this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
66 points (91.2% liked)

Today I Learned

22015 readers
175 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/64402838

TLDR:

  • Theoretical and experimental evidence now strongly supports the possibility of energy extraction from spinning objects, including black holes.

  • Creating a “black hole bomb” is no longer just science fiction—lab-scale analogs exist.

  • Realizing a full-scale version (especially around a real black hole) is still far in the future, but the groundwork is being laid.

Main Idea

It is theoretically and experimentally possible to extract energy from spinning black holes, and under specific conditions, this could be amplified to create what’s known as a “black hole bomb.”


Theoretical Background

Penrose Process (1969)

  • Proposed by Roger Penrose.

  • Energy can be extracted from a spinning black hole via its ergosphere.

  • The ergosphere is a region just outside the event horizon where spacetime is dragged due to the black hole’s spin.

  • Inside this region:

    • Objects cannot remain stationary.
    • Energy can be gained if mass is ejected in the right way.
    • A spacecraft, for instance, could enter the ergosphere and leave with more energy than it had.

Zeldovich Effect (1971)

  • Proposed by Yakov Zeldovich.
  • Rotating bodies (not just black holes) can amplify electromagnetic waves via rotational energy.
  • Predicted that light or sound aimed at a spinning object could gain energy upon reflection.
  • Required extremely high rotational speeds—nearly relativistic—for noticeable effects.

Experimental Verification

Sound Waves (2020)

  • Spinning absorptive disc increased the energy of low-frequency sound waves.
  • Proved the Zeldovich effect using acoustics.

Electromagnetic Waves (2023–2024)

  • A spinning aluminum cylinder with surrounding magnetic coils showed energy amplification of EM waves.
  • Rotation direction affected energy gain/loss.
  • First real-world proof of the superradiance concept from Zeldovich's theory.

Black Hole Bomb Concept (1972)

Key Mechanism

  • Enclose a spinning black hole (or any rotating energy source) with a reflective mirror.

  • Waves bounce between the mirror and ergosphere, each time gaining energy from the black hole’s spin.

  • This creates a positive feedback loop:

    • Energy builds exponentially.
    • Could result in an enormous explosion (i.e., a “black hole bomb”).
    • Or energy could be released in a controlled burst, like a black hole plasma gun.

Recent Experiments (2024)

  • Miniature black hole bomb analog was created:

    • A metal cylinder was rotated.
    • Surrounded by coils acting as magnetic mirrors.
    • EM waves were amplified exponentially when rotation threshold was met.
    • Verified theoretical predictions experimentally for the first time.

Challenges & Future Research

For Actual Black Holes

  • Creating a real reflective mirror around a black hole is still theoretical.
  • Stabilizing such a structure near a black hole is currently beyond our technology.

Next Step: Quantum Foam

  • Researchers aim to attempt amplification using quantum vacuum energy (quantum foam).

  • If successful:

    • Could demonstrate energy extraction from spacetime itself.
    • Would confirm another Zeldovich prediction.
    • Potential Nobel Prize-level breakthrough.

source

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So this all seems to hinge on the creation of black holes. Last I checked we can't do that, right?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

In familiar three-dimensional gravity, the minimum energy of a microscopic black hole is 1016 TeV (equivalent to 1.6 GJ or 444 kWh), which would have to be condensed into a region on the order of the Planck length. This is far beyond the limits of any current technology. It is estimated that to collide two particles to within a distance of a Planck length with currently achievable magnetic field strengths would require a ring accelerator about 1,000 light years in diameter to keep the particles on track.[citation needed]

From: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro_black_hole

So it's quite unfeasible and energy consuming. To say the least.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Could demonstrate energy extraction from **spacetime itself

Please, don't tell the capitalists.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

How much time would a black hole bomb take to go off?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The thing missing from most of these bullet points is that extracting energy from rotation reduces the speed of the rotating object.

Even black holes are affected by the gravity of objects near them, same as anything else - which means that the black hole will slow down if you slingshot an object around it.

That's why it's called energy extraction rather than energy creation.

So sure, you could make a black hole bomb... but making the black hole in the first place would take as much - if not more - energy than you'll get out of it. And usually you're going to do enough damage just throwing a black hole through your target.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

But a black hole bomb is the only way to be sure

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Whoa! You can get energy from gravity and spin?? Who would have guessed

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

In the lore for the game VALORANT they use these to steal radianite from parallel universes

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago

Oh thank God, a black hole bomb.

I was worried we hit our limit for our potential to completely destroy the planet.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why not simply use an antimatter bomb? Wouldn't that have way more explosive power?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Where are you getting the antimatter from? You need to eat a lot of bananas to get enough for a sizeable explosion.

I honestly think it is more realistic for humanity to use a black hole as energy source than using antimatter.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, and where do you get a black hole that happens to have the appropriate size?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We already know of some. We "just" have to get there.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah sure. We just have to build a spaceship, travel a few thousand lightyears, then accelerate the black hole into the desired direction, probably with an amount if energy that also requires us to build a dyson sphere around the next star. Then wait some ten thousands of years, decelerate it, build the energy harvesting mechanism around it, and boom, enemy obliterated.

I really feel it could be more efficient to just make some antimatter out of pure energy, here on earth, and just mail it to them in a letter bomb.

I mean producing antimatter is ridiculous, too. But so is obtaining a black hole. And I don't get why you wouldn't then directly use it as is, or use the energy you wasted on the project directly. But instead harvest a tiny amount of a black hole's energy to convert specifically that into a weapon... And what kind of application needs "bombs" which are fine to arrive in a few hundred thousands of years or so?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I honestly totally blanked out the "bomb" part in my head. You're right.

It's probably also easier to harness the black hole's energy to produce anti matter and mail it to the aliens than it is to use the hole directly.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Or build a death star. I suppose that skips one conversion step, sucks energy from something and blasts this directly as energy in a death ray. I guess that would do for most cases a bomb works. (And it's kind of similar to the idea here, minus the black hole and spin energy.)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

Some people can get energy from their hole directly.