this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023

1 points (100.0% liked)

Games

31805 readers

1447 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

Submissions have to be related to games
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
No excessive self-promotion
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Epic Games Admits In Court That Its PC Store Still Isn't Profitable (kotaku.com)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

18 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 18 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I was up for a Steam competitor. I signed up for the Epic store a few years back. Tried to get the first free game. It wasn't available in my region despite being plastered all over the store in my region. The exact same thing happened the next month. Both of those games were available on Steam in my region at some pretty low prices by then.

Then, Epic started paying for exclusivity, making games not available in my region at all. I had at least deleted their stupid app by then anyway. Fuck Epic entirely.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Used to have similar problem with Steam back in the day.

Edit: I like how some people disagree that i experienced something by downvote. It's not like i can change it or something 😅 👌

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

My launcher shows that I have 379 games from Epic. Not DLC, not demos. Full games.

I have never given Epic a single cent and I never will. (That is to say, until they offer me something that makes me want to use their platform). They have no killer features - AT ALL.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago

I spent about $600 with epic. All of that was on fortnite skins. None of it on games.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The "killer feature" is that they pay more to the developers, so if you are getting the exact same game on (e.g.) Steam versus Epic Games, then whomever actually made the game gets more money from the Epic sale. Isn't that a good thing?

(Note that I may be conflating the publisher with the developer, but either way, it's still the case that less money is taken by intermediaries, which is a good thing.)

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Note that I may be conflating the publisher with the developer

You think?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes, I do, or else I wouldn't have mentioned it. I'd prefer the publisher gets money over a middleman store. Isn't that preferable?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Its a phrase that signals something else, and not a literal content reply.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How about you write what you mean and have quality conversation in the future?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago

How about you write what you mean

I did. Its a standard phrase used by people in conversation. See defintion #2 below.

Below definition is from here ...

you think

A question one uses at the end of a sentence to express uncertainty. We're not going to get into trouble—you think?

A sarcastic rhetorical question used as a retort when someone states the obvious. A: "Wow, I bet that fire is really hot." B: "You think?"

and have quality conversation in the future?

Quality is in the eye of the beholder, apparently. /shrug

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Using dishonest tactics to claw away market share won't work with gamers. Steam got to where it is by good will, good prices and good features.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Steam got to where it is by good will, good prices and good features.

Well, eventually.

When Steam was first released, the running joke was "steaming pile of shit". It was slow, unreliable and only a couple of shades of green away from the worst color in the world. People complained about the birth of "always online" games and about paying full price but not even getting a box with it.

It's not exactly unassailable now either. It's my platform of choice as a user but for indie developers, the 30% cut is brutal and last I used it, the Steamworks SDK was pretty rough. The app itself also has a lot of legacy bloat like a built in MP3 player.

It's ahead of the rest but I think "good will, good prices and good features" might be an overly romantic take on "it's where all my games already are".

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago

Well, eventually.

When Steam was first released, the running joke was

Has anything ever worked perfectly when first released?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

the 30% cut is brutal

Reportedly Epic's 12% barely covers costs and would not if they included transaction fees. 20% seems to be the bare minimum if you want a store to actually have good service, and then I'm giving Valve additional credit for sinking boatloads of money into general infrastructure, in the long term Proton alone is worth those 10%. Much unlike the rest of the stores (exception GOG) which take the same 30% and are run by humongous multinationals.

...and then there's itch.io. If you're a small and scrappy indie very much an option: They're also small and scrappy. And they'll probably shout at you if you try to upload a 20G game I very much doubt their servers would survive an AAA launch. OTOH, reportedly their average revenue split is 8% (customers can choose).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The difference is that Steam sells a ton of copies every single day. The vast majority of Valve's fortune has come from that fee. People jump to defend Steam but it’s already been established by lawsuits against other major corporations that a 30% cut is mostly driven by greed.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The 30% cut was industry standard for digital distribution for years. Google, Apple, and numerous other players all took 30% as standard.

That being said, Steam hasn't taken a flat 30% for years now - their standard agreement starts at 30%, decreases to 25% after the first $10m in sales, then decreases further to 20% after $50m.

Furthermore, Valve has done more in terms of providing services, APIs/libraries, and end-user features (all with no additional fee to the developers or consumers) than any other game storefront has. I'd say they more than justify their cut.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago

Industry standard by massive corporations synonymous with corporate greed. Boy am I glad the fee decreases after $10m in sales. That will go a long way with helping out indie devs.

It’s okay to like Steam because they’ve provided us with a good way of purchasing and playing games. I like Steam but we don’t have defend things that are obviously greedy.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago

Maybe just uh..

Put your games on steam?