this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1873 readers
38 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A report by IBM explains part of the hype around GenAI:

25% of AI initiatives have delivered expected ROI over the last few years

52% of CEOs say their organization is realizing value from generative AI investments beyond cost reduction

For 64% of CEOs the risk of falling behind drives investment in some technologies before they have a clear understanding of the value they bring, but only 37% prefer to be “fast and wrong” than “right and slow”

https://newsroom.ibm.com/2025-05-06-ibm-study-ceos-double-down-on-ai-while-navigating-enterprise-hurdles
@techtakes

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

25% of AI initiatives have delivered expected ROI over the last few years

And LLMs are basically free now... I wonder how this will look when OpenAi starts rising the subscription costs.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

That's exactly what I'm expecting any time now.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That tracks. CEOs are locked in a state of needing to justify their own existence. Being the one in charge of migrating to AI is the perfect reason. CEOs live and die by quarterly performance, but don’t have to answer to long term issues; janky code that resembles a demo is good enough to last until the CEO can laterally jump to the next ship.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

@swlabr heh, that's a bit too much of generalisation for my personal taste. How many CEOs did you speak to in the last 5 years to make you so confident about their "state"?

Here's one about "jumping ships":
"world’s best-performing CEOs demonstrate remarkable longevity. They’ve held their jobs for an average of 15 years, more than twice the average tenure of an S&P 500 CEO"
https://hbr.org/2019/11/the-truth-about-ceo-tenure

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

I've been giving professional advice about system administration directly to CEOs and CTOs of startups for over half a decade. They've all asked about AI one way or another. While some of my previous employers have had good reasons to use machine learning, none of the businesses I've worked with in the past half-decade have had any use for generative AI products, including startups whose entire existence was predicated on generative AI.

Don't sign up for a dick-measuring contest without measuring yourself first.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How many CEOs did you speak to in the last 5 years to make you so confident about their “state”

Probably just short of 70, definitely more than 68.

Here’s one about “jumping ships”

  1. That “article” doesn’t say shit about fuck.
  2. Your point in no way conflicts with what I said.
  3. What are you even doing here? How does boot taste?
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

@swlabr
What's with this fascist language:
"What are you even doing here? How does boot taste?"
I'm gonna leave you to your own hate.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

The poster has been assigned the complete works of Umberto Eco and escorted to the egress.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

I don’t hate you for bootlicking, I just pity you.