this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
684 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

70266 readers
3937 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

It’s BS they didn’t know about it. They got the financials before the deal. Even if it wasn’t directly listed as a line item it would have been a part of the expenses.

They still thought the deal was worth doing as it was based on incoming revenue and outgoing expenses.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Why would anyone be stupid enough to not honor them? Now, even if they backtrack, their name is mud. It's so stupid.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Damn straight. I never heard of this company before but you can bet your life I will never do business with them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Is this even legal? I mean people paid for the lifetime version.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (4 children)

If the new owners purchased the assets, name, and technology and not the company itself, then it's beholden on the remains of the old company to honour the deal... Good luck with that.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How many people start companies, rack up a bunch of debt, then create another company that buys everything except the debt?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They should be refunded tbh.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's probably some fine print in the ToS that says they can do this. It may or may not be legal but that makes it a lengthier court battle to try to prove.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

There are so many ways they can put the squeeze on. Session time limit, throttle fraffic, restrict usage times etc.

Then you can sell a monthly VPN+ subscription and offer revisiting lifetime users 2 years free if they move to the new “better” service.

I’m not saying I agree with any of this, but it’s certainly not a new strategy. They’ve nothing to lose. Those who are pissed off will leave, you already have their money and those who want to stay will pay up.

The VPN company can have their cake and eat it

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is going to be Plex Pass in a few years if Plex sells out even more

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

I’ve had a lifetime Plex pass for many years. I have converted completely over to Jellyfin after trying it.

It’s more involved to set up for secure remote access, but once in place it is so much smoother to use.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

This is why the first question is, is it open source?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is also why I stopped prepaying for things. Sure I’m spending $50 more a year but at least I have flexibility.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Agency... people need to be more mindful when they are giving it up. It leads to bad places unless you know what you are doing.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›