this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
107 points (99.1% liked)

politics

23602 readers
2272 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Earlier this week, U.S. President Donald Trump announced the "Golden Dome" missile defense project, which he claims will protect the entire country from missile attacks using a network of reconnaissance and strike satellites. According to Trump, the system should be completed by the end of his presidential term at a cost of "just" $175 billion. However, we shouldn’t forget the long history of exorbitantly expensive U.S. failures in missile defense.

Since 1962, the U.S. has already spent over $531 billion on various missile defense systems, none of which have proven effective. To date, the only tangible result is 44 interceptors stationed at airbases in Alaska and California—systems so unreliable that the Pentagon had to sign a new $18 billion contract with Lockheed Martin to develop an entirely new replacement.

Trump claims that past missile defense efforts lacked the necessary technology, but now America possesses "super technologies," including advanced computing, miniaturization, and increased weapon lethality. Yet, these advancements are a drop in the ocean compared to the immense challenges of missile defense. A report by the American Physical Society noted that any conceivable missile defense system could be easily overwhelmed if an enemy launched a salvo of missiles instead of a single one.

Notably, SpaceX may become the frontrunner in developing the "Golden Dome" system. But how transparent is this process? A letter sent to the Acting Inspector General of the Department of Defense by U.S. Congressional Democrats raises concerns that Elon Musk may have unfairly gained access to "Golden Dome" contracts—and their worries are not unfounded. Musk previously partnered with two other companies led by Trump-supporting CEOs to lobby for early-stage contracts on the system.

At this rate, Musk stands to make billions by capitalizing on the myth of a technological solution to nuclear missiles—a solution that, so far, does not exist.

Thus, the "Golden Dome" appears less like a viable missile defense project and more like a financial scam by Trump and Musk to siphon off U.S. taxpayer money.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

Reposting my comment from another thread.

Trump's Golden Dome idea is impossible. The tech and resources to defend even the contiguous 48 states against even North Korea's level of ICBM capabilities does not exist.

The truth is that the whole program is intended to pour federal money into the hands of the wealthy. In fact, Musk already has the lead in providing the system as of this April 17th article from Reuters. And the icing on the cake is this.

In an unusual twist, SpaceX has proposed setting up its role in Golden Dome as a "subscription service" in which the government would pay for access to the technology, rather than own the system outright.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I had a friend who's super into this stuff (he's a furry) break it down. Intercepting rockets is fucking hard, even with computers and advanced sensing and everything we've got on our side, it's really hard. Israel's Iron Dome fails to intercept a pretty large number of rockets overall, and those are much lower altitude, lower speed rockets compared to MRBMs and LRBMs. According to Wikipedia, during the re-entry phase, ICBM warheads are clocking about SEVEN KILOMETERS PER SECOND. The fastest commercially available bullet is the .220 swift, which does a measly 1.2 km/s. So, knocking down these warheads, without considering the countermeasures that we know ICBMs use (chaff, decoy warheads, etc) is like trying to reliably hit a bullet five times faster than the fastest bullet available with another bullet. This is fucking vaporware, much like Musk's hyperloop. We could be focusing on nuclear disarmament and building and iterating on proven tech that we know works, but everything just has to be a goddamn scam.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

I get what you're saying, but did y'all consider "Nuh-uh, Musk is the smartest internet-boi ever, and these will be AI bullets"?

If you really think about it, what does Tesla specialize in? Building cars that accidentally crash themselves and otherwise catastrophically fail in absurd ways. Imagine how easily they could crash into things and cause failures if that were their goal!!!

As a more serious solution, can't we just rub super-cream on loyalists of this administration to give them totally real super powers and then launch them out of cannons to save us from the missiles?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Classic Trump. Find a problem that doesn't exist. Like needing a missile defense program when no one is shooting missiles at us. And then boom, no missiles are hitting us. Trump can declare victory over the imaginary problem.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

I wonder how much he would pay for my anti-tiger rock.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Gee, there was that other guy back when who had an obsessive fascination with wunderwaffen, too. Little mustache. His name's on the tip of my tongue. How did that all work out in the end, again?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

"super technologies"

Someone should write a St. Upid vocabulary translation book.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

When has anything Trump ever done not been a scam? Go on, I’ll wait