this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
869 points (99.2% liked)

News

30555 readers
2900 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The home, which was run by an order of Catholic nuns and closed in 1961, was one of many such institutions that housed tens of thousands of orphans and unmarried pregnant women who were forced to give up their children throughout much of the 20th century.

In 2014, historian Catherine Corless tracked down death certificates for nearly 800 children who died at the home in Tuam between the 1920s and 1961 — but could only find a burial record for one child.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I love how the headline says as if this happened recently. Clowns.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

The article is a pile of crap. However another excavation has started this week, which is what probably what triggered the publish of this crap.

If you are interested here are better sources:

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (9 children)

DNA analysis found that the ages of the dead ranged from 35 weeks gestation to 3 years.

Ok, atrocities aside, how the hell can you tell age from DNA? DNA doesn't change as you age.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It actually does, telomeres shorten, this is one of the most important reasons why we, you know, age.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You don’t, the „journalist“ just made that up instead of searching for a minute finding details that would have enabled them to write a proper article.

There’s even an extensive Wikipedia article outlining known facts and atrocities - dumping the bodies is probably the least atrocious thing they’ve done.

There is even a Tuam Home Survivors website listing the names of the deceased and how they were uncovered by the historian.

Apparently this week they started a new dig to uncover the bodies as they found some but not nearly all of them.

It took me just a couple of minutes to uncover the info and write a tiny bit of that down. This is how journalism dies.

EDIT: This ARTE.tv Documentary outlines that DNA is used as you would expect: to identify the remains of lost relatives.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thank you. I asked myself same. Telomeres I guess you would need to know the length after birth. But we only have one sample (moment of death). Plus the victims bodies are probably not very good preserved. My best guess is, the text is just not accurate and they might used DNA testing for different things (sex, etc).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Telomere length is the only thing I can think of, but that's totally a guess and I don't know much about it. Telomeres, as I understand it, are padding at the end of DNA and shorten as you age.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I'd guess they look at the telomeres but I don't how accurate it can be.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This isn't the only place this has happened. More info here.

https://youtu.be/Bwabh4zbmZ4

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thats awful, but you know who wont drown babies and hide their bodies in a septic tank?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I swear to God if the answer is a shark....

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Don’t get off topic. Also, that’s speciesist, and just kind of rude.

The answer is the sponsors of this podcast!

Edit: Also, sharks would never do that, though. None of you have any reason to fear u-them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Scopes reports that the babies were buried in an adjacent structure and that the number is undetermined. An amateur published that number without evidence.

Until additional information is uncovered, it is not possible if the grave was a result of legitimate or initiate reasons.

https://www.snopes.com/news/2025/06/18/796-children-septic-tank-ireland/

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Honestly, I'm disgusted how you misquote Snopes in an attempt to smear the historian and to gloss over the atrocities committed at Tuam and similar facilities.

The Snopes article pretty much contradicts your comment entirely.

Other Sources:

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Wow, what an awful but fascinating read. Really changes the perspective on this.

It wasnt a place that harmed or neglected children, but rather a place that housed the most vulnerable at a difficult time and endured immense hardship.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Actually it was a place that harmed, neglected and even tortured children.

"There can be no Justice without redress for survivors and that redress must be paid for by Religious Orders who have harvested enormous wealth by inflicting misery and death on the most vulnerable in our society.

There can be no Justice without an Inquest into the dead of Tuam. They died horribly and unnecessarily. They had no life as children. The State owes them the dignity of an Inquest and a Death Certificate that truly shows why they died.

There can be no more betrayals of our dead children."

Source: Tuam Home Survivors

Also check out the Wikipedia article. The investigations and excavations are ongoing, so there will be proof of even more atrocities uncovered.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You say the number is inaccurate, which begs the question: what exactly is an acceptable number of infant remains to find in an orphanage septic tank?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There’s an extensive Wikipedia article outlining known facts and atrocities - dumping the bodies is probably the least atrocious thing they’ve done.

EDIT: I believe OP is trying to distract from the atrocities by focussing on a minor one and misquoting Snopes.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Raises. It raises the question.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you read the scopes article, the number is zero and zero is a great number. "The human remains found by the Commission are not in a sewage tank but in a second structure with 20 chambers..." How did these children die? Were they murdered? Was there a pandemic? Neglect? Famine? Over what time range was this collective grave used?

After the story in Canada that sparked the burning of multiple churches was found out to be entirely false, I'm going to wait for actual facts here.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›