this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
89 points (98.9% liked)

Slop.

501 readers
354 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago

"don't you understand the court made a ruling you couldn't exist anymore why haven't you disappeared in a puff of logic!? Oppression!"

Standard liberal hall monitorism turning straight to facism upon facing material reality.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It’s only a matter of time before trans-exclusionists seriously compare themselves to Shoah victims—assuming that they have not done so already.

Although if I’m being honest, they probably think that their experience with the ‘trans lobby’ is worse than the Shoah, the Samudaripen, the Meds Yeghern, the Sayfo, and the Nakba combined.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

The trans right movement doesn't negotiate with terrorists.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Without knowing who this person is, this reads extremely pro-trans

the trans rights movement has no intention of taking no for an answer

YOU'RE GODDAMN RIGHT

We have one group of people demanding that women hand over their legal existence, their rights, their language, their analysis, and their political movement.

Yeah, fuck those people! Trans woman shouldn't have to deal with that shit!

We have another group of people saying no.

"No. Leave trans women alone."

If you think that the end of this should come by unrelentingly pressuring those people's 'no' until they submit, you are in the domination business. It's that simple.

Hell yeah, fuck em up

feminism's prime directive is resisting male dominance

I mean... She obviously means "patriarchy" and not "male dominance," so hell yeah! Gender essentialism serves the patriarchy and must be resisted!!!

Jane Clare Jones: trans rights activist

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago

wHy ArEn'T tHeY fOrFeItInG tHeIr ExIsTeNcE?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

no more half measures walter

trans-gun waltuh anarchy-trans

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago

Oh fuck off. And these terfs are not just trans exclusionary they are also poc exclusionary. What a shocker. It's cis white supremacy at it's core... Again.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

It's so insane how easily-led some people are. We usually relate that "Look out, that guy is going to take part of your cookie" cartoon to the fuck-you rich and everybody else, but it's absolutely applicable to the fuck-you rich and TERFs, too.

"No, we don't need numbers, you'll sink the boat" is such a dumb approach to their so-called principles.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago

Should someone tell her that the rights she supposedly cares about are getting taken away under the guise of "protecting women?"

Like, they're trying to make it illegal to vote if your legal name doesn't match your birth certificate. Got married and took your husbands name? Eat shit.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

mother-jones That's correct.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

TERFs are trapped in a prison of their own making. THEY started this online culture war on trans people, THEY obsess over trans people just existing. I wish these people would all be rounded up and thrown in a gulag. Fucking hell.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

We have one group of people demanding that women hand over their legal existence, their rights, their language, their analysis, and their political movement.

The ability to think that trans women are the ones taking these things away from cis women, and not a group of women who this person is literally arguing should lose all of those things she's so anxious to cling onto for herself, is evidence that transphobes don't share the same reality with the rest of us.

Also I'm pretty sure I got into an argument with this person when I still had twitter and she claimed that reproductive organs were "evolutionarily designed" to produce certain gametes, even if they developed in such a way that they couldn't actually produce any. I should stop letting these fucking idiots occupy any space in my brain

[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago

all transphobes

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago
[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago

We are exhausted

And everyone I know just wants this to be over with so we can get back to getting on with the shit we want to be getting on with.

But the response over the last 4 weeks has made it abundently [sic] clear that the women's suffrage movement has no intention of taking no for an answer.

We have one group of people demanding that men hand over their legal existence, their rights, their language, their analysis, and their political movement.

We have another group of people saying no.

If you think that the end of this should come by unrelentingly pressuring those people's 'no' until they submit, you are in the domination business.

It's that simple.

And I really don't know why you are so surprised to discover that democracy's prime directive is preserving the power of white male landowners.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 4 days ago

the trans rights movement has no intention of taking no for an answer

gigachad-hd

[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 days ago

A mistake many neoliberals make is to assume that when they decided to believe in stagnation and the absence of change, that the rest of us came to the same conclusion. We won't take no for an answer, correct, because we actually believe in justice and not stopping until it has been won.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 4 days ago

This is the same dumbass that transvestigated the new Women’s March logo together with other TERFs and claimed that the face in front must be that of a "man".

Ironically, it turned out that her own face had the exact same shape. But instead of, you know, accepting that her obsession with trans women and phrenology has gone little bit too far, she just quietly deleted her tweets and acted like nothing ever happened.

And yet, even after pulling such an embarrassing stunt, she still has the chutzpe to write this shit.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So many cis feminists (especially whiteys) do not actually oppose oppression—they just oppose oppression that goes after them specifically.

I can tell by how these clowns act like trans women being respected and having rights is somehow mutually exclusive with cis women being respected and having rights.

Little do they realize, transphobia and essentialism are tools of patriarchy, not tools against it, and these things hurt cis women too, but even if they didn't, it wouldn't excuse this transphobic bullshit, obviously.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 4 days ago (2 children)

They don't hate oppression, they hate being oppressed

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

If the boot fits...to the privileged, equality is oppression.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 days ago

When the education is not liberating, the dream of the oppressed is to become the oppressor -Paulo Freire

[–] [email protected] 39 points 4 days ago (1 children)

On some level this person clearly understands trans women are a marginalized minority, because in what other situations do people go into a political battle with enough entitlement to believe the other party will just agree you're right and go home when you're bored with the argument?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

They have no conception of how intolerable conditions actually are for the people they're arguing with. This doesn't absolve them - the ignorance is willful.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Don't! You belong, they don't. One day we will put them in the gui-trans

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don’t want to put them in a guillotine I just want to be left alone.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You'll never get the one without the other

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 days ago