The ballot stated, in part: “Funding to Israel costs $3.8 Billion,” and “Israel is recognized as an apartheid regime with a track record of human rights violations.”

“It was just an incredible effort of a diverse coalition committed to justice, peace and human rights. And it was, it was a united movement,” said Jessica Yasin, a member of Champaign-Urbana Muslim Action Committee.

“It was by not only CUMAC but Urbana-Champaign Jews For Ceasefire […] and countless individuals who believe our tax dollars [should] not fund a country accused of serious human rights abuses.” (ipmnewsroom.org, Nov. 6)

The recommendation has no binding effect on lawmakers, but the organizers hope it sends a message to policy makers that the war in Gaza should end.

Whether or not the proposal impacts legislation, it is a clear indication that there is powerful growing antipathy to the genocide in Gaza and to its cost and its inhumanity. More and more people of different backgrounds but similar passions are willing to struggle together for what they believe in.

While being denied their demand for a full guaranteed pension, workers won a $12,000 bonus and improvements to their 401k individual retirement funds. Nevertheless roughly 40% of the striking union members voted against the latest contract, with pensions likely being a major issue for them.

This Tyrannosaurus rex-style company produces a vast array of military and related technological equipment, including F-15 and F-18 jet bombers and the bombs they drop. These terror weapons are used in Palestine, elsewhere in West Asia, North Africa and the rest of the world to maintain [neo]imperialist rule.

Boeing is the number one military contractor involved in the U.S. genocide against Palestine. The company has used layoffs, outsourcing, threats and a partnership with the government to keep the union in a subservient position and deny workers needed compensation for the last 16 years.

[…]

The strike caused a $6.4 billion loss for Boeing in the third quarter, but Boeing was bailed out by Wall Street when the company was allowed to gain $20 billion with a huge sale of stock in November. This put Boeing in a position to hold out longer against the IAM strike and to refuse the workers’ demand for their full pension.

The strike was an uprising against the vicious attacks that monopoly capitalists imposed on the working class. The IAM was able to respond with a high level of organization and strength on the picket lines for over seven weeks. For weeks before the strike began on Sept. 12, workers marched through their plants daily to raise their demands and build support.

Strikers were encouraged by the growing upsurge of labor in recent years, such as the UAW strike against Ford, General Motors and Stellantis in 2023 and the Starbucks Workers United organizing drive.

The machinists gained strong support from the Society of Professional Engineering Employees in Aerospace (SPEEA), whose members refused to do the Machinists’ jobs during the strike. Striking members from UNITE HERE! (hotel workers) joined the strikers on the picket lines. Running parallel with the lies and false promises of the presidential election, the strike showed that fighting unions can win against the top capitalist monopolies like Boeing.

In total, voters supported legal abortions in 14 of the 17 states where referendums were on the ballot. And in 11 of those 14 states, the constitutions were amended to include the right to legal abortions. These victories, made possible by the organized movement of thousands of activists and voted on by millions of people, should be applauded. Even though it was through the ballot box, in several states reproductive-rights forces beat back the right-wing scheme to outlaw abortions.

But the fight isn’t over in Missouri, home to a conservative government. Planned Parenthood clinics are suing the state to eliminate the maze of rules and obstacles that abortion providers have to navigate to provide abortions, end the restrictions on dispensing medication abortion pills and eliminate criminal prosecutions for abortion providers. (Springfield News-Leader, Nov. 8)

And in Florida, where the state requires a 60% supermajority vote to change the constitution, the measure narrowly failed, gaining 57% of the required votes. Reactionary Gov. Ron DeSantis had vociferously denounced Proposition 4, which would have legalized abortion. So now, without abortion access in that state, a reproductive health care “desert” exists throughout the Southeast.

Throughout the past week, Zionist hooligans have been attacking the people of Amsterdam and causing destruction in the city and its neighborhoods. People walking on the streets wearing keffiyehs, taxi drivers and random Muslims and Arabs have been beaten up by these hooligans. The windows of homes with Palestinian flags were smashed and the flags stolen. The police did not intervene, the media was silent, and the mayor stood by and watched as these Zionist hooligans caused chaos in the city.

Yet how different is the situation after a night in which the people of Amsterdam — Muslims, Christians and Jews, Dutch, Arabs and Palestinians — defended themselves and their city against this violence?! The police arrested dozens of people, the media speaks outrageously with sensationalistic lies, and the mayor speaks of very serious “antisemitic” incidents. It is as if the world turned upside down.

Where in occupied Palestine the [neo]imperialist powers declare their support for the Israeli genocide and fulfill it with military, diplomatic and economic assistance, here in Amsterdam the ruling powers express their support for [neo]fascist Zionist hooligans who attack our city and our people. Where in Palestine, the Palestinian resistance is repressed with life sentences, here the defenders of Amsterdam are beaten up and arrested by the police. These are, we note, the same police forces that were responsible for arresting tens of thousands of Amsterdam Jews during World War II.

The reaction of the people of Amsterdam to the [neo]fascist hooligans is normal and natural. First, because we do not accept any attack on our city and people, and second, because these attacks are racially motivated. It is very clear that the attacks of the Maccabi hooligans are anti-Palestinian, anti-Muslim and anti-Arab. This also makes them anti-Amsterdam, because these groups are a crucial part of Amsterdam, of our city, our people and our community. This whole week, Amsterdammers have been attacked and harassed, and last night they decided to defend themselves and not turn the other cheek anymore.

The self-defense of the people of Amsterdam against [neo]fascist attacks is indeed exactly what we mean by “Globalize the Intifada.” This is part of the boycott movement to isolate and weaken “Israel.” Just as we fight for the exclusion of the Zionist régime from education, culture and sports, we also want [neo]fascist Zionists to have nowhere that they find free rein to celebrate genocide and attack Palestinians, Arabs and entire communities.

The self-defense of the people of Amsterdam also follows months of political and media attacks against Palestinians and their supporters, especially the student activists who have unleashed a student intifada since May. This includes the Dutch entry ban against our European coordinator Mohammed Khatib, which we demand be lifted immediately.

The people of Amsterdam declared last night that Zionism will not be tolerated here. Amsterdam is a Zionism-free city. And if it is not yet, we will make it so.

And no, anti-Zionism is not anti-Semitism. This movement is made up of people of all backgrounds, religions and ethnicities. This movement is a popular movement that is against genocide and wants to liberate Palestine from the river to the sea. This movement is not led by one or even several organizations. It is the masses of Amsterdam and the Netherlands, the so-called “ordinary, hard-working Dutch people,” who defended the city against [neo]fascist hooligans last night.

We call for the immediate release of all those arrested and the dropping of all charges against them. This is the moment to escalate the fight against genocide and for the liberation of Palestine, together against Dutch support for “Israel” and for the total isolation of the Zionist régime, in sports and all other arenas.

The protests defended reproductive rights and protested Trump’s xenophobic immigration policies, such as his plan to order mass deportations and his ban on immigrants from Muslim countries. Also, they demanded the government cancel student debt, protect the environment, raise the minimum wage and affirm the rights to organize unions and to bargain collectively.

Besides the street protests, unions issued statements responding to the challenges of Trump 2.0. The AFL-CIO wrote, “Now we are faced with the reality of a second Donald Trump term. The Project 2025 agenda promises to dismantle labor unions.” The federation goes on to say that “labor’s task will be to defend working people.” (aflcio.org, Nov. 6)

The AFL-CIO statement explains, “It is clear that the economic struggle working-class people are facing is causing real pain, and neither party has sufficiently addressed it.”

The American Federation of Teachers said: “Our guiding principle will be to continue to do the work to improve people’s lives: to fight for our children’s future.” (aft.org, Nov. 6) Trump plans programs that put AFT members in the administration’s crosshairs twice — most are public employees, a particular target of the MAGA movement, and educators, another target.

