this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
192 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

59296 readers
4365 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

So, they're announcing that they're going to announce something?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Sticking with duck duck go. Not seeing advertising, news or video recommendations based on a one time search in Google is bliss.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

But duck duck go has ads... They are just as search results. My Pihole will actively block access to those links because they are promoted content. They also have a little “ad” tag alongside the post.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

i try từ use it but there's a bunch of shit I can't find and I have to switch to Google

[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Just what I need, another useless search engine.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Correction: An even more useless search engine.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

How do we know that its useless? Is there a beta link you guys are trying?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I've noticed that anything even remotely related to AI gets shit on immediately here on Lemmy. To the point where people will try to claim it's bad at things that people who use it daily know it's decent to very good at.

The users here want very much for LLMs to not be good because they see it as stealing creativity from people and sold back to them and it makes them feel better to try to believe the product isn't good.

That said, I'd prefer to keep my search engine and LLM tools separate.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Very optimistic

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

They need to focus back on the base product instead of adding more features. It has been over 1 year and chatgpt using gpt4 is still crippled to the point of being useless.

The last thing I want is a search engine that works 10 times then tells me to come back in 4 hours to resume searching...

[–] [email protected] 59 points 6 months ago (3 children)

i really don't want anything that further obfuscates the experience of me typing in a word and it showing me pages with that word. and i don't know why i'd want to type a full ass sentence in natural english versus just keywords

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

They’ve probably got enough machine learning to take keywords and figure out intent. That’s essentially what Google does with autocomplete. They (Google) use n-grams. So I expect OpenAI already has this all figured out.

Source: am in SEO

What worries me is AI getting things wrong and perpetuating lies that are also made up via AI (maybe even the same AI). Also, how will their algorithm work? Do they fact check things they display? I hate Google, but at least they do have somewhat of a push to ensure authority and trust via their algos.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What would open AI offer that Google aren't doing? I feel like they keep fixing something that wasn't broken and now they can't go back to the old good search engine.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Well, they could potentially pull from various sources to make a cohesive answer. Right now Google’s SGE (search generative experience, their AI in organic search) pulls one source to answer and then offers some other links that also answer the same question.

I completely agree with you though. Shit is getting worse for no reason other than $$$$$$$

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Hopefully new competitors on the market will all have to try their best before they start being shitty.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You don't type questions into search engines? I've been doing that for well over a decade and it helps find others asking the same thing.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I find that I have to do that now, because it seems the internet has been geared towards people that think you have to ask the computer a question instead of searching for key words like how it used to work.

I find it more difficult now because often the search results are what the search engine thinks I want, instead of what I actually asked for.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

it seems the internet has been geared towards people that think you have to ask the computer a question instead of searching for key words like how it used to work.

I mean, this is what we see/read in sci-fi series and movies at least since the 60's.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

And I prefer it the other way.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago

If it's using AI then it'll suck just as much as friggin Google.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I am honestly a little confused, what are they trying to bring to the table that isn't covered by Bing Chat AI already?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

If it is just a repackaging of ChatGPT's existing "search the web" function, I don't know why they'd bother. It can at best summarize a page of search results for a very literal-minded query, and even then it's often lobotomized by the fact that OpenAI has made it easy for a large number of top websites to opt out of having their pages accessible to their search crawler, which means you're only getting a summary of the search result snippet and metadata. A competent user of Google search can run rings around it in terms of research, even with Google's decline in quality. I guess it makes it faster to answer basic queries for recent information not in the training data, but that hardly seems worthy of a big event.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Having weird duplicate products is not unusual at Microsoft. It probably would have been better for everyone, including shareholders, if they’d been broken up or spun off divisions as they grew.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

If they had spun off Windows and Office into independent companies, Windows would have made a competing office suite and Office would have made a competing OS

[–] [email protected] 38 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Info enshittification can mean only one thing: full scale invasion. Apparently

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Is this going to be the mule produced by breeding OpenAI with the Bing team?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

I can hear it braying from way down the road, dropping steaming loads of marketing as it comes to stink up the place kicking children in their teeth, all while making billions from it in the process. Heee hawwww .

[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago (3 children)

So all the AI enshittification of Google results was just 4D chess all along!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Top execs got fat off firing people and offshoring while new marker participant obtained what appears to a lead in their core business lol

Let's see how this plays out.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Hmm.

Interesting idea. I mean, if you are a corporate competitor, why not? Especially if you injected the static into the blood stream.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Wym?

Open ai is "owned" by Microsoft so no, google are just shooting themselves in the foot with shitty search results

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It'll herd users to the new product. It's like when reddit enshittified its mobile web page to move folks to its app. Both reddit; but they shot themselves in one foot to shift weight over to the other foot.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Are you saying Google is herding their users to the new product of their competitors? I honestly don't understand what point you're trying to make here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Sorry, initial post was meant to be more cheeky than anything else: Basically saying AI folks like OpenAI have seriously damaged the quality of Google's search results, and in doing so established demand for a new search option... and now they're announcing a competitor to Google.

One foot (google) was shot to shift traffic over to the other (whatever this new shit is). Wasn't meant to imply Google is in on it... the reddit analogy might just be muddying the waters, but the analogy was reddit as a company to search engines as a category.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think the point they're trying to make here is they don't like reddit's app

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Well no... but also yes!

[–] [email protected] 230 points 6 months ago (10 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Sign up here.


The original article contains 3 words, the summary contains 3 words. Saved 0%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I'm pretty sure the original article had more than three words mate . Also good bot .

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Did the bot read a pay wall or is it an accurate summary?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

I guess it's better than .... "On your knees meatbag"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago

The irony here is palpable

[–] [email protected] 37 points 6 months ago

The future is AI.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 6 months ago

Right to the point, good summary mate!

[–] [email protected] 74 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 65 points 6 months ago

I thought it was a really good representation of the OpenAI search engine.

[–] [email protected] 107 points 6 months ago

Ok but this is hilarious lol