this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
448 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

70998 readers
3358 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Guess my next phone is coming from Oneplus or Fairphone.

bUt AnDrOiD!!!

...can be chained to its desk and limited, I agree.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The two thing I use most, by far, from Google, is gmail and basic search.

Gmail, I'm looking to move away from it now, but I currently have every little addition to it disabled. Basic inbox and tags, no automatic filtering, no categories, no nothing.

Search, my browser is set to open the "web" tab with the query, no transformation, no summary, no "for you", no AI garbage, no "we thought you wanted video so there's only video in the replies". It still works fine.

Basically, none of what they added for years… maybe decade at this point, had held a glimmer of interest from me. It feels like this trend will continue. I just want something very basic that works.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Switch over to the Qwant search engine for your basic search and a good email provider like Tutamail or Proton. I have for a few months and there really is no reason to go back. It's simple and it works.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Google did the same thing with Google Plus they went all in on social and it failed miserably

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It was actually a really good product, way better than Facebook, unfortunately if you have a social media platform that's invite only then it's never going to succeed. I really have no idea why they did it like that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Facebook started out as invite only for a few years so they might have been looking to emulate its early trajectory. Gmail also started that way.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Thankfully I’ve been “all out” on Google for some time.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

imagine if a company said they're going all in on quality instead

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

But higher quality ≠ more profits
AI apparently makes investors wanna dump in all their money tho

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

We have to find those investors man… its always those investors investors bla, we have to please them…

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Google has gotten so fucking dumb. Literally incapable of performing the same function it could 4 months ago.

How the fuck am I supposed to trust Gemini!?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I find this current timeline so confusing. Supposedly we're going to have AGI soon, and yet Google's AI keeps telling you to stick glue on pizza. How can both things be true?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Google just released a video generator that is a ball hair away from perfection. The hallucination rate from their latest models is <1% and dropping you just see cherry picked screenshots.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The physics and perspective are still horrible, every video makes me want to vomit my brain

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Only sometimes, with enough generations you can already make indistinguishable videos for the most part. You’re seeing these mistakes because it’s amateurs spending $100 not professionals spending $10k.

Given current rate of pace Veo4 should be out in a couple months.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was referring to the demos shown at I/O, my brain seems to see them all as “flat”, it’s like a reverse magic eye thing. It reminds me of the uncomfortableness of a fever dream. I may be the exception tbf!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I showed this one to my friend and she said 'But they faces aren't AI generated, right?'

https://www.reddit.com/r/aivideo/comments/1kxs6yq/were_cooked_a_zerocost_ai_demo/

There's a bit at the end where the spaghetti disappears, the chef walks away a bit quick while still speaking, but otherwise it's nearly flawless.

For scenes with lots of action and complex physics it's still very noticeable

https://old.reddit.com/r/aivideo/comments/1ktgjwh/pushing_veo_3_to_the_limit/

But it's already good enough to replace several scenes in blockbusters. Dream scenes, cut-aways, etc.

Look at this sausage dog

https://xcancel.com/nmatares/status/1924931844879134804

It even gets the audio right when it moves between hardwood and carpet.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Thanks! These are all great, the details, everything is very clear and crisp compared to before, hardly any garbledy goop, but I can’t shake the vertigo idk

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think image generators are really in the same category though. They'll have their applications but they're not going to be a fundamental change to society the way AGI will be.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It's the same reason why they removed the headphone jacks from phones. They don't want to give you a better product, they want you to force youbto use a product, even if it's worse in all aspects

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I assume it's big tech that has this weird ai they try to sell while the scientists are using different ai for real useful stuff, like the protein something I heard. Or at least that's what I'd like to believe.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

A whole lot of useful stuff that wasn't publicly labelled AI got relabeled to take advantage of funding opportunities. That doesn't mean it is related to generative AI like LLMs and image generators though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I work with ServiceNow for my job and a couple weeks back was the big knowledge 2025 conference in Vegas. The CEO came out for the opening keynote and opened with some like, "ah yea, doesn't it feel good to be an AI company?" and I didn't here a single cheer from the crowd, just polite applause. They have gone all in on AI, have made it completely unaffordable, and have just been shoehorning it into everything. I hope every one of these companies that that goes big on AI crashes and fails. They've already cut the employees, so the only people affected are the ones making the cash, so fuck em.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (4 children)

the fuck does service now even need AI for?

I hate any company I work for that uses ServiceNow. And now it's getting worse??

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

It actually makes a lot of sense. AI is a good use case for case management. The problem is how much you depend on it without human intervention, but even humans fuck up, especially if they’re following the same rules and processes that the AI tool would. The AI tool just gets through cases faster, so in theory you can sus out root causes sooner.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

It already has script automation and has had for years so I'm not sure what AI is going to bring to the table.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

“Bad” is SN’s claim to fame. Everybody hates it. Apparently, the worse they make it, the more companies will throw money at them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You might be joking but I honestly think that's the case. It's wild to me. I've worked for Fortune 500 companies using SNOW and everybody hated it and regularly voiced complaints and issues and yet the company refused to change. Started doing shit like releasing more training docs on how to use it or doing brown bag lunches on SNOW effectiveness.

But ultimately none of that mattered, it is just inherently garbage.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well one of the big problems with it is it's never properly configured. One of the most annoying things that it does is that it generates tasks only when previous tasks are closed, in theory that makes sense but really the result is that you close a task, and then you have to go looking in the ticket queue for the new task it's just generated, so you can close that one too. Total waste of time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I guess that makes some sense, I loathe Jira but I think it's largely because everywhere I've worked that uses Jira has poorly customized it and just ruined the experience.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›