this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Creepy Wikipedia

3907 readers
2 users here now

A fediverse community for curating Wikipedia articles that are oddly fascinating, eerily unsettling, or make you shiver with fear and disgust

image

Guidelines:
  1. Follow the Code of Conduct

  2. Do NOT report posts YOU don't consider creepy

  3. Strictly Wikipedia submissions only

  4. Please follow the post naming convention: Wikipedia Article Title - Short Synopsis

  5. Tick the NSFW box for submissions with inappropriate thumbnails.

  6. Please refrain from any offensive language/profanities in the posts titles, unless necessary (e.g. it's in the original article's title).

Mandatory:

If you didn't find an article "creepy," you must announce it in the thread so everyone will know that you didn't find it creepy

image

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Read at your own risk, as some reviewers wrote, you can't unknow things once you learn them, and this movie's description is all of the terrible things.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I watched this immediately after a non-theatrical release became available. Was honestly disappointed. Not only for having no artistic value or merits as a film whatsoever (not like I expected it to be) but the fact that it wants to be edgy yet pulls their punches.

For example, in the "newborn porn" scene, you don't actually see anything. It just shows the lead's reaction to what was heavily implied to be fetus buggering. There's also a ton of cutaway shots from the violent scenes... like the penis-in-the-eye-socket, from what I remember he was just yanking on the guys head and we get a shot from behind of his dick exiting through the skull in cartoonish fashion.

I mean the target market of this movie are gorehounds looking for their next high, so why hold back? August Underground has a similar scene to the newborn porn one.

That being said, you're not missing anything if you don't see this. It's garbage. Some "controversial" films are actually "good" and worth experiencing like Salo, House That Jack Built, Martyrs, or In The Realm of the Senses. This one isn't.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

whom he kills by shoving his erect penis into his empty eye socket.

Oh, is it Thursday again?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

It has been almost 10 years now since I had first heard about the plot of this film, and I can say 10 years later with even more so awareness and disgust at the capacity for human shit, this plot manages to disturb me as much as it did back then.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

jesus christ, what did i just fucking read

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

you're lucky to have read about it before (not) watching it

somebody gave me the movie without any warning. It's a horrible experience. It must be the most disturbing film i've ever watched

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Can't imagine anyone reading the description and wanting to see any of that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

the description is worst than the movie. Yes there is a couple of crazy scenes but it's mostly boring and honestly I didn't really got it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

The ending was awful though. That part got me.