this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
1306 points (97.7% liked)

News

29387 readers
3575 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Republicans are drunk with power. What a stupid fucking idea. There’s no chance of banning porn. Then they wouldn’t be able to jerk to Trans women and feel shame after.

Trans women are hot, in case that reads as though the shame is correct. It’s not.

(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

I wonder how Kanye feels about his homies trying to take away his favourite internet activity.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

To those weebs, who voted Trump, because "the transes" were mean to you for the loli hentai: this is on you!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Accountwalled

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Listen here, William… I know you’re new around here…

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

(. Y .) FUCK MIKE LEE

[–] [email protected] 56 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I. Dare. You.

If they want a "civil war" this is the way to get one, lol

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It might actually be their intention, keep pushing until you get unrests and then they can declare martial law and kill anyone they deem left or woke

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Thank god, I can still jerk it to women's feet.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Everyone except for the trump family of pornographers.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Oh no. If this happens Canada could lose its "shut pornhub down" card. How dare the US take that gun and willingly shoot itself in the foot?

What's next, they'll start taxing themselves on Europe's use of their digital goods and send the money to Europe before they can impose the taxes on their consumers? 47D chess moves here.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 62 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Under the bill, content would be considered obscene if it appeals to prurient interests in nudity

And since they've already taken away due process, they're basically paving the way to send anyone who has a body they don't like to a death camp. I don't think it's hyperbole anymore to say that that US is fucked.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Eh. This isn’t new. It’s one dipshit senator and one dipshit representative.

People have been trying to get porn banned in the US for as long as there’s been porn.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I would not take this lightly, you are not wrong about it going nowhere. For now. All they have to do is convince their voters that porn is woke.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

For no reason whatsoever, I know there is a subset of adult artistic moving picture genres devoted to fully clothed activities.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My browser history alone would get me the chair

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago (6 children)

If it'll get you the chair now, I'm worried what it would get you after the bill is passed.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh shit... watch out for J.D.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

He will Pope your ass.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh, so a news report about him getting caught with some sort of embarrassing porn is about to come out. Got it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

Removing porn is also one of goals of project 2025 so double whammy

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

This is about getting people breed more. Honestly, I see this motive in all of their policies. The real reason republican politicians hate people who fall into the LGBTQ spectrum is because they can't produce new children and even when they can they're probably much less likely to. They want to get rid of porn, contraceptives, women's rights, and alternative lifestyles and at the same time try to entice people to have kids. If you want to fight against their agenda then don't have kids.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Unfortunately those that believe in their ideology will keep having kids. As an anecdote, my Trump loving cousins have a total of 18 kids compared to the total of 2 for those that aren't. Most of those kids will go on to follow their parents political and ideological beliefs.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (3 children)

This is truly the issue. Uneducated extremists are and will by far outbreed ideologically sane people who tend to doubt society, our existence, and bringing children into the world. Personally I don't believe in the future so I don't see a point in ruining my life with a child's weeping and cleaning poop just for it to grow up and have to be part of this circus of the maniacs.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How they liking those medicare cuts coming up?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

A bit of polio will take care of that problem.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›