this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
243 points (95.8% liked)

World News

46721 readers
2681 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Denmark is reconsidering its 40-year ban on nuclear power in a major policy shift for the renewables-heavy country.

The Danish government will analyse the potential benefits of a new generation of nuclear power technologies after banning traditional nuclear reactors in 1985, its energy minister said.

The Scandinavian country is one of Europe’s most renewables-rich energy markets and home to Ørsted, the world’s biggest offshore wind company. More than 80% of its electricity is generated from renewables, including wind, biofuels and solar, according to the International Energy Agency.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Nuclear power is the only way for humanity to progress.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yet another article that tries to create the impression that there might perhaps possibly be theoretical considerations for the return to the use of nuclear power under certain circumstances...

It's unlikely.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How a nation can defend one's nuclear reactors against sabotage and assault considering we have a war boiling in Europe?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Is it different than how a country would protect other infrastructure like government buildings, hospitals, other electrical grid infrastructure, dams, etc.?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

If for no other reason than defense, it should be considered. Europe can't rely on the US nuclear umbrella anymore, unfortunately. Y'all need a local source for weapons.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I wonder how much wind, solar and energy storage you could build with all that money

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

It's not either-or. Money that aren't spend on nuclear will be mostly spent on burning fossil fuels, because that's the niche they occupy together.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcoN2bdACGA Please watch this. This is Why Trump is threatening Greenland. This Technology would be the END of for profit energy production. That's where all the far-right bullshit has come from, that's why Jordan Peterson and Joe Rogan are all pushing climate denial. War is the only way fossi fuels remain in demand because there are no electric tanks!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Money isn't the issue.

Nimby'ism is preventing the expansion of solar and wind. Nimby'ism will also prevent the building of a large nuclear plant.

I hope the change of law will enable more research on modern nuclear power.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's not NIMBY's it's oil. Look at The Simpsons, who's the evil billionaire polluting the planet? Mr. Burns. The Simpsons airs on FOX, once you see it, you can't unsee it. Even though nuclear power has killed less people than every other form of energy production. They've been trying to repressing and demonising this technology for the last 70 years. Coal Fire power plants release more radiation into the atmosphere in a single Day then a nuclear reactor will in its entire existence. Coal Fire power plants kill 1,000,000 people a year. We've had this technology for 70 years that's 70 million people that's more people than dies in World War II and we're not allowed to even talk about it. Traditional lightwater reactors where enriched uranium rods are water cooled were designed for nuclear submarines. They were never supposed to upscaled to this degree. But the US cut funding to the Oakridge nuclear project because of pressure from the fossil fuel industry. This subliminal messaging, showing nuclear waste as glowing green goo is in everything. Video games, comic books, movies, it's everywhere. They don't want the public to be aware of the safety and energy benefits. These new Thorium salt reactors produce less than 1/1000 the waste of lightwater reactors and they can even burn waste rods from traditional lightwater reactors. That's what the far-right is for to suppress the green revolution because that would mean the end of fossil fuels grip over the destiny of our planet. These people know global warming is real, fuck, trump just built seawalls around his golf course. This is why he's threatening Greenland because war would mobilise NATO troops, removing support from Ukraine and give them an excuse to bomb the fuck out of Copenhagen to ensure the company working to produce finish their first prototype reactor would disappear. This is why Rogan and Jordan Peterson and all those dickheads support war and push climate denial.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Sure thing. This post is about Denmark though, where the nuclear power has been banned by hippies in the 80s, and the same old idiots now decline expanding solar power because they prefer to look at fields of manure instead of solar panels.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

how is that nasty mink farming going then? denmark has changed to the worse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Didn't all the mink farms close?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

https://www.europeancorrespondent.com/r/the-sad-return-of-the-minks

denmark is on a decline. visit any town but CPH and you see a dying country. small towns are super backwards, integration kinda failed (dont mention iranians), drinking prime minister....and mink farms.

denmark was cool like 40yrs back or so

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Interesting perspective. When you say any town, do you include places like Aarhus and Odense? If yes, what are the symptoms of the country dying there?

What small towns are you talking about specifically? There are definitely struggling places out there, in curious if we're thinking of the same places.

Also what's the issue with the prime minister drinking?

What was cool about Denmark 40 years ago?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

well if i go to the north sea any city is in decline. blavand,rodekro all those...and then go up to hjorring...i stayed there a week some years back...aaaauuuugh...the horrors.

went to the mall in aarhus...made me laugh and cry..they still to this day have a "how i met your mother" cafe in the mall...since 20 years...and it looks like it. but it is not only the ugly malls outside of cph it is that the cities have just become useless. i hang out in hvarde often and nothing absolutely nothing has improved there in the last 2 decades. necropole? is that what you call communities of old ppl? while decades ago denmark could have been considered progessive I am sure you wont find anyone outside of denmark say that.

have they stopped farming wild animals? no. has their policy on drungs evolved? nope.

maybe it is their brainrot, but thoses fences for the swineflu...absurd. just go say you hate brown people.

so 40yrs ago DK was cool because they were at least progressive,quite rich and laid back.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

They closed down all, about 1400 small farms, in 2020.

The ban was removed in 2023. 6 larger farms have reopened since then, comparable to 15 of the previous farms.

It was a total shit show, but at least the clean up forced all the skeletons out of the closet.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So, could we in Sweden perhaps then reopen the nuclear power plant of Barsebäck, that was closed because Denmark didn't enjoy having one right across the water from their capital?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Med plutonium tvingar vi danskarna på knä!

https://youtu.be/YlTukY9fV9Y

load more comments
view more: next ›