I don't have to measure it. I stick under glass and define it as the standard which all other measurements are derived from.

Now the engineers and/or scientists are crying

https://youtu.be/VYQVlVoWoPY

Because you never make a circle. You just make a polygon with a perimeter of four and an infinite number of sides as the number of sides approaches infinity.

I think it's because no matter how many corners you cut it's still an approximation of the circumference. There's just an infinite amount of corners that sticks out

It's a fractal problem, even if you repeat the cutting until infinite, there are still a roughness with little triangles which you must add to Pi, there are no difference between image 4 and 5, the triangles are still there, smaller but more. But it's a nice illusion.

They're there to askew why the logic doesn't work.

Try it when you find some physicist that cares about exact values. Or when you see pigs flying over your head, both are about as likely.

Yup, similar to the square root of two and Euler's number.

These are numbers defined by their properties and not their exact values. In fact, we have imaginary numbers that don't have values and yet are still extremely useful because of their defined properties.

1?