this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
447 points (94.4% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

60108 readers
217 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Jack Ryan S3 E3

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jaykay@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And here is me, not being able to find Jack Ryan anyway lol

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BudgieMania@kbin.social 98 points 1 year ago (6 children)

The tradeoff kinda made sense at the dawn of streaming, when the transaction was basically trading quality for better pricing and convenience.

Nowadays? Yeaaaaah I don't know about that chief

Crazy to think that we lost all the advantages that streaming offered, kept all the disadvantages, piled on a few more disadvantages on top of that, and people went "sure that makes sense 24 bucks a month worth it bro"

[–] nicetriangle@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago

All these companies play the frogs in a pot game. Slowly make things shittier and shittier in tiny increments and everyone's sitting there in boiling water eventually like "this is fine." I mean there's still people with cable TV in 2024. And Netflix has done nothing but get worse for the last 3-4 years and their subscriber count just had a decent boost last year so they were like "lol sweet, we're canceling basic ad free tier in 2024, eat shit"

It's felt pretty damn nice to finally give all these companies the boot. They got too greedy. But there'll still be hordes of people just happily paying an ever rising price for this stuff I guess.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But isn't the "alternatively sourced" a rip from Amazon prime?

But indeed on my Android tv if I use Amazon prime most of times it decides to use 720p with a low bitrate

[–] accideath@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A lot of "alternative sources" are BluRay or even 4K Bluray rips. Of course there oftentimes also are Prime Video or Netflix rips but that just depends on availability. Usually there’s a choice. You can also download rips that are more compressed than Netflix would ever be but if you’re out for quality you just don’t download those unless there’s nothing better available.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 84 points 1 year ago (3 children)

streaming just has godawful UX now as well. the apps play you commercials while in the menu, you have to worry about buffering, you aren't allowed to take screenshots (which is the most numbskulled DRM i've ever seen; they allowed it in the old days and everything was fine AND either way people have ALREADY managed to rip and share the raw footage. what's the point??), 75% of the fucking content on amazon you have to pay an extra fee for, media appears and disappears at the whim of pigheaded suits, prices go up every 6 months because fuck you, the blindingly stupid netflix 'single family home' restriction....

watching tv is meant to be fun, not introduce a whole other layer of bureaucratic bullshit into our lives

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Wow that is absolutely ridiculous, thanks for sharing

[–] 7u5k3n@lemmy.world 124 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Man... Im watching Stargate sg1 with my kiddo. My Plex server is down for a bit.. so I switched over to prime for an episode or two..

It's dark, it's audio is horrible, it's 4:3 formatted it's horribly compressed and it has commercials.

Talk about a poor viewing experience.

Not watching is better than watching...

[–] WallEx@feddit.de 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You shoukd consider cancelling prime, bezos doesn't need more moneys ^^

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kumatomic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's what I'm watching right now too! I rewatch every year or two.

[–] 7u5k3n@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Such a great universe! :)

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

"it's a strange game. The only way to win is not to play."

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Stargate was 4:3, so there's that....

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] plz1@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

SG1 was shot in 4:3 until like season 8 or so.

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

SG1 was shot in film and mastered in 16:9. 16mm in the first 3 seasons, 35mm 3-7, and then they moved to digital HD cameras season 8 onwards.

Many shows from the 90s were [edit: shot on film]. That's why you can get a widescreen HD release of Seinfeld, among others.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

SG-1 was shot in widescreen from day one, on cameras that had framing marks for 4:3 and 16:9. A 4:3 cut was sent to TV networks and a 16:9 cut was canned until the show was released on DVD.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Unless they were shooting with anamorphic lenses, that's still cropping 4:3 to 16:9.

The real issue is that AFAIK the show's never been remastered from film. All we have are DVD transfers - and filters on top of that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments