All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.
Rules (Click to Expand):
Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about
Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.
No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.
Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.
Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).
If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.
Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:
Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0
Why does the lock, faucet and shades run on batteries to begin with? They aren't portable devices, just spend a few minutes running a damn cable and you never have to care about power ever again.
The coolest thing about this IR laser is the very cyberpunk things a hacker might do with it.
Smart lock sounds insecure on multiple levels.
Lock Picking Lawyer has entered the chat
“Today I’ll be looking at this smart lock which is powered by a laser. All I’ll do is put a cover over it and wait…
And there we go.”
Seriously though, look up any “smart” lock on his channel. It’s hilarious how bad they all are.
They all have a backup method of opening, every time it's a cheap lock that is easy to open. It's obvious that all the companies are only interested in their digital idea, and not actual security.
It costs $1250 for something with terrible efficiency. You could buy an awful lot of batteries for that much money.
Last time I read about this about 2/3 of the energy of the laser disappeared during the conversion to electricity. Has that improved?
Mor says Wi-Charge’s wireless power transfer efficiency is about 15 percent compared to a direct wired connection.
That’s not counting the energy used to power the transmitter’s Wi-Fi connection, status LEDs, and so forth.