Well I hope their urban training is still that bad if we ever have to fight them. And the robot dogs seem like a good idea until one of them gets introduced to OPFORs size 12 boot.
this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
135 points (95.9% liked)
Technology
59378 readers
2612 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Horizon is a WARNING, not a SUGGESTION!
China seems to disagree.
Pre-emptive Zero Dawn, do it now!
it does not look like a derivative at all
How dare you! China doesn't copy, it just takes others' ideas and improve them! sometimes.
Both strongly resemble Boston Dynamics's "Spot" robo-canine.
I'm betting that's exactly what they are, with some glued-on plastic detailing.
The wet dream of the 1% is coming true; Their own personal army with no moral compass.
On the bright side, it's Chinese hard/software, so an ED-209 outcome is very probable, and highly anticipated.
Lets see it clear a jam tho.
I feel like these will be useless in all but limited circumstances. A modern battlefield in urban centers will be rife with small and large rubble, making these things unreliable in real world practice when you factor its ability to balance navigating obstacles and dealing with recoil. How does it reload? How long does its battery last? What happens when its weapon jams? Additionally, tricking current AI is fairly simple when you have the resources of a modern military.
Anyway, it's interesting to experiment with, but I just don't think the technology is quite there yet. I think it'd probably be more effective to create self-destructing bomber robot dogs than gun toting ones with our current tech.
There's a use case for a crawling camera. They're pretty good at going over rubble if they aren't trying to shoot at the same time. For self destructing drones flying ones are easier and cheaper to manufacture.
I'm less concerned about how these are deployed against soldiers as I am about how they're being provided to police departments as they are in the US.
Ding ding ding. Rubble-covered battlefields aren’t the end-goal here. The end goal is urban warfare, precision strikes, and area denial by police. Cops can post these on patrol outside of a billionaire’s house. Charging isn’t an issue, because you can simply have them automatically return to base for charging, and patrol in automatically rotating shifts.
Or have them near protests, and “accidentally” start killing people. When people get upset, cops will go “oops it was a malfunction. Too bad you can’t blame us for that. Because of, ya know, the malfunction. It totally malfunctioned. 100% wasn’t programmed to kill on sight, to break up the protest quickly. Nope, definitely a malfunction.”
You can't stop a mob with live fire. Patrolling though, yeah.
Child holding a teddybear.
ED-209: "Put down your weapon! You have 40 seconds to comply!"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFvqDaFpXeM
Oh, who am I kidding, human cops do exactly the same shit...
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://www.piped.video/watch?v=ZFvqDaFpXeM
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
This is exactly my concern. These little bullet dogs patrolling the street with someone able to take control of the trigger and blame it on a malfunction
Reminds me of the move code 8 part 2