this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
1063 points (98.5% liked)

politics

23672 readers
2727 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 58 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I cannot be the only one here who sees tiny hands.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

[narrator]: bill gates did not GET ReST.

[–] [email protected] 75 points 3 weeks ago (15 children)

I got downvoted on Lemmy the other day because I said that I prefer Bill Gates to Musk.

Maybe there are things about Gates I don't know. Maybe he is actually quite an evil person; I don't know. But he does at least spend billions of dollars helping vulnerable people, right? And Bill's stances on global politics are far more sensible than those of Musk.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

There are no good billionaires. But I must agree that Bill Gates cannot be compared to Elon Musk. Bill has done evil, but his evil doesn't compare to what Elon Musk is doing right now

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

Yep well said

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (8 children)

The massive cock slobbering that Warren Buffet got at his Woodstock of Capitalism last week was nauseating. All the media were fawning over how he’s still a small-town Nebraska bumpkin. I have to hand it to him he crafted his image perfectly as a “good billionaire” too.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Nuance is lost on a lot of people on here. All billionaires bad therefore no billionaire is preferred. While I agree there's no good billionaire there's a spectrum of bad. Like would I rather break my pelvis or break my legs? Both are bad but one is preferable.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Didn't some nations in Africa ask Gates to stop helping?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

I will wager that some people from some nations asked him to stop helping based solely on the fact that we can't get millions of people to reliably agree on anything.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean Gates donated his own money to help the poorest people in the world. Elon spent his money to become president so he could steal money from the poor at people in the world.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Gates donated his money to avoid taxes and start a big pharma company.

Also Bill Gates comment is about USAID an imperialistic tool which has killed many millions of children. The irony of this statement is palpable.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

so this is what he meant by eliminated world hunger, by killing them directly or indirectly.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

The only way to get rid of poverty is to get rid of the poor.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's logical: no people -> no hunger.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

and that's how you know it didn't even occur to him. he just did it for the sake of cruelty.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›