The context of these statements is that most of the organized labor movement mobilized time and funds for the election of the Democrats, and this effort failed. For example, union members knocked on a million doors in Pennsylvania and lost the state. Labor spent $47 million, engaged in phone banks, canvassing operations, education and persuasion efforts with their members and outreach to nonunion working-class households to no avail. (opensecrets.org)

These statements analyze the current political situation from the labor movement’s perspective but contain no call to action.

Professional Staff Congress, NYC

Professional Staff Congress in anti-Trump march, New York City, Nov. 9, 2024. Photo: PSC/CUNY

AFT Local 2334, also known as the Professional Staff Congress (PSC), which represents 30,000 full-time and adjunct professors, librarians, laboratory assistants and some technical staff at the City University of New York, made an analysis of the dangers the victory of Donald Trump represents for the New York City working class.

Union President James Davis said in a message to PSC members: “It is a wake-up call for organized labor that Trump’s movement has effectively harnessed such broad support of working people and the poor. … [Trump] and his acolytes aim not only to discredit and defund educational institutions but also to undermine the values and principles on which the public education system is built.” (psc-cuny.org, Nov. 6)

The PSC not only issued a statement, it joined a march of 5,000 protesters on the Trump International Hotel with a coalition of community groups, including Make the Road (Se Hace Camino Nueva York), the Working Families Party, Jews for Justice, other unions and other groups. The protesters are part of “Protect Our Future,” a coalition in formation.

The PSC is also actively fighting for a contract with picket lines and civil disobedience at CUNY board meetings. The union’s old contract expired in early 2023.

(Emphasis original.)

Dan Shae, president of Portland Veterans for Peace, shown above, said: “We need to put maximum pressure on the Biden Administration in the next two months he has left to right his wrongs on Cuba and to close the Guantanamo Bay Industrial Prison Complex, among others.”

For some time, the 30 men still detained at Guantanamo have been approved for release by a high-level U.S. government review process. However, after the October 7 Hamas uprising, the President Joe Biden administration refused to release them. Of the 30 prisoners, 16 have been waiting two to four years to be released and three for nearly 15 years.

There is a protective order in place that prevents attorneys for the prisoners from talking about the injustices taking place. The gag order is a further indictment of the U.S. government for how it operates at Guantanamo.

From Palestine to Guantanamo, stop the U.S. War Machine!

The demonstration rallied at the base of the Space Needle and marched downtown. It was called by the International League for Peoples Struggle, an internationalist organization with many Filipino members. The lead banner read, “Build the Peoples Movement — Fight Repression, War & Genocide!”

Other march banners read, “U.S. Out of Everywhere — Cut Ties with Boeing — Free Palestine” and “Immigrants Fight Back.” Large numbers of immigrant rights supporters were on the march, protesting Trump’s threat to deport thousands of immigrants with national guard troops.

Speakers included a spokesperson for SUPER (Students for Palestinian Equality & Return), a culinary worker speaking about organizing a union at the University of Washington, anti-police brutality activist Castile Hightower and a representative of the International Migrants Alliance. Several speakers denounced the two party system, saying that neither the Democrats nor Republicans are options.

Marchers chanted, “From Palestine to Mexico, border walls have got to go!” A spokesperson for ILPS said, “We are here to show just how connected our struggles are and what we have to do in order to win a new system to win our true liberation.”

U.S. [neo]imperialist hegemony is reliant on an intricate global network of military bases, which are jumping-off points for [neo]imperialist wars and occupations, and as logistics hubs for the entire U.S. military supply chain. Their geographic spread allows for rapid deployments worldwide. This base system continues to expand, as evidenced by the current encirclement of China.

A vital base for U.S. geostrategy is Diego Garcia, the largest island in the Chagos archipelago. Located in the middle of the Indian Ocean, Diego Garcia has housed

B-1 and B-2 bombers and B-52 Stratofortress bombers, which were used in Iraq and Afghanistan during the U.S. wars of aggression. The island was an early testing ground for drone technology.

On world maps the Chagos Islands are named, “British Indian Ocean Territory” (BIOT), giving no indication that Diego Garcia is a U.S. base. The French first colonized the islands governing them as part of Mauritius in the 18th century, bringing enslaved Africans to the Chagos Islands before ceding them to the British in 1814

Shortly before Mauritian independence in 1968, the British split Chagos from Mauritius to maintain its control over the archipelago under the newly created BIOT. (Al Jazeera, Oct. 3)

The proposed temporary truce does not fulfill the main demand, which is to stop the genocide. Hamas has not turned its back on any contacts aimed at finding a solution. Our goal is withdrawal, a fair exchange deal and the return of the displaced. The U.S. side only wants a superficial agreement regarding Gaza. We cannot hand over the occupation’s captives while it continues to kill our people.

We informed the mediators that the proposal presented to us does not meet our demands. “Israeli” massacres are escalating, but the occupation is trying to suppress the media. We believe that the occupation is not ready to conclude an agreement at this time. The resistance is strong and inflicting daily losses on the occupation.

The occupation only wants to retrieve its captives and then resume bombing, which we reject. Negotiations are at a standstill due to the occupation’s unwillingness to conclude an agreement. What is currently being offered is a temporary truce for several days in exchange for a number of the occupation’s captives. The proposed truce has no connection to any serious agreement for a ceasefire.

Israel refuses to comply with international law and U.N. resolutions. We recall here the New York Protocol issued by U.N. Security Council member states on September 25, calling for the implementation of Resolution 1701, a ceasefire, and Israel’s withdrawal from Lebanon, as well as the Security Council’s Resolution 2735, calling for Israel’s withdrawal from Gaza.

In its aggression, Israel commits serious crimes that violate international law, including:

• Crimes of aggression and crimes against peace as defined by art. 6c of the charter of the International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg Charter) and U.N. General Assembly Resolution 3314 , and article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) constituting a violation of the U.N. Charter and a threat to international peace and security.
• Violations of Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC).
• War crimes as described in Article 85 of Protocol I and Article 8 of the Rome Statute, as well as grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions as outlined in Article 85, paragraph 5, and customary rule 156.
• Acts of terrorism, as Israel’s targeting of civilians aims to spread fear, in violation of all international conventions on combating terrorism.
• Genocide under art. 2 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide of 1948 and Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC.
• Crimes against humanity under art. 6c of the charter of the International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg Charter) and Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC, not only against the Lebanese and Palestinian people but against all humanity.

The Lebanese Democratic Lawyers strongly condemn Israel’s crimes and urgently call on the world – governments, international organizations, and human rights bodies – to:

1. Condemn Israel, impose sanctions, boycott it, sever diplomatic relations, and pressure it to stop its aggression and massacres against civilians in line with the Resolution adopted by the U.N. General Assembly at its 10th Emergency Special Session on September 13, 2024, and the Advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the legal consequences arising from Israel’s policies and practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, and from the illegality of Israel’s continued presence in the Occupied Palestinian territories.
2. Work towards expelling Israel from the U.N. and all international and regional organizations, including UNESCO and UNICEF.
3. Cooperating with South Africa, Venezuela, and other countries pursuing legal action against Israel and its officials before the relevant international courts by providing legal assistance and essential documents regarding the crimes committed against Lebanon and its civilian population.
4. Form delegations of lawyers to meet with the judiciary in each country, including bar associations, judges, and law professors, to demand legal condemnation of Israel and legal support for the Lebanese and Palestinian and Syrian people.
5. The Lebanese Democratic Lawyers affirm the right of peoples to self-determination and support the Lebanese and Palestinian resistance against Israeli occupation, racism, and colonialism. They salute the heroic resistance fighters and honor the martyrs who have fallen as a result of Israeli aggression on Palestine, Lebanon, and Syria, with a special tribute to the martyr Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah.

In a related twist last month, Israeli intelligence agencies announced that they had broken up two alleged Iranian spy rings — one of them entirely composed of Israeli Jews.

Yossi Melman, intelligence correspondent for Haaretz, described the very idea that some Israeli Jews are now willing to work for Iran against Israel as a sign of what he described as “the moral decay and disintegration of Israel’s social cohesion.”

