this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
608 points (99.0% liked)

politics

23557 readers
3335 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's like they can't help being assholes.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Sadly, there isn't a law against it.

Edit: But I'm sure it's one of the very important things that the Democratic Party is totally gonna do someday like they always do whenever they have a majority in congress and/or presidency. Just you wait

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 hours ago

average Texas moment

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 hours ago

You know what isn't protected in the US? Political affiliation.

Start denying MAGA trash employment and service.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago

This man's such a piece of shit even Tyndale didn't want to stick around.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

I know this comment will sound really naive, and it’s not going to make a difference in the grand scheme of things. But, I’m seriously depressed and sad. I was part of the age of Aquarius, and I really did think we were going to make a difference. We tried, but nothing has changed. I just wish we could live in a world of “live and let live”. No violence, no wars, no annexations, no fascists. Kind of like Norway...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I feel exactly the same way as you. I didn't have any plans to leave my country up until a year or two ago. While I'm glad I did leave, I'm also so extremely angry and upset at the failure of a country that caused me to leave. It also makes me sick to my stomach to think about what's going to happen to the people I love

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Have you ever seen a chicken hatch? It's a messy and destructive process. Before that first peck, the chick inside the egg is all but invulnerable. As soon as it makes that first crack though, all bets are off. The shell can cut the chick killing it, it can drown in the remaining embryonic fluid in the egg if it can't get out in time, and it is immediately set upon by hordes of bacteria and viruses that couldn't get to it. However, as long as everything goes somewhat normally, 5 minutes late you have a cute fluffy chick.

Humanity takes a bit longer to develop societally because so many bad habits have inertia. Your generation kept the ball rolling, and specifically set up the necessary destruction needed to get society to the point that you were at 55 years ago. The process started in the mid 1800s, and should finish, in the next couple to few decades, with either all of us dead, or whoever's left uniting under a single banner of equality and prosperity for all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

History. It’s a messy and destructive process. Let me dilute this: Unfortunately, we haven’t learned from WWI, or WWII. Our grandfathers fought and died against fascism, and Hitler. And here we are—again. AGAIN. There are children starving, dying, and suffering in Gaza. We have lost our humanity.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Take care of yourself. None of this is normal and thus you're going to need more self care than normal. You are making a difference even just sharing the way this makes you feel. We're all in this together and I can see you know that too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Actually, I really don’t care about your religion or politics. I DO care that children are dying. I DO care that children are suffering and going hungry.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago

It happens. Not a big deal and frankly those are important things that we should all care about so I can't say I disagree.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 13 hours ago

Page 21 of the ruling:

First, the Enforcement Guidance contravenes Title VII's plain text by expanding the scope of "sex" beyond the biological binary: male and female. Although Title VII defines "sex" to also include "pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions," §2000e(k), the Enforcement Guidance concludes that "sex" under Title VII "includes 'pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions' and sexual orientation and gender identity." Enforcement Guidance, §I(A)(5) (emphasis added). Notably, the Guidance uses quotation marks around "pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions"—but not "sexual orientation" or "gender identity." Because neither the plain text of Title VII nor Supreme Court precedent defines Title VII "sex" this broadly. Thus, the Enforcement Guidance lacks statutory or jurisprudential authority to expand Title VII's definition of "sex" to include these new categories.

Interestingly, this also seems to provide a legal basis to discriminate against straight people and cis people. It'll be interesting to see how Republicans attempt to close that extra loophole without also closing the loophole for discrimination against LGBTQ people.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Relax. Its not great but this is one of those judges the government always puts there shit in front of. We should do work to get him removed but this will hopefully be brought down in the courts which so far haven't been totally useless

[–] [email protected] 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It's amazing how just a few months ago the people's option on the courts was at an all-time low. Now because President Trump has caused so much chaos they're more popular than ever.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago

It's the difference between getting stabbed and getting your arm degloved. Sure getting stabbed sucks but getting your arm degloved is far far worse.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 19 hours ago

Time to break out the combat boots.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 22 hours ago

Texas can't secede fast enough, maybe we can get a twofer with florida

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How long until straight men will be fired, or at least yelled at, for supposedly being gay for not risking their lives at work?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 18 hours ago

My work photo is my brother-in-law and I posing in tuxes at his and my sister's wedding

Objectively, I look super gay in the photo

I haven't changed it because I'm waiting for the homophobe to yell at the straight guy for his gay-looking photo

[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago

Oh I'm sure it'll be soon. That's an excellent cover to essentially abuse workers.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The same for fascists and nazis then too, right?

OoOooOO!! Someone likes a STWONG MAN :3 UwU You gonna suck Trump's dick? That's very LGBTQ+ of you...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Discriminating based on political ideology was always allowed.

It just doesn't matter and isn't a good rebuttal because the fascists and Nazis are the ones with the power, so discrimination against them doesn't hurt them the way their discrimination hurts others.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Many states never agreed with LGBT people having employment at all. Much of the history involves homelessness as a result of not being able to have sustained work because in many states, society would label and sabotage the ability for LGBT or people believed to be LGBT to have employment which is necessary to maintain housing. It was very much a sustained, methodical, approach that was taken. This is true going back to the Lavendar Scare in the Federal Govt, where like rooting out communists during the McCarthy era, they made sure to take all the Govt jobs away from anyone believed to be gay. Discrimination at work is a key means of taking away the right for someone to work.

Now they have many new weapons to enforce this end result in the lives of people living in the states that want to bring this back.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

The hypocritical Republican activist judge of course.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago

How Christian of them.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Oh hey, it's this asshole. This guy is the reason I reacted to that news about making all court rulings only apply locally with some humorous positivity. (also because humor helps me cope with general awfulness)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

No, they absolutely can help being assholes. But for them it's not enough to win, those they see as "losers" must suffer.

load more comments
view more: next ›