this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2024
200 points (86.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43394 readers
1358 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I some times think about it and how shitty people are

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago (2 children)

What has reddit accomplished in over a decade? That place has been nothing more than an escalating demoralization psy-op. It's given the right another central platform to push their ideologies. It's had the left preoccupied with petty squabbles.

Maybe reddit closer to 15-20 years ago would have been able to use reddit to stage actual coordinated worker demonstrations in cities around America. Over the past decade or so they've been keyboard mashing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

It's "accomplished" giving a clear place of congregation to many, many niche communities. It's (anti-)social media; it's not intended to accomplish anything big.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Reddit isn't a "psy-op" but it does intentionally select for the status quo. Once the decision was made to start trying to IPO, radical elements that were anti-capitalist, were purged from all the major sub-reddits. The other radical's drew traffic and were allowed to stay. Once you get rid of anyone advocating for change, of course stagnation is the end result. That's the goal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Well put. Thanks for elaborating.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I remember what she said was embarrassing. The discussion afterwards made me realize how many in that sub really were 'antiwork' in a literal sense, not just about labor protections and maintaining work-life balances.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

The idea of antiwork isn't bad though. We should use anything and everything we can to utilize automation to allow people to live with as little work as possible. Is that a reality today, no. Can it be a reality in the future, maybe. Things will need maintenance and upkeep, people will want to innovate and try to build new things, etc. But that doesn't mean we can't work on things like UBI, free housing, free medicine, free education, etc.

The idea of heading that direction is (what I understood) the main goal. We're just going to need to take steps to get there and changing the terrible labor practices we currently have became step 1 and thus a majority of the focus in the subreddit.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Every movement is going to contain a whole spectrum of voices. Never having to work is pie in the sky but I'll tell you who I'm siding with in the "there should be slaves" and the "people should not have to work at all" argument.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Never having to work is pie in the sky but I’ll tell you who I’m siding with in the “there should be slaves” and the “people should have to work at all” argument.

I'm only 'siding' with people that can recognize that's a very silly false dichotomy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Not a dichotomy. Spectrum. W/e, you don't get it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

... Are YOU the mod from Fox news?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

Yes, there's a rational spectrum of labor protections and social safety nets between the silly extremes you used for your false dichotomy. You've almost got it.

[–] [email protected] 73 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)
  1. Antiwork accomplished nothing of consequence aside from embarassing itself.

  2. That mod didn't represent a huge chunk of the community that was in that sub which is why people broke off to form another sub that did.

The sad thing is that all FOX really had to do is let this mod speak on what their beliefs were. No dishonest editing to make them look bad was needed. They did that all on their own.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The Reddit antiwork community had quite a few ridiculous folks hanging out within it.

Not that getting to a post-scarcity society where people aren't forced to work wasn't a nice horizon-goal to have, but there are a million steps from where we are in the modern world to there, and a lot of those people wanted it done by next Tuesday. And then when you'd point out that was literally impossible, they'd stick their fingers in their ears and make noises. Needless to say, I didn't try to stick around for long.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

people wanted it done by next Tuesday.

me in my 20s

And then when you’d point out that was literally impossible

me in my 30s

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

"Dividing the community" lol. Anti-work is a horrible name.

load more comments
view more: next ›