this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
214 points (100.0% liked)

News

30711 readers
3411 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

All money paid to South Carolina lawmakers while they aren’t in session has been stopped by the state Supreme Court as the justices sort through a lawsuit from one of their members, alleging legislators improperly gave themselves an $18,000-a-year raise.

The raise is what is called “in-district compensation” — money set aside for legislative duties that has few limits on how it can be spent and requires no receipts or other documentation.

Lawmakers voted, in the budget set to start July 1, to increase it from $1,000 a month to $2,500 a month for all 46 senators and 124 House members.

Republican Sen. Wes Climer sued his colleagues, saying the raise violates the state constitution, which bans the legislature from increasing their per diem during their terms. House members would get 18 months of the extra money and senators would get more than three years of payments before facing reelection.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

Take your time deliberating.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

Holy mackerel! A Republican actually doing what the party talks about, that's a miracle. Can he run for President?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Unpopular opinion, but American politicians are pay extremely low.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

It's stupidly low. It opens our government up to being bought very easily.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

As someone who has casually considered running for office in South Carolina (because our local representative is an incompetent buffoon, and while I don't consider myself qualified to run, I know I could do a better job), I kinda agree. If you want your representatives to be normal people, and understand what reality is like, then you really need to pay them at least a somewhat liveable wage, because as it stands, the only people who can afford to do the job are those who are basically independently wealthy, own a car dealership or some other business that basically runs itself, or are retired. I'm not saying politicians should be making boatloads of money. But their pay should also be a liveable wage for the area they represent.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

People downvoting because they don’t how realise how the politicians got so rich.

Do you have any comparative data on their salaries vs other countries?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They shouldn't have to hustle around trying to secure funding for re-election campaigns. Incumbents and new candidates should be given a budget by the government. Campaign donations shouldn't be allowed at all. Third party campaigning shouldn't be allowed. IDK where the line is that protects freedom of speech while prohibiting third party campaigning but there needs to be one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The line shouldn't be "no third parties". I think it should be closer to "recieve x% of the votes in the last election or y number of signatures and recieve $z for use on your campaign".

This would weed out people from starting a campaign just for the money while allowing third parties to have an even-ish playing field at least in this regard.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

When I say third party campaigning i mean campaigning done by an outside group, that's not affiliated with the candidate's official campaign.

I'm not referring to candidate eligibility

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

And judging by how effective they are, they are overpaid.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They are. As weird as that is to say. It very much contributes, though I would not say causes, the massive unprecedented levels of corruption we see today.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Cuba pays their politicians very low, and expects them to make money doing a regular job, to discourage corruption, and keep politicians in touch with their constituency's needs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Cuba dosen't have a private sector trying to manipulate government officials to change policy in their favor.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

I wonder why? 🤔

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago