this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
10 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

15649 readers
2586 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

seeking for

  1. Looking for
  2. Seeking

You can choose only one lane.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Looking to seek-for

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Whatever you add to both sides of the equation neutralises each other.

So essentially you don't need it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Knda like AI, nobody needs it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Only when addition have a inverse operation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

If you have a theory of everything, I suspect whatever algebraic structure the terms follow, is at least a ring and therefore has additive inverses.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Even if they had a complete model of all of physics, it still wouldn't answer all questions, as a lot of important data is just random. Whether nature decided to go with D-molecule or L-molecule is essentially random.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

I would argue that the choice of L- or D-molecules is not a physics question so much as a chemistry/biology one.