this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
165 points (94.1% liked)

[Dormant] Electric Vehicles

3193 readers
1 users here now

We have moved to:

[email protected]

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, casteism, speciesism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion.
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling.
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 57 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I just read a whole article about the price of a car and don't know the price of the car. "Journalism"

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (11 children)

I much rather take my old car and pay to have the ICE engine taken out and replaced with a crate EV motor.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

It looks like a Tonka toy

[–] [email protected] 45 points 7 months ago (2 children)

From what I can tell, it’s still in the ~$50,000 range.

I don’t really see how that can be considered ’cheap’.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

And it still harvests all your private information to continually make more money off of you

[–] [email protected] 71 points 7 months ago (3 children)

The best defense, it seems, is a cheap EV of our own.

No shit. Proving yet again that auto industry executives are complete morons waiting for another bailout.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago (7 children)

Chevy has had a perfectly serviceable and low cost EV on the market for years. It's possible to buy them new for $30,000 or less (before rebates) and used ones can be had for under $14,000.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Chevy has had a perfectly serviceable and low cost EV on the market for years

With the caveat that for those years it's been basically unobtainium. I looked into buying one at the start of last year and five dealers all had none in stock + a 6 month wait. (Their websites listed several in stock but we'll ignore that other thorn)

They killed production of it to focus on building luxury SUVs (Cadillac Lyriq) and the Blazer EV (starts $42k), so the stock that exists today is all there is. Used ones exist but the problem is they never actually made them in sufficient quantities to meet demand, and instead of ramping up production decided it'd be better to sell $40k-60k vehicles instead.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Bearing in mind they had them in the early 90s. Then killed them. Twice. Now they’re all “ooohhhh somebody’s doing it better” well of course they are, you quit doing it at all until five minutes ago!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It isn't just about price or being an EV or the Leaf would be the best selling car in the world. People also want a car that isn't a piece of junk with low resale value, is cramped, or has bad styling. These are big purchases and a lot more thought goes into buying them than two simple checkboxes.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Automakers don't care about the used market in the same way video game makers or authors don't. They only get money from the initial sale. Everyone is trying to move to a subscription model to capture some of that revenue. No such thing as a 'used' League of Legends copy.

There are tons of affordable used EVs under 30k. Most of them just don't happen to be made anymore or have any parts availability without a fabrication shop.

The Bolt is nice, but it's crazy that it doesn't have much competition in the US.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Automakers do care about the used car market. Otherwise reliability would go out the window. There's a reason Toyota is the #1 manufacturer in the world.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

There’s more than 1 reason.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, I don't know why everything is moving toward that ugly crossover form. They're ugly as sin IMO.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I think it's worse than them being ugly. I think the dimensions and visibility for crossovers makes people worse drivers. Massive blind spots, zero rear visibility, huge amounts of body roll in curves, and the danger of rollover are all worse in this body scheme.

It's so bad that they have to add technology like rear cameras, BLIS, and traction control to attempt to fix it because they can't just make a car with reasonable dimensions and good sight lines.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The MachE doesn’t really suffer from any of those issues. I had no major blind spots, in fact smaller than what I’ve been used to. Rear view mirrors were very effective, it’s a “Mustang like suspension” so it was super stable, to the point of uncomfortably stiff. With the battery pack underneath, the center of gravity makes a roll over extremely unlikely.

Your points are accurate for many other CUVs, especially ICE ones. But not the MachE. It has its own issues mind you. Specifically the suspension being so bumpy it induces car sickness. A, frankly, obscene amount of power which tempts bad driving habits. And the worst central control system I’ve ever experienced.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

I'm glad the MachE doesn't have those issues, but you raise a good point about it having an obscene amount of power. A lot of EVs have way too much power for the average person.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You just listed a bunch of features that are standard on most vehicles these days.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And the reason they're standard is because the cars aren't built correctly

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Rear cameras were mandated after a bunch of kids playing behind their parents car were run over, traction control exists because road conditions change throughout the year in most areas and blind spot monitors exist because all cars have blind spots and it reduces collisions. Saying all cars are built incorrectly with zero supporting argument isn't much of an argument. Cars are safer than they've ever been and much of the sight line issues are related to reinforced pillars to protect occupants in a crash.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 7 months ago (8 children)

Sorry, I forgot the Internet is Serious Business™

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 7 months ago (3 children)

It's the carcinization of automobiles. Tall station wagons are simply the most practical shape for cars to be.

Frankly, the thing that bothers me about the Mustang Mach E isn't the shape, but rather the fact that they desecrated the name of what's supposed to be a low-slung coupe.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

As much as I hate it, having a 50 year old blue collar welder with 2 Chevy trucks parked out front come over and get excited about "The new Mustang" made me realize how perfect that decision was. People can complain about it all they want, but I don't think it would have been anywhere close to being as successful otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Nobody lost money underestimating the American consumer

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Frankly, the thing that bothers me about the Mustang Mach E isn’t the shape, but rather the fact that they desecrated the name of what’s supposed to be a low-slung coupe.

The shape bothers me a lot, but this bothers me more. They could have just called it the Bronco. Or the Fairlane.

But if cars are all going to look like that in the future I guess I'm never buying a car again.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

I would hate this car much less than I do if they had called it anything BUT a Mustang.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

It's much more like a mustang than a bronco. Regardless, If Ford wants to call it a mustang, it's a mustang.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Frankly, the thing that bothers me about the Mustang Mach E isn’t the shape, but rather the fact that they desecrated the name of what’s supposed to be a low-slung coupe.

That...that right there.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The yellow is indeed bad. But it's still one of the better looking EVs...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

He literally just told you

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

I think they told someone else…

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›