this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
1449 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59161 readers
1945 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Mozilla ends partnership with Onerep due to CEO's ties to data broker
  • Onerep's data removal service bundled into Mozilla's Monitor Plus subscription
  • Onerep CEO admits to owning people-search websites, leading to end of partnership with Mozilla. Transition plan in progress.
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 132 points 7 months ago (9 children)

People. This is talking about the CEO for Onerep, not the CEO for Mozilla.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Looks like Mozilla will always depend on that google check lol.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The headline is ambiguous here. The CEO in question is from Onerep, not Mozilla.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And that is not related to the comment. If this partner is gone, Firefox lost a big deal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This CEO has been a problem from day one, and there needs to be a movement to get rid of them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Didn't the CEO recently step down or am I confused?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 92 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I’ve always been doubtful about these privacy “protection” services. Giving a bunch of personal data and money to a commercial entity making seemingly dubious claims it can compel other services to remove your data has never seemed like a great idea. Data is the new oil, it’s incredibly valuable, and there is too much incentive for companies like that to become just another data collector.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 7 months ago

The "incentive" is just greed. Customers could be paying a million dollars a month and there will still be some greedy, slimey executive pushing "if we sold their data too we could make a million and one dollars off them each month".

[–] [email protected] 106 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If only politicians were held up to the same standards when it came to being in positions of conflict of interest.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago

We’d have to abolish everyone currently in office and start over.

Which would be beautiful.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›