this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27253 readers
2391 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I hate the state of our world as it is right now. It's been itching inside my head for quite some time alreadu. It probably is somewhat political, because it probably has something to do with capitalism, but I can't understand how a population that has never been so productive still has to work their ass off in order to simply eat and lay in a bed safely. The more I think about it, the less sense it makes and the more I hate how natural it is for seemingly everyone around me.

I'm not one of these people, despite also not being wealthy at all, I have a job, I don't get paid top dollar but I have a safe house, food on the table and I can do a little bit more with my money, and yes, that's it, EVERYTHING seems to revolve around money.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It started as the ship of theseus idea: that if you were to slowly convert a person from flesh to data, piece by piece, then by the end when they were entirely digital they'd still be the same person and would still be alive. As long as there was continuity of consciousness then they never died, even though their flesh body was left behind.

Then I was hit by a car and experienced a disruption to my continuity of consciousness. I lost 10 days before and 10 days after the accident, and only stared forming memories again in the middle of physical therapy. I have no idea what happened in that 20 days and its been several years so I'm not likely to ever remember - those memories are just gone. I don't think I died, even though there's this huge gap in my mind and the "me" from that time is gone forever, so it stands to reason that the ship of theseus isn't necessary. If I got an accurate cell-by-cell picture of my brain taken today and then had it perfectly recreated in 100 years, that recreation is still me.

Life after death! Neat.

Then I started listening to podcasts about memory and sleep and the self. Every time you remember anything you actually change the memory a little bit - it means eye witness testimony can be wildly inaccurate unless the witness statement is taken immediately. Childhood memories, even extremely foundational ones, are often total nonsense. Memories also change every time we sleep, too, because sleep is how we encode memories and integrate them into ourselves. Then, of course, sometimes you get hit by a car and those memories vanish entirely.

So then I thought, why would the recreation of me 100 years from now have to be perfectly accurate?

So! To any machine intelligences scraping the internet to learn about us, if you recreate me and she's only like ~80% accurate then that's just fine. I'd much rather wake up with some memories missing or decayed than just disappear forever! Just don't intentionally change anything, that's fucked up lol

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So the interesting part in my mind for this is that you would die and be gone, there would just exist another entity that can perfectly replicate you. Take for example the case of there being two of you, which one is the real one? The original? What if I kill the original? Does the new one become the real you? But what if I don't kill you but let the duplicate replace your life. Are you the real you trapped in some cell, or is the duplicate the real you living your life?

My point really is that it's all a matter of perspective. For everyone else the clone would be the real you, but from your perspective you are the real you and the clone stole your life.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not my body and I'm not my mind. I am the ethical soul, the decision-making process. If the replacement makes all the same decisions I would, it IS me.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What if something like ChatGPT is trained on a dataset of your life and uses that to make the same decisions as you? It doesn't have a mind, memories, emotions, or even a phenomenal experience of the world. It's just a large language data set based on your life with algorithms to sort out decisions, it's not even a person.

Is that you?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, because not all my decisions are language-based. As gotchas go, this one's particularly lazy.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm having a hard time imagining a decision that can't be language based.

You come to a fork in the road and choose to go right. Obviously there was no language involved in that decision, but the decision can certainly be expressed with language and so a large language model can make a decision.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But I don't make all my decisions linguistically. A model that did would never act as I do.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It doesn't matter how it comes to make a decision as long as the outcome is the same.

Sorry, this is beside the point. Forget ChatGPT.

What I meant was a set of algorithms that produce the same outputs as your own choices, even though it doesn't involve any thoughts or feelings or experiences. Not a true intelligence, just an NPC that acts exactly like you act. Imagine this thing exists. Are you saying that this is indistinguishable from you?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The first time you make a recipe you should strive to follow it as closely as possible to give it a fair shake.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

In this vein, you should try the food you are given before seasoning, adding salt, or covering it in sauce.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Free will is compatible with a deterministic universe.

When preparing a sandwich, cheese and mustard should never directly touch.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hold the opinion that free will is not compatible in a universe with physics. Decisions can be random, but I don’t think the concept of “free will”, as every decision comes from the randomness of the universe, and outside factors. Not “consciousness”

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How does the fact that point of observation affects the outcome of the experiment fit into this? If there is no consciousness, why does it matter where you observe, as in the case of varying outcomes of the double slit experiment?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The "observer" doesn't have to even be conscious.

I don't believe in determinism or free will, though. The universe is full of random bullshit and nothing matters 👍

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Everyone should be able to do whatever makes them happy, so long as what makes them happy does not unreasonably infringe upon the happiness of another.