this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
64 points (81.4% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

1731 readers
196 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!


Meanwhile On Grad


Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!


What is a Tankie?


Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.

Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.

Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post as opposed to arguing.

You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Libs only vote and think that's enough! You're required to murder people to join the club!"

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

"you can't vote fascists out of office

votes Fascists out of office

"Well uh still not good enough!"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

He is making good relations with Russia. That's probably why

[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Germany is closer than ever to a second fascist takeover, with the ruling CDU actively trying to normalize the AfD, and the latter now leading the polls, by far the highest they've ever been. They've also doubled their vote in the last election. So yes, antifascists did not win here

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

Crazy that the original post said nothing about what antifascists do or don't do but people insist on projecting.

"Fascists aren't gaining power. Antifascists are making a comeback"

The first sentence is necessary (but not sufficient) for beating fascism; the second is a statement of momentum.

Antifascism has existed as long as fascism, well before any guns were fired or wars were fought. It encompasses many different approaches to opposing fascism and isn't even strictly a left-wing position (revolutionary vs counter revolutionary).

If you think the only viable playbook to beat fascism is revolutionary accelerationism, that's a logical stance to take. But it makes no sense to be upset when other people use the term differently.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah remember when we all banded together and peacefully voted hitler and mussolini out?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago (3 children)

If Hitler hadn't been in office, do you imagine nothing would be different? Like they'd pluck that rabble-rousing failed artist off the street when Hindenburg died?

If Hillary had won, The Idiot would just be some fuckin' guy. The same loudmouthed punchline he'd always been. The election was the only thing that gave him power - so not electing him would have stopped his atrocities.

When Biden was in, The Idiot was right back to being some fuckin' guy. He got arrested. He was being federally prosecuted. He was facing unpardonable state charges. The election was the only thing keeping his fat ass out of jail.

If Harris had won, The Idiot would still be some fuckin' guy. He couldn't disappear people to foreign countries, from his couch.

Elections matter. Elections work. Elections are step one. If you just don't put fascists in power, fascists tend not to have power. If you're dumb enough to do it anyway - we did in fact peacefully vote out The Idiot. Remember? Biden won. By the skin of his teeth, thanks to our batshit stupid electoral system. Despite every effort to prevent, lie about, and then ignore the results. American democracy was strong enough that this liberal-bashing jibe actually happened - once.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

When Biden was in, The Idiot was right back to being some fuckin’ guy. He got arrested. He was being federally prosecuted. He was facing unpardonable state charges. The election was the only thing keeping his fat ass out of jail.

Right, because everyone knows that Hitler never would have been Chancellor if he had been arrested and thrown in jail for treason after attempting a coup d'état

Jesus Christ, for as often as libs compare Trump to Hitler i'm actually shocked at how little they actually know about that similarity.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Imagine if Trump had actually been sent to prison and had time and opportunity to write his own Mein Kampf.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Hitler never got directly voted in by an election. Please go read history again.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Germans voted the NSDAP into power. You're kinda splitting hairs here

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

I don't even know what point you're trying to make, Hitler essentially was the party, in the same way Trump essentially is the republican party now.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The problem is we already elected him and now he's going full fascist so everything you wrote was a waste of time.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

'This is what happened, so it's the only thing that could possibly have happened!'

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

How many more votes do you need to jail a convicted felon

[–] [email protected] -5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Labor's not pro-israel lol

They're entirely neutral

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

tbf, neutrality in the face atrocity is complicity

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Neutrality towards Israeli is about as oppositional as any entity can be. The extremes tend to fall between 'support' and 'neutrality' no matter how many children or civilians die.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Only if you're consumed by propaganda.

What the fuck can australia legitimately do about the conflict? Nothing but strong words and not much else.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

There is no evidence that the weapon system is being used in Gaza, and the government also requested that it is not to be used in Gaza.

Likewise, the Australian government supplied fuel and bikes to Gaza; those very same bikes were used in the massacres that started the war. Are you going to hold the Australian government equally accountable for sending aid to Gaza, knowing that it will be Hamas who will use it?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Selling weapons to a military you are aware is in the long process of violently persecuting millions of people, in their country, with those weapons, is not the same as providing non-weapons to the persecuted, and having radicals fighting against the colonizing force appropriating them. This is a bad faith argument.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The weapons aren't sold yet, they're being trialled. Once the trial concludes its findings, then the purchase may go through.

They again, aren't using the weapons in Gaza, because they're being trialled. The Australian government also requested that the weapons are not to be used in Gaza.

Don't dismiss Hamas as just radicals. They are the governing force of Gaza. Before the war, all international aid moved through Hamas before it could reach the Palestinians. That means that the bikes and fuel, both of which were used in the massacres that caused this current conflict, were directly sent to Hamas.

Stop lying.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I never said they didn't take control, and they are radicals, I hear that descriptor attached to them all the time. Also, this specific unit was something I used to show that Australia has long term weapons sales desires with an apartheid state. When a government takes foreign aid, rather than distribute it, it is often said that they appropriated it, or stole it, or high-jacked it, whatever. Even beyond that, it wasn't actual weapons, literally anything can be used as a weapon, so we either say literally everything going to a place is a weapons sales/trade/donation, or we reserve that name for things built specifically to be weapons.

Also, do not gloss over how colonized people often end up having to rely on radical elements of their population to fight against the colonizers. Do not gloss over the maneuvers bibi, and the israeli government, performed to make sure hamas stays in power, because they use them as a PR shield, like their soldiers record themselves using palestinians as bullet shields. Israel is the colonizing force here, the terrorist guerrilla government of hamas is a result of reaction to this colonization.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

This conversation is pointless. You aren't going to budge on anything, and I'm not going to take hearsay seriously. This is pretty off-topic as it is.

Bottom line is this:

Your initial claim that Australia is selling weapons to Israel was verifiably false.

Australia is not selling those weapon systems to Israel just yet; they are being trialled. No Australian weapon is used in Gaza. The Australian government has told the Israeli government not to use Australian weapons in Gaza.

Nothing else needs to be said on the matter

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›