this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
873 points (92.1% liked)

memes

15447 readers
3733 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Lines that intersect a circle like that aren't "right angles" tho, they're called "normal" to the circle - in other words pointing directly toward the center. A normal line is at right angles to a tangent line, but not to a curve.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Don't the internal angles need to be 90°? Two of those right angles aren't right angles on the inside.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

Okay, calm down Diogenes

[–] [email protected] 8 points 19 hours ago

Not a polygon

[–] [email protected] 19 points 20 hours ago

I'm not a math major, but I always considered it that a square is a special case of rectangle, a rectangle is a special case of parallelogram, and a parallelogram a special case of a quadrilateral, a quadrilateral a special case of a simple polygon.

This shape isn't a polygon, so it cannot be a square.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Didn't a square need broad nails or something?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Diogenes go home.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Rotate the cone towards you.

Now you see this. 🤯

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

uhhh, wait. Under what projection is OP's "square" reduced to an actual square

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It's possible, but there needs to be a thickness in addition to the length and width.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

Im gonna need more than that as an explanation. Sandwiches too if you're making some

load more comments
view more: next ›