this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
474 points (98.6% liked)

News

29454 readers
3123 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

White House proposes giving out $5,000 checks to address falling birthrates amid growing ‘pronatalist’ movement

One of Donald Trump’s priorities for his second term is getting Americans to have more babies – and the White House has a new proposal to encourage them to do so: a $5,000 “baby bonus”.

The plan to give cash payments to mothers after delivery shows the growing influence of the “pronatalist” movement in the US, which, citing falling US birthrates, calls for “traditional” family values and for women – particularly white women – to have more children.

But experts say $5,000 checks won’t lead to a baby boom. Between unaffordable health care, soaring housing costs, inaccessible childcare and a lack of federal parental leave mandates, Americans face a swath of expensive hurdles that disincentivize them from having large families – or families at all – and that will require a much larger government investment to overcome.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

It's a way of funneling money to the fundies and ultra-reactionary Catholics.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I bet it will have the opposite effect.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

The fact that formula is now pretty universally behind the counter or behind a locked cabinet door says a lot about the current situation in America.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

He "could" TOTALLY pay his way into a baby boom.

Step 1: Tax the rich. Lower the pressure on the lower and middle classes.

Step 2: Fix housing pricing so that a single hard-working person can afford a house, a car, and two kids without their partner having to work.

Step 3: Put some guardrails in place to stop the 2-3 companies that are buying up everything. Give medium and small business a chance to thrive without needing to be purchased by a giant company.

Step 4. Fix healthcare so that the family above gets 100% coverage for whatever happens. Pay for it with Step 1.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Wow, look at that! The price of strollers just went up 5k!

Replace strollers with basically anything related to birth or infants. 5k more to spend? 5k more to earn by big business selling wares.

This assumes the hospital doesn't determine that you seem to owe 5k more for that one out of network service provider they slipped in while you were distracted during birthing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hate our healthcare system so much. Individual bills for random doctors you never asked for that are somehow working for the hospital but are unrelated in terms of their insurance policy makes zero sense. How could anyone consent to anything in a reasonable fashion

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Preach. I can do nothing but agree, and I have insider info in the insurance industry, pharma and healthcare. It's all a game to make the rich even richer and the politicians are colluding in such a bipartisan fashion you'd think the parties were fully unified.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If $5000 is a lot to you, he's really not interested in there being more of "your type" of person.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Actually, I'm sure he's quite interested in there being a nice big class of desperate labor pool ripe for exploitation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Well, they say societies grow great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they will never sit in.

Trump doesn't seem like a man who thinks that far ahead. He's more the Fox News "great replacement" type.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

To quote George Carlin, 'living babies make dead soldiers'.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

If hes following the century initiative he will cap money supply growth at 3% or so, which will drastically bring down home prices.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Just birthing the damn thing is like $50,000. He can shove the $5,000 right up his ass and I hope he gets paper cuts up there too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I believe $5k is around the average cost (after insurance) to have a baby in the US if you have insurance.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Remove insurance. I know I was exaggerating but the bottom line is the poor are hit most and there's a higher chance they don't have insurance. Especially if Medicaid gets gutted.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

It’ll join the light bulbs up there from the 1st term

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

We don't even have to ask the experts. Just look at Japan that tried something similar in the past. Of course it was a complete failure... This is basic reality, right? Families that don't have money simply can't afford to raise a child even if they get a bit of cash at the start. Pay them more than a living wage if you want them to have kids.

load more comments
view more: next ›