this post was submitted on 28 May 2025
334 points (83.8% liked)

Technology

70529 readers
4034 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 days ago (9 children)

How much old copper piping is still out there that could be replaced by other materials to recover the copper? I'm sure there are other common obsolete applications. The nice thing about metals is that we already have a pretty robust recycling chain in place for them. That plus the remaining supply plus aluminium plus other replacements plus careful design to minimize the use of copper where it's absolutely necessary might be enough to carry us through.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago

Good think we can use aluminum and copper then...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

There could be two ways to address this problem. One is asteroid mining, which has the potential to be extremely lucrative because there are lots of asteroids with huge metal deposits.

Another is discovering new conductors. There's been progress in developing conductive plastics. https://phys.org/news/2022-10-scientists-material-plastic-metal.html

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Well couldn't we, like, share it? The average joe in america is consuming 100 times more than an indian

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago

But that would be unfair to the average Joe! And think about the billionaires; how would they survive if everything was shared? /s

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Sounds like doomish stuff. We innovate all the time. If copper and lithium are short supply items then technology will morph to use something else.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Eh. Or we could just keep some areas impoverished and underdeveloped and profit off their cheap labor...

!remindme 15 years

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This was my first thought, we aren't going to develop the whole world. That's not how this works. Who said that was a goal of... well ... anyone's?

That's a rhetorical question. Frfr tho, does that remind me work on your instance only, or what's the deal with that?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Oh dang time flies when you're having fun exploiting people

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Have they tried pulling it out of the walls of abandoned buildings? There's a lot left in there that no one uses anymore. /s

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

they just need Detroit crackheads. five guys and a week and they'll have every building in Houston stripped.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 5 days ago (2 children)

This all suggests that we keep producing, wasting and manufacturing things infinitely without ever recycling, reusing or re purposing everything that we are mining out of the ground. The article notes that this includes recycling but only at the rate we have now.

If we keep running our world the way we are now for the next hundred yes .... than yes, we are going to run out of everything because we live in an absolutely wasteful society that only runs in a way to produce things designed with planned obsolescence to break down in a short amount of time so that we can produce more junk to sell and drive a stupid economy to make a small group of idiots even more wealthy. The whole system is designed to run on making infinite money by producing infinite junk that doesn't last long.

Yes at the rate we are going and the way we are producing things and the way we shape our economy and the way we base our manufacturing .... we are definitely going to run out of everything.

We can change our economy and the way we produce and manufacture things - and get rid of this stupid structure of society of just endlessly making money for a small group of morons .... or we can keep doing things the way we are now until we run off a cliff and destroy everything and drive our species into extinction.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago

When we run out of things, it's we who run out of things but not those with power to get what they need and kill excess population.

So preaching to them is useless.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

The article notes that this includes recycling but only at the rate we have now.

The original study says they assumed an annual increase of 0.53% as observed over the last 20 years.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›