugger-Balls (the book they wrote in South Park)

load more comments
view more: next ›