this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
164 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19080 readers
3569 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Mike Johnson all but said he has the Democratic votes to avoid the fate of his predesessor. This might be the "Sedition Caucus"'s death knell if he's right. This is basically all their leverage.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

Or, vote him out and make so much fun of him that he quits too, putting congress closer to a dem majority.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 7 months ago (1 children)

A motion is basically a consideration and an opportunity for a press conference. She didn’t actually kick off a vote, she’s only asking “should I kick off a vote.”

This smells like MTG just wanting attention again.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

deleted by creator

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

Godspeed, MTG, and good luck! Eat yourself alive GOP

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago

The leopards 🐆 are coming…

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

In other news: The leopard population has exploded due to a near unlimited supply of faces.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

God, the infighting. Maga really can't stand anyone who's not them.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago

you live laugh love to see it.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago

Oh no, they’re eating each other’s faces again and will only make it clearer just how incompetent they are… so anyways, TGIF everyone! What’s the plan for the weekend?

[–] [email protected] 56 points 7 months ago (2 children)

...this plays right into Jeffries and House Dems hands...they can tell Moses if he wants to stay Speaker he's gonna have to offer up the Ukraine funding immediately if you want our votes (or abstentions) to oppose vacating the Speaker's chair

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This motion is not an immediate threat.

The way it was filed lets them bury it in committee, this was only a MAGA warning shot.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And more GOP theater, which they are also very bad at. None of these people have any skills. It's like they grew up licking lead pipes, and still are.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Or sucking on the backs of church pews. Also decent source of lead. Or licking their fingers after loading their guns, or eating fishing sinkers because they look like Hershey Kisses.

There are a myriad of ways that gene splash pad of a caucus could get so dumb, but I’ve already wasted too much life imagining those.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 7 months ago (2 children)

That's the logical play, but they better get the aid up front because Johnson isn't trustworthy and obviously isn't in control of his own party.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But then they could just call another vote for speaker? Not sure this would be the play, but if it was, I don't see he can renege without just incurring the same fate?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Depends on if the House rule is "any Rep can move to vacate" or if it's "any Rep of the majority party can move to vacate."

Though it seems if we wait a few more weeks, that might be the Dems anyway lol.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

deleted by creator

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Yeah that's a good point and I'm not sure of the particulars. However, assuming the hard right still wants to remove him, democrats have the leverage to affect the vote.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

In a functioning congress dealing would make logical sense. The fact that Republicans can't be trusted to follow through on deals makes trying to make deals with them illogical.

Compromise on one specific piece of legislation? Sure, as long as it is checked to ensure no poison pulls were snuck in and the compromise was worth it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This plan is extortion, not dealing. And the assholes Republicans deserve to be extorted, the Dems need to grow a few dozen pairs and give it a shot.