this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
479 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

71986 readers
2751 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago

Fine do whatever you want to your shit company stop forcing me to use copilot on everything. This is worse than the failed clippy

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only hope for Microsoft is if Xbox takes over all of Microsoft and transforms the whole company

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

Windows is already garbage when humans are codeding it.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yuuuup this is my company too. They’re monitoring our GH Copilot /Cursor usage and they’re going to apply to our performance reviews

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Malicious compliance time, full-on Vibe coding, just accept all changes. Who cares about optimisation, readability, or documentation. You're using AI anything goes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

I feel like this is going to cause so many problems in the near future. They’re not ready for it and they don’t even know.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 day ago (6 children)

They must really want their workforce to be less efficient while dramatically lowering quality and security across the board.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They are banking on the AI will eventually be smart enough that it will replace the workers that fed it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hackers are about to have a golden era

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 day ago

How very corporate of them: people don't want to do something? Screw finding out why, let's make it mandatory and poof, problem solved!

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Apparently no longer optional for their customers either, based on how hard they are pushing it in Office 365, sorry Microsoft 365, no sorry Microsoft 365 Copilot.

The latest change of dumping you into a Copilot chat immediately on login and hiding all the actually useful stuff is just desperation incarnate.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

The process to log in to the online portal of Outlook is so bad it's crossed into comical territory. So much friction, only to shunt you to a full screen ~~clippy~~ copilot page.

I'd be curious to know what the usage statistics are for that page. Like, what could a person possibly accomplish there?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago

Corporate monopoly with overpriced products doing corporate shit

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Being judged by a fancy magic 8 ball, the future keeps getting better and better.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 day ago

At your next job interview ask them if they are results driven or methodology driven. "If I were to take twice as long to do something by using a poorly designed tool will I be rewarded or punished?"

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

At my company too but it's owned by yet another cancerous private equity firm so it was expected.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Same at my company. The frustrating part is they want us to use coding assistance, which is fine, but I really don't code that much. I spend most of my time talking to other teams and vendors, reading docs, filing tickets, and trying to assign tasks to Jr devs. For AI to help me with that I need to either type all of my thoughts into the LLM which isn't efficient at all or I need it to integrate with systems I'm not allowed to integrate with because there are SLOs that need to be maintained (i.e. can't hammer the API and make others experience worse).

So it's pretty much the same as it's always been. Instead of making a gallon of lemonade out of one lemon I need to use this "new lemonade machine" to start a multinational lemonade business.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The key highlight being: you don't need more than a gallon of lemonade. I for once wished big corps heard their engineers and domain experts over wall street loving exec's.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Why would they do that? If they're making better quarterly results by listening to Wall St, that's what the system tells them to do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Chowtime boys 🐕

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

Yes but can it tell the business why it can't deliver on time with they change the requirements 3 different times?

[–] [email protected] 136 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I had an interesting conversation today with an acquaintance. He has sent his resumé to dozens of companies now. Most of them, but not all, corporate blobs.

He wondered for a while just why the hell no one is even reaching out (he's definitely qualified for most of the positions). He then came to the idea to ask a particular commercial Artificial Stupidity software to parse it. Most of those companies use that software, or at least that's what the vendor says on its website. Turns out, that PoS software gets it all wrong. As in: everything. Positions and companies get mixed up, dates aren't correctly registered, the job descriptions it claims to have understood only remotely match what he wrote. Read: things even the most junior programmer with two weeks of experience would get right.

And it is getting used pretty much by every big firm out there.

Oh and BTW: There is ONE correct answer to the phrase 'using AI is no longer optional' : Fuck you.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's not AI. That's just ATS. And it's been shit for years. Definitely, definitely, make sure your resume is ATS compatible. Use the scanners.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I’m gonna be looking for a new job soon and I’ve been reading stuff like this more & more. Makes me really scared. I guess reaching out to recruiters directly via LinkedIn is more important than ever. I also hope the AI software hasn’t made its way down to small/medium-sized companies yet, since those are the ones I’d rather work for anyways

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Your resume is ATS compatible. that's a non-negotiable point nowadays.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

small/medium sized companies

Sadly, those are worse. Since they don’t have the staff or expertise, most of the time they outsource to larger companies… that use AI. I’m almost 99% positive at this point if any of the sites use Workday, it’s getting parsed by an AI because that’s what ours does and it’s a PITA.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Good luck with that Microsoft

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›