this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
433 points (73.6% liked)

Selfhosted

46650 readers
1154 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 4) 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Enjoy the mosquitos

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So, they left a bucket of water to stagnate next to a bus stop?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 251 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Why is this in self hosted?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

So I appreciate some outside the box thinking. But this just reeks of techbros invent trees but worse. Most of the considerations below seem to think trees and cars are natural enemies, I would argue we reduce cars instead.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I’m only conjecturing, but there may be cities where planting trees isn’t feasible due to density of the city and the surrounding infrastructure. It may be cheaper to use these in place of trees, though I admit I know nothing about what’s pictured.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

'What's wrong with trees? They're taking up space for real estate development, stupid peasant."

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 day ago (8 children)

@ECEC
Any city manager could tell you everything wrong with having trees downtown.
* Birds get into them and when they're nesting, they attack anybody walking by
*Birds also shit on the cars parked under them, and most drivers look for shade to park under
*Bugs get into them and attract birds when birds aren't nesting
*Trees drop sap, which also ruins a car's finish
*city workers have to spend time on the clock keeping the leaves picked up off the ground

Yeah, the drawback is that the algae don't provide shade.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

this

https://youtube.com/watch?v=DZ_T4zMBx6E

ik its youtube, calm down your pitchforks

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (6 children)

Devil's advocate:

These cost far less to maintain than having a team or two dedicated to upkeep for the trees.

That said, these things are a terrible idea, clearly the brainchild of clueless techbros, and overall a massive eyesore. Trees are objectively the better option. Just not Bradford Pear trees... Anything but the cum tree.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

I don't agree that these are an eyesore, they are not as pretty as a tree, no, but disgustingly ugly? Nah.

Seems like a decent idea if you have an over developed location where you can't plant a tree.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Someones gunna break it too.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 73 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Because there's no serious answers being given even though there are at least 2:

  • trees have roots, roots ruin any nearby human infrastructure. You'll note this says "in urban environments" and that there are trees nearby, so this is probably the big reason
  • trees need maintenance, which costs money. this is a stupid reason imo, but it's one nonetheless
  • algae is cool, ok?
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago (4 children)

On the other hand, algae do not produce shade, not sure if it filters atmospheric pollutants, and trees provide all sort of other services to the local ecosystem.

Maybe this invention can be used on places where trees cannot lives, but I'd still take a city with trees over a city full of green tanks.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

trees dont ruin ANY human infrastructure. But the usual urban infrastructure isnt well thought out enough to exist around trees. But smarter urbanism is possible and in fact does exist.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

trees dont ruin ANY human infrastructure

I think you mean all, as this reads more like "nuh uh, trees don't ruin anything"

But smarter urbanism is possible and in fact does exist.

And those are not the norm, so for places that don't plan to just destroy what's already there and start anew, this is an option

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Don't forget pollen and seeds.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Oh yeah

I'm one of those elites who don't have allergies so I tend to forget 😎😎😎

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Plus pollen means having to pay to clean it off.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Algae is also more efficient per cubic meter, if I understand correctly.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

A big problem with trees is roots, especially in cities with dense underground infrastructure. If there’s an actual way to produce the same amount of oxygen as a tree in a smaller space, I’m all for it. I’m honestly okay with how these look, assuming low maintenance.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 day ago (9 children)

How do I self host these? I tried docker run liquidtrees it didn't work

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trees don't make number go up.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Don't you want to subscribe to our Tree Ultimate program, that will give you a limited access to a living tree for 199.99 a month or 1999 a year?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›