Melman reported for the Tel Aviv paper that “the Shin Bet [intelligence agency] and police have arrested 14 Israelis on suspicion of spying for Iran. Since the arrests were made during wartime, the accusations are very severe. The suspects represent two separate rings recruited and controlled by agents of the Iranian ministry of intelligence.”

Despite claiming that the alleged spies were mainly motivated by money, Melman wrote that “the painful truth which cannot be ignored is that more and more Israeli Jews are ready to spy for Iran.”

He claimed that “in the last six months more than 20 Israelis were arrested by the Shin Bet and charged with espionage for Iran’s ministry of intelligence.”

These 20 alleged spies “are Israelis from various walks of life,” Melman claimed.

“Males and females, young and old, from across the country. They represent the mosaic of [their] society: a yeshiva student from Beit Shemesh, a psychology student from a college in Ramat Gan, a businessman from Ashkelon and two new immigrants from Belarus and Ukraine.”

Melman explained the situation as he sees it: “Many Israelis are depressed because they don’t see an end to [Benjamin] Netanyahu’s belligerent policies. The economy is deteriorating and the government doesn’t offer hope to its citizens. All these are fertile ground for the cultivation of spies.”

It also seems to be fertile ground for the possible collapse, or at least severe degradation, of the Israeli military. With no end in sight to the war of attrition being waged by the resistance, the challenges for Israel’s military will only continue to mount.

A collapse may still be a long way off, but for Palestinian and Lebanese people, it could not come soon enough.

Had colonial Britain not worked to plant the zionist project in our land, to build the foundations of a settler state and to seize land, the zionist project would have remained lost in the world, searching for refuge far from us.

British colonialism provided the zionist settler-colonial project with all the elements necessary for its realization: political pledges, land, water, weapons and open doors for the migration of hundreds of thousands of Jewish migrants, while the United States and Western Europe closed their doors to Jewish refugees, pushing them forcibly toward Palestine to contribute to building a Jewish state on our land.

British colonialism did not stop at providing every element for establishing the colonial Jewish state on our land; it also actively suppressed the Palestinian national movement, pursuing its leaders, especially those of the armed resistance, starting with the esteemed Sheikh Izz El-Din Al-Qassam and passing through all the heroes of the resistance. [The British] persisted in tilting the scales in favor of the zionist project, paralyzing the foundation of the Palestinian national project.

British colonialism still exhibits hostility towards our Palestinian people, openly participating in the genocidal war waged by the aggressor state against our people in Gaza, covering Gaza’s skies 24/7 with an aerial surveillance network feeding reports to the occupation army for its mass-killing operations.

It also shows hostility towards the people of Yemen, who have taken on the responsibility of supporting our people in Palestine, by joining naval and air fleets alongside the United States.

It is not enough for Britain to offer an apology for its historical and ongoing crimes against our people. At the very least, alongside an apology, Britain is obligated to cease supplying the occupation state with arms, boycott the economy of its settlements, stop providing cover for the aggressor state in the [United Nations] Security Council or the General Assembly, recognize the State of Palestine, cease obstructing its full membership in the United Nations, continue supporting UNRWA (United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East) and clearly and unequivocally affirm Palestinian refugees’ right of return to their homes and properties from which they were displaced in 1948, in addition to refraining from participating in wars against our Arab peoples.

Despite everything Western colonialism has offered to the zionist project, our people’s resistance has not ceased over the past 100 years and will continue, presenting legendary stories of heroism by our people and their resistance throughout all occupied Palestinian territories.

I would like to take this opportunity to remind everybody that Lord Arthur Balfour was a vile man:

The most important British anti‐Semite of that age, in terms of his eventual services to Zionism, was the fanatical Jew‐baiter Lord Arthur Balfour. In a parliamentary debate on the immigration issue, Balfour made a speech in which he put forward a case for anti‐Semitism that is all too familiar. He declared: “It would not be to the advantage of the civilisation of the country that there should be an immense body of persons who, by their own action, remained a people apart, and not merely held a religion differing from the vast majority of their fellow‐countrymen, but only intermarried among themselves.”⁷

(Source.)