this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
22 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9641 readers
676 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

This is actually really interesting.

So like, on the one hand, this sucks because in catering to the separatist movement, she moves the Overton window further to the right, but on the other hand, Smith's main goal is for Alberta to follow Conservative values, but not so far as others in the UCP and their supporters.

Strategically, in terms of her end goals, this move she's made makes sense. The UCP is quite literally the United Conservative Party, brought together by a merger of the Progressive Conservatives and Wildrose after they and right-wing policies lost the election to what was for the most part, a united left-wing with the NDP if you ignore the Alberta Liberals.

Now when the NDP won in Alberta under Notley, right-wing parties actually gained a higher percentage of the vote, just they were split between the Wildrose headed by Brian Jean, and the Progressive Conservatives, who at that point had several years of controversy between Jim Prentice and Allison Redford. Danielle Smith, as the former leader for the Wildrose who ran against Redford's Progressive Conservatives in 2012, is seeing a risk factor for a "united right" to fall apart, potentially handing over another win to left-wing politics in the province, which she likely sees as a greater threat since the possibility of an NDP government is statistically higher than Alberta leaving Canada.

No matter what she loses here, either she risks a party split leading to a split right-wing vote in the upcoming election and possibly handing her political opponents a win, or she loses more centre-right votes to the NDP (who are arguably moving more to the centre) by appealing to the fringes of the party with a referendum.

I hate to say it since I'm no Conservative, but frankly this could all be avoided if the province instills proportional representation in it's elections. As much as I love the NDP, we quite literally should have never had them in power like we did as they won a minority 40% of the vote.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

"Just let me pander to these fringe extremists so they stop wanting to leave my party"

Better idea. Don't do that. Tell the fringe extremists to kick bricks, set the UCP on fire, and let the rest of us have 4 years of actual prosperity under the NDP.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

That'd be nice, except that the fringe extremists ARE the party.

This is really to justify to the 'moderate' conservatives why she's pandering to the extremists, and isn't one herself. (Which is a lie.)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago

I think the right needs another voice haha

[–] [email protected] 11 points 22 hours ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Well you see, she doesn't support sovereignty, and has to stop them from starting their own party, so obviously she has to give them what they want, stoke the flames, and make it easier to hold a referendum.

It's so simple!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

May this strategy work out as well for her as it did for David Cameron in the UK.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 21 hours ago

Moderate conservatives and far-right secessionist conservatives don't agree on secession, but if she doesn't do what the far-right conservatives want, she might lose political power, so she's happy to support the people threatening to tear the country apart because it serves her personal interests.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

Idk, she doesn't either. It's what her foreign handlers tell her to say.