this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
272 points (85.1% liked)

Funny

9529 readers
1646 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
272
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
(page 2) 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago (8 children)

Without context this isn't funny and the most i can get out of it is that it is fat shaming and/or shaming unshaved legs

[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (8 children)

I don't like the idea of the word fat-shaming. Of course I don't condone bullying but being so hyper protective about someone being fat just is peculiar to me. When I was fat myself, due to the teasing of my friends (again not bullying) I put in the work and got fit therefore now I'm more healthy. That wouldn't happen if my friends were afraid of not "fat-shaming" me

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

It's natural human interaction, issues arise when either side is intolerant to hearing the others perspective.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I mean, that's nice for you, but the difference is that that teasing was coming from the friends, and not internet randos who neither know nor care about you.

Next to nobody who sees that screenshot knows the person in the photo, or whether they're even able to lose weight by "putting in the work".

Also, there's a preponderance of evidence that your case is an outlier, and "teasing" does not improve the lives of its targets.

You never know what somebody is going through, and it costs nothing to be kind.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Putting in the work is mostly eating normal portions, and not only grease USA™.

That person is fat, it's not normal and it has nothing to do with being kind.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (5 children)

I'm not gonna engage with you beyond this since you're obviously uninterested in opinions other than your own, otherwise you might have looked at any of the studies I linked investigating weight-related stigma, which is related to others' kindness or lack thereof.

You're not fighting societal acceptance of obesity, you're just lazily perpetuating harmful social stigmas to justify your own discomfort with fat people.

You say it's not "normal" to be fat, but if a condition is considered epidemic, it's not really abnormal anymore, is it.

You don't know what that person eats. You don't know if that person has a medical disorder. You don't know if that person is disabled and unable to prepare healthy food for themselves. You don't know if that person has an eating disorder that they can't afford treatment for. You don't know if that person is on medications that affect their weight. You don't know if that's even a real person or an AI-generated image.

But you're real quick to diagnose the cause of their obesity as exclusively their personal failure for not eating the correct amount of the correct food.

It takes minutes to see what researchers are saying about this stuff.

Historically, the central dogma of the science of obesity has been that it is simply an energy balance disorder: calories in, calories out. If this energy-based model (EBM) of obesity, was true, then essentially exercising more and eating less should work for everyone. However, this is not the case. Many researchers believe that the pathophysiology of obesity is more complex.

While both social–environmental factors and genetic preposition have been recognized to play important roles in obesity epidemic, Gao et al. (2021) present evidence showing that epigenetic changes may be a key factor to explain interindividual differences in obesity.

Honestly there have been a few times recently where I've seen fat people doing or saying interesting things online, and half the fucking comments are vitriol about their weight and how it reflects on their character, as though that overshadows and invalidates anything they're doing. And sometimes I see other commenters challenging these views, and sometimes the hate commenters will backpedal of they realize that the person they're discussing has what the consider to be a valid medical excuse.

I'm autistic and ADHD, and to me, that kind of behaviour is a reflection of what goes on in places like fakedisordercringe, where they claim to respect people with official diagnoses but never bother to actually see which of their targets has an official diagnosis, or consider that the absence of a formal diagnosis doesn't mean the absence of the condition. And that's because it's not actually about the underlying reasons for the behavior they're mocking, because they don't care about those reasons. They'd rather not know if there's a diagnosis that would exclude their target from mockery because how their target is acting makes them uncomfortable.

It's a way of enforcing conformity through cruelty, just like bullying fat people.

And I've read stuff like this piece, with the line "I wish I didn’t have to justify myself, or base my worth on proving that I’m trying.", and I see myself in that. I've burned myself out multiple times and seriously damaged my physical and mental health as a result of trying to act like I'm neurotypical.

I'm fucking tired of seeing anybody get judged as moral deficients online by people who know nothing about them or their histories.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Huh, the meta-analysis you linked doesn't really align with your point though (excerpt from the conclusion, emphasis is mine):


Key practice implications

The causes of obesity are manifold and cannot be attributed to one single cause, such as overeating.

In most cases, including polygenic obesity, the factors causing obesity are modifiable.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 days ago

Yeah but, despite all of that, (none of which I read, I'm sure it's all true though), it is a natural law of the universe that you cannot get more energy out of a system than you put in. Regardless of all other factors, if you consume upto your daily maintenance calorific intake, you cannot gain weight. If you consume less, you WILL lose weight. Whether external factors or pressures prevent you from managing your calorific intake correctly in another discussion, but the laws of thermodynamics don't take a break when it comes to health and nutrition.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The irony being that despite the ironclad argument you wrote, they'll still irrationally judge fat people for their weight.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 4 days ago (7 children)

It’s iron clad in the literal sense that cladding something clad with iron still is heavily susceptible to corrosion.

At the end of the day being fat is a choice, you can have a metabolic disorder that causes you to gain weight if you eat 1/8th the calories of the average person but you are still choosing to eat more than you need. You can have abnormal signaling pathways that make you feel hungry or even lightheaded that causes you to overeat but again you are choosing to give in to a feeling that you know is bad for you. You can be disabled/poor and struggle to prepare food so you only eat cheap unhealthy food but you are still choosing to eat more of it than you need. Making fun of people for being fat might not help them lose weight but it’s not like you are making fun of a person because of something they can’t change like their race, sexual orientation, or even height, it is something that they can 100% change and the picture isn’t of someone whose 10-20 pounds overweight but instead well over 100lbs more than they should be.

It might be an unpopular opinion but a person should feel bad when they are that glutinous that they have consumed 500k calories above their required weight

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 5 days ago

You're right, I should try and be more kind. Sorry

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 63 points 5 days ago

I think the implication is OP got catfished

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

Very simple. Turns out the egirlfriens op has a crush on is not attractive at all to op meaning its over.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 5 days ago
[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Can't rule out that's a close-up of a capybara. Gf is 3 capybaras stacked in a trenchcoat? Rule 1 of the Internet--pics or she never happened.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Which number is “there are no girls on the internet?”

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

I heard this one as, "everyone is a cat".

Quick search says Internet Rule 29 0r 30, "the men are nen, the women are men, or cats, or undercover cops".

Also, "...almost none of the numbers are standardized".

[–] [email protected] 122 points 5 days ago (1 children)

"I'm serious. She could actually be a 300 pound dude who lives in his momma's basement in suburban Detroit. And her name is Chuck." - Ready Player One

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

No, no, no! Come on! Cooper was right... This guy wants to have sex with me!

"Listen, Mieke... I don't want to arrange any meetings with you, you sick, German freak. So please keep your hands off my genitals, and never write to me again, and don't come to America. Goodbye."

  • EuroTrip
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't get it

Isn't it pretty normal not to shave your legs?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I think the implication is that the discord girlfriend was an overweight man pretending to be a woman in order to catfish

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 79 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Is the problem that she uses Gnome, or that she uses dark mode?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 5 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 days ago

Doesn't look like gnome in any way. That task bar looks like windows 11. Gnome doesn't have a task bar. The "bar" of icons on the left are discord servers.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago

Those are the 2 best things in this image

[–] [email protected] 59 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't that look more like Windows 11?

[–] [email protected] 40 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Windows 11 did rip off gnome 🤔

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Maybe she's just cheating and accidently sent you a private pic from the person she's cheating with, don't give up hope /s

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago

You vs the guy she tells you not to worry about

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›