this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
159 points (97.6% liked)

News

23259 readers
3404 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The judge overseeing Donald Trump's criminal hush money trial on Thursday signaled he might impose more fines on the former U.S. president for violating a gag order that prohibits him from talking about witnesses and jurors.

Justice Juan Merchan challenged a defense assertion that Trump did not violate the gag order when he said the Manhattan jury in the first criminal trial of a former U.S. president was picked from a heavily Democratic area. “I’m making an argument that he didn’t,” Trump lawyer Todd Blanche told the judge.

“Well I’m not agreeing with that argument,” Merchan responded without saying whether or when he would impose a fine.

Prosecutors are asking Merchan to fine Trump $4,000 for violating the gag order four times last week. In one instance, the Republican Trump said in a TV interview that "that jury was picked so fast - 95% Democrats. The area's mostly all Democrat."

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

https://abcnews.go.com/US/secret-services-prepares-potential-trump-contempt-order-hush/story?id=109542824

Even his detail is thinking he's going to be detained at some point because of his dumbass legal moves.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

"the jurors were picked from a heavily democratic area"

That's... how things are supposed to work

[–] [email protected] 35 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I bet he would ease up a bit if he was thrown in jail for a night.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I bet people would give him even more money if they stuck his ass in jail.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

But he'd still have to sit in jail right?

I don't care if he gets 1 billion in donations if he gets to experience consequences for once.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Just put him in the clink to cool off for 72 hours.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The reason the judge isn't going gung ho, is because he has to escalate the consequences. You can't just go full force or you risk the trial

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is utter nonsense. Judges can enforce their courts. Period.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Imagine if you went in for a road ticket, you say something arrogant to the judge, and the judges tosses you in jail. Is that reasonable? Or would a warning or fine be the first step? If you go all the way right away, you're gonna get called biased, you're gonna get everyone in the political side riled up, you put the jury, prosecutors, etc in danger. I know you wish they could just ignore all that but that can't. This is a special circumstance and a special defendant, of course there's a double standard.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Isn't it the 9th gag order on Trump? He'd have been jailed already

[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Just take away his phone. He'll be in hell. He posted at 4 am that Sleepy Joe was asleep.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 6 months ago (3 children)

the guy just lost 500 million ... how the fuck can anyone look at these rich fucks with a serious face and fine them a few thousand? they have to know the fines are beyond useless. its a joke.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The law specifically sets the fine at max $1000 per offence. The judge doesn't have the authority to set higher fines.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is simply half true.

The judge can jail trump.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Sure, but when Trump violates again, that doesn't give the judge anything else to escalate to.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

But he was already fined once, the judge can absolutely escalate to jail time now... But Trump is untouchable apparently, so he keeps imposing meaningless fines

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

He didn’t lose $500M, although his bond insurer probably lost $175M. If he loses appeal, he’ll be on the hook for the difference, and never make good on the bond repayment.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

that bond is invalid, they are going to take properties worth the 500m minus whatever cash he can scrounge up

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

of fucking course. thanks!

[–] [email protected] 57 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

$1000 per instance of contempt is the maximum fine by statute (which yes, means it only punishes the poor). Its possible to be jailed as well, but I think the judge doesn't want to jump to that too eagerly given the circumstances.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 6 months ago (4 children)

How many warnings before it's okay to jail him? I want a number. Not from you because I know you're just spitting facts, but I just want somebody to draw a fucking line in the sand now so we can jail him when he crosses it. Because this is what, 12 counts of contempt he's been fined for? 13? How many times does the average person get fined for this before getting jailed?

Merchan is going way too fucking easy on the orange shit stain.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Fuck a line in the sand, I want to chisel one in the granite. Make that 4 in an enclosed figure around him and if he crosses any of them he gets shot like a puppy or a goat.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It’s not worth the risk of giving the defense cause for mistrial by jumping to jail time too quickly. This has to be as moderate as possible, and Merchan is doing exactly that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It’s not worth the risk of giving the defense cause for mistrial by jumping to jail time too quickly

He's already been fined for 9 counts of contempt of court, would prison time after that really count as "going too quickly" ?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Yes, it is. It’s standard procedure for the judge to follow the recommendations of the prosecution. Merchan has now set the expectation that further infractions could lead to a jail sentence.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Let's be fair (though I hate to be). The first hearing, at which trump was warned that he was definitely violating the gag order and could go to jail for continued violations, was earlier this week. These particular four infractions occurred last week, so he'll likely just get another fine.

I'm kinda curious whether he'll actually pay his fines.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

I'm kinda curious whether he'll actually pay his fines.

The fines will be paid, but likely reimbursed by some donor, or by hiking the rent that the Secret Service pays at Mar-a-lago or some bullshit like that.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

I didn't know that detail. It's a very relevant piece of context, so thanks.

Does anyone know what the general rules and expectations are for paying this fine to a NY court? It kinda feels to me like there should be a pretty quick due date on that, like a week or something. I get that not everybody will have a couple thousand liquid right away, so I don't expect "by the end of the business day" or anything, but at the same time it is a jailable offense.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I think it's ultimately the judge's discretion and there is no line in the sand. I assume he is wary of the public perception, but damn if it doesn't just highlight the fact that there is a separate system of justice for "them" and "us".