without me thanks. Morrowind's Bethesda is apparently long dead
this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
22 points (68.3% liked)
Technology
59429 readers
3081 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
And what are the odds it's running on the zombie of Creation engine again? That was just delightful for Starfield.
As much as I want this to be true, I'll have a hard time not filing this under "GRR Martin and Patrick Rothfuss cowriting a new series" level of believing it will finish any time soon.
“Developers, who aren’t allowed to be critical of company, are having fun.”
Considering how buggy the release builds are I can't believe they're having that much fun.
"love the game even with half of the textures and t-shape npcs!"
Forget the release builds. Bethesda full releases are usually buggy as hell. Fallout 3 and Skyrim on PS3 were nigh on unplayable at release.
on PS3
Found the problem.
Bruh Skyrim released 2 years before the PS4. FO3 releases 5 years before the PS4. If Skyrim had issues running on PS3 on release it shouldn’t have been released for it at all. This isn’t a Cyberpunk 2077 situation where they could have just gone with a current gen release only.
If you were taking shit about consoles in general versus PC then carry on.
If you were taking [sic] shit about consoles in general versus PC then carry on.
Always. 🤌🏽
Your original comment is still oddly accurate. The PS3 version was buggier than the 360 version and more prone to memory issues.
But, yeah, definitely get the PC versions of Bethesda stuff, wait for the complete edition to go on sale, then grab the unofficial patch before so much as starting the launcher the first time.
Or, just don't fall for that "consoles are better than PCs" bullshit at all. Don't mistake "convenience" for what it too often is: molding you into a target, captive audience member. (Or worse, a slack-jawed "brand loyal" simp) 🤌🏽
Damn you had to [sic] me. I’m getting fed up with this phone, the keyboard has gone to shit recently.
No judgement, honestly. Just not my words. 🤓🙇🏽♂️
I don't know why anybody downvoted you, but by release build I think we are talking about the same thing.
My comment was basically I don't buy Bethesda products until they've been on the market for at least a year because they're so fucking buggy and I know they're going to go on sale anyway.
please learn from your mistakes, i want this to be good, i really do.
Starfield killed all my hype for Bethesda's future releases. Every step forward comes with a dozen steps back.
How long ago did Starfield come out, like 6+ months ago? And they've basically added an eat button back from previous games on the same engine, then left it to rot.
I can't believe they are already trying to market ES6 and DLC for Starfield without even fixing that trash game first.
I’m inclined to agree. I don’t hate starfield, I really don’t. It may be obvious to others, but I’ve been trying to nail down why. I think a big part of it is the space travel. If a mission isn’t confined to a planet- hopefully an interesting planet, then you find yourself hopping from planet to planet- which means loading screens every time you jump- which kills any momentum that I personally feel. Sure you had to load if you fast traveled in fallout or elder scrolls, but you COULD walk across the map of the whole game if you really wanted to