this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
685 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4553 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Trader Joe's, SpaceX, and Meta are arguing in lawsuits that government agencies protecting workers and consumers—the NLRB and FTC—are "unconstitutional."

Trader Joe’s has become the second company in a month to sue the National Labor Relations Board for being “unconstitutional,” following the lead of Elon Musk’s SpaceX, as both companies face board charges for firing employees. These two major corporations aren’t alone in attempting to protect their interests by undermining public institutions; Meta is also arguing in an ongoing lawsuit that the Federal Trade Commission is unconstitutional.

A legal expert told Motherboard that these companies are attempting to take advantage of what they believe is a friendly Supreme Court—judges currently lean right by a six-to-three margin—while they can.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

Excuse me? What the fuck? Get the fuck out of here assholes. How did someone not throw this case out? This is why I don't support US companies anymore especially the mega corporations. Good thing I'm not American but good luck to my southern neighbours

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

Some companies, like Starbucks and Trader Joe’s, have sued their worker unions for trademark infringement.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Democracy is unconstitutional. Only old men in robes may decide!

PS: Older article on this most important issue: https://www.thenation.com/article/society/we-are-witnessing-the-biggest-judicial-power-grab-since-1803/

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We should all be gathering torches and pitchforks.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Why revert to old tech when drones seem to be so effective?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's like we're being invaded, but it's by corporations instead of an army.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

~~It's like~~ we're being invaded, but it's by corporations instead of an army.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

one time i went to a labor studies department at a Big University and i said "i have a bachelors degree and i think i'd like to maybe go for an advanced degree in labor studies before i find myself singing union hymns on the street corner out of sheer frustration" and we talked for a while about the kind of organizing the professor himself had done and some of his colleagues, and i expressed frustration, then, with the existence of taft-hartley because it hamstrings union organizing so much, and the professor said, i shit you not "we got some good rulings out of the nlrb"

i was flabbergasted. we don't need the nlrb if we can throw wildcat strikes and solidarity strikes, which the NLRB will never support.

all this to say i hope the nlrb is abolished because then the professional labor organizing people won't have an excuse not to attack the real problem.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

INCORPORATION IS A PRIVILEGE

It is far beyond time for these shitheads' privileges to be revoked.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yup. If corporations are people, then where is the death penalty when you actually need it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Exactly! Also, for lesser punishments, maybe sometimes rather than meaningless fines, revoke some patents or trademarks.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

This is the dawning of the Age of Aquarius ♒️

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Have any publications zoomed out further on this subject to include the book publishers trying to squeeze libraries with the costs of ebook lending? And the attempts to funnel money to private schools via vouchers under the auspices of "school choice"? I'm sure there are many other examples to include, but these are a couple that came to mind.

Written well, it could be a great overview or deep dive, and I suspect there are likely a number of books covering different aspects of this as were relevant at the time of their writing.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

why should most of us be worried? most of us can't do shit; they are literally not going to listen to us

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Isn’t that worrisome, though? It’s not as if our complete lack of influence is any reason to just chill out and wait for death. Or maybe it is?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

This is corporatism rather than facism. Don’t be like the anti communist idiot and miss apply the word everywhere like they do with socialist.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

corporatism is indistiguishable from fascism. when corporations rule the state, the state's interests include the maintaining of the corporatocracy, and the corporations serve the state. every social institution becomes subsumed either by the state directly or by corporate interests directly, but regardless of which expression of power seizes the institution, they are serving the fascists state.

qed

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

In a way yes. But also in a way no. As there isn’t a state. There are just corporations. There is no state to feed.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

the state must protect the private property claims.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Why? Can’t corporations simply claim ownership manifest destiny and all that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That lacks imagination. This is America, after all. We can have corporate armies and police.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

the courts are still part of the trappings of legitimacy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Well fortunately I'm entitled to my own opinion and if you knew anything about fascism you would know that corporatism and fascism go hand in hand.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Oh I agree they go hand in hand. But they are not the same thing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, and I know the Mussolini quote you're referencing. Mussolini was deliberately dismissing the several aspects of fascism that made it look re brutal than mere corporatism. The integration of mobilized militias with government, the criminalization of all descent and popular organization, the elimination of out groups, etc.

You're being dismissive of what rights we have to protest and organize. Or the rights of some people to just exist. Guessing you don't use them so why would you appreciate them.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Only person that is dismissing others rights, like individual opinion, is you.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

To paraphrase James Baldwin, 'we can love and disagree with each other, as long as that disagreement isn't about my humanity and right to exist'

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

well, we failed to solve for prevention of the 'billionaire' class, so they are going to use those funds to dismantle democracy.

we got what we paid for.

load more comments
view more: next